The Impact of Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine Use At Scale on Newborn Outcomes in Nigeria
MIPP-NG
Scaling up the Use of Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for the Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Results and Lessons on Scalability, Costs and Program From Three Local Government Areas in Sokoto State, Nigeria
1 other identifier
interventional
31,493
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of the scale-up of sulphadoxine- pyrimethamine (SP) for the preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in three Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Sokoto State, Nigeria. The scale-up strategy tested included the introduction of community-based distribution of SP in addition to ongoing health facility distribution during antenatal care (ANC) visits. In addition, the study examined for the effect of SP use by participants during pregnancy on the head circumference of live newborns and on the odds of a baby being a stillborn. Finally, the investigators also sought to quantify the costs associated with program scale up SP to deliver at least three doses of SP per participant via a government operated distribution program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2016
CompletedMay 2, 2016
April 1, 2016
7 months
April 26, 2016
April 28, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of participants that got SP coverage among all pregnant women
The percentage SP coverage among all pregnant participants and by number of SP doses ingested. The outcome form will be used to obtain an aggregate number of women that received SP. The total number of eligible women will be obtained from either an enumeration of eligible women in the intervention LGA, or by population estimation in the counterfactual LGA.
Up to 7 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Cost per Woman served with SP in Nigeria Naira
Up to 7 months
Cost per SP dose delivered in Nigeria Naira
Up to 12 months
Incidence of Stillbirths in stillbirths per 1000 term births
Up to 7 months
Head circumference of Newborn in millimeters
Up to 7 months
Study Arms (1)
Community distribution of SP
EXPERIMENTALAll the eligible pregnant women were reached with SP either at health clinic and/or at community/household level with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). Alerts and reminders were sent to them by community-based health volunteers ahead of subsequent SP doses.
Interventions
SP delivered at both the community and facility level by trained CBHVs in three LGAs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be pregnant.
- Pregnant participants must have experienced quickening in course of gestation.
- Participants must reside in an intervention or a counterfactual LGA.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-pregnant residents in a counterfactual or an intervention LGA.
- Non-residents of counterfactual or intervention LGA.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.lead
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundationcollaborator
- Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeriacollaborator
Related Publications (12)
WHO. World Malaria Report 2015 [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/200018/1/9789241565158_eng.pdf?ua=1
BACKGROUNDDellicour S, Tatem AJ, Guerra CA, Snow RW, ter Kuile FO. Quantifying the number of pregnancies at risk of malaria in 2007: a demographic study. PLoS Med. 2010 Jan 26;7(1):e1000221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000221.
PMID: 20126256BACKGROUNDPartnership RBM. Roll Back Malaria Annual Report 2013 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.rollbackmalaria.org/files/files/resources/RBM-Annual-Report- 2013(1).pdf
BACKGROUNDOnwujekwe O, Chima R, Okonkwo P. Economic burden of malaria illness on households versus that of all other illness episodes: a study in five malaria holo-endemic Nigerian communities. Health Policy. 2000 Nov 17;54(2):143-59. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00105-6.
PMID: 11094267BACKGROUNDDesai M, ter Kuile FO, Nosten F, McGready R, Asamoa K, Brabin B, Newman RD. Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;7(2):93-104. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70021-X.
PMID: 17251080BACKGROUNDRadeva-Petrova D, Kayentao K, ter Kuile FO, Sinclair D, Garner P. Drugs for preventing malaria in pregnant women in endemic areas: any drug regimen versus placebo or no treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 10;2014(10):CD000169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000169.pub3.
PMID: 25300703BACKGROUNDBlencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, Hogan D, Shiekh S, Qureshi ZU, You D, Lawn JE; Lancet Stillbirth Epidemiology Investigator Group. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb;4(2):e98-e108. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
PMID: 26795602BACKGROUNDVillar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, Bertino E, Altman DG, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Frederick IO, Noble AJ, Pang R, Barros FC, Chumlea C, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014 Sep 6;384(9946):857-68. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60932-6.
PMID: 25209487BACKGROUNDMenendez C, Ordi J, Ismail MR, Ventura PJ, Aponte JJ, Kahigwa E, Font F, Alonso PL. The impact of placental malaria on gestational age and birth weight. J Infect Dis. 2000 May;181(5):1740-5. doi: 10.1086/315449. Epub 2000 May 15.
PMID: 10823776BACKGROUNDMcClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Dent AE, Meshnick SR. A systematic review of the impact of malaria prevention in pregnancy on low birth weight and maternal anemia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.014. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PMID: 23490427BACKGROUNDWHO. Consensus Statement: Optimizing the Delivery of Malaria-inPregnancy Interventions [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.pmi.gov/docs/default-source/default-document-library/toolscurricula/consensusreport_malariapregnancy.pdf?sfvrsn=4
BACKGROUNDOrobaton N, Austin AM, Abegunde D, Ibrahim M, Mohammed Z, Abdul-Azeez J, Ganiyu H, Nanbol Z, Fapohunda B, Beal K. Scaling-up the use of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy: results and lessons on scalability, costs and programme impact from three local government areas in Sokoto State, Nigeria. Malar J. 2016 Nov 4;15(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1578-x.
PMID: 27814763DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nosa G Orobaton, MD, DrPH
John Snow, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Advisor, Global Health/Chief of Party
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2016
First Posted
May 2, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 2, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04