NCT02401724

Brief Summary

After a stroke affecting the right side of the brain, many patients are affected by "spatial neglect": the damage to the brain causes them to ignore the left side of their surroundings. At its most extreme they may be unaware that they have a left side, or believe that it is moving normally when it is in fact paralysed. In milder cases, people may be unable to recognise touch on the left side if their right side is also being touched, or objects in their left visual field if something is visible to their right. Neglect alters peoples' quality of life profoundly, often renders them more dependent on others to undertake basic activities of daily living, and makes effective rehabilitation much more difficult. The limited success of current treatment approaches indicates gaps in understanding of the underlying mechanisms of neglect and its recovery. Recent data suggest that the problems in responding to the left side are a result of an imbalance of activity in those parts of the brain responsible for deciding which side to pay attention to. It might therefore be possible to help people with neglect by "rebalancing" the brain either by increasing activity in the damaged side, or alternatively by reducing activity in the undamaged side. In this pilot study, the investigators will test whether they can help by doing the second of these things. The investigators propose to conduct a pilot clinical trial to explore whether using electric currents to temporarily modify the activity of specific areas of the intact side of the brain, influences recovery from neglect, when used either alone, or in combination with a training method that has previously appeared promising as a treatment. Brain activity will be modified using a technique called "transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)", in which small electric currents are applied to the scalp with a wire covered in damp cotton pads. This will be done over the specific parts of the brain that are responsible for focusing attention to one side. The investigators will compare the clinical outcomes of four interventions (1: behavioural, 2: tDCS, 3: a combination of both and 4: control). The investigators hope that these studies will advance their understanding of what treatments may help people with neglect, and how they might work.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2015

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2015

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 30, 2015

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

March 30, 2015

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

March 10, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Hemispatial neglectTranscranial direct current stimulationRehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT)

    6 months post intervention

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Compliance as measured by adherence to task instructions (percentage of intervention sessions, BIT tests completed)

    baseline

  • Compliance as measured by adherence to task instructions (percentage of intervention sessions, BIT tests completed)

    3 weeks

  • Compliance as measured by adherence to task instructions (percentage of intervention sessions, BIT tests completed)

    6 months

  • Retention Numbers

    baseline

  • Retention Numbers

    3 weeks

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Action Training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Training exercise which involves patients lifting up rods of different sizes and shifting their grip if this is too far to one side

Other: Action Training

tDCS

EXPERIMENTAL

A constant 1mA current will be applied to the left (undamaged) side of the scalp with an electrode covered with a damp cotton pad (25 cm2). The current will be applied for 15 minutes per day, with a total of 10 sessions over 3 weeks.

Other: Transcranial direct current stimulation

Action Training + tDCs

EXPERIMENTAL

This will involve the same procedure as in action training only but with tDCS applied for 15 minutes during the rodlifting.

Other: Transcranial direct current stimulationOther: Action Training

Control training

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

For the control training, patients will be asked to simply reach for the right hand side of each rod with their right (unaffected) hand and lift it

Interventions

Also known as: tDCS
Action Training + tDCstDCS
Action TrainingAction Training + tDCs

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ischemic stroke affecting the right hemisphere, confirmed by CT or MRI.
  • Persistent neglect for one month after ictus (confirmed by BIT).
  • Prestroke functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2).
  • Between 18-90 years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18.
  • Patients who do not understand verbal or written English (ie.need of translaters)
  • bilateral infarcts (Confirmed by CT, MRI)
  • Dementia (MOCA, Score \<26).
  • Neurological Disease (eg. Parkinson's Disease, epilepsy, MS)
  • Significant morbidity (eg cancer, severe cardiac failure) likely to affect participation.
  • Alcohol excess (more than 50/40 units a week for men/women respectively).
  • History of epilepsy, medications or psychoactive drugs that can lower seizure threshold \[imipramine, amitriptyline, doxepine, nortriptyline, maprotiline, chlorpromazine, clozapine, foscarnet, ganciclovir, ritonavir, amphetamines, cocaine, (MDMA, ecstasy), phencyclidine (PCP, angel dust), ketamine, gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB), alcohol, theophylline\]. Withdrawal from alcohol, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, meprobamate, chloral hydrate. Patients who are pregnant or have suffered from a stroke-related seizure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Longley V, Hazelton C, Heal C, Pollock A, Woodward-Nutt K, Mitchell C, Pobric G, Vail A, Bowen A. Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 1;7(7):CD003586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003586.pub4.

  • Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 11;11(11):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4.

  • Learmonth G, Benwell CSY, Marker G, Dascalu D, Checketts M, Santosh C, Barber M, Walters M, Muir KW, Harvey M. Non-invasive brain stimulation in Stroke patients (NIBS): A prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) feasibility trial using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Sep;31(8):1163-1189. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1767161. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokePerceptual Disorders

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Central Study Contacts

Monika Harvey, BSc (hons), MSc, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2015

First Posted

March 30, 2015

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2018

Study Completion

June 1, 2018

Last Updated

March 30, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-03