ProGrip Mesh Repair vs Lichtenstein Operation
Randomized Controlled Single-Center Trial: Self-Gripping ProGrip Mesh Repair vs Lichtenstein Operation of Inguinal Hernia
1 other identifier
interventional
143
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to compare clinical outcomes and to analyze cost-effectiveness following self-gripping, sutureless Parietex ProGrip Mesh to traditional Lichtenstein Operation with lightweight polypropylene mesh.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 6, 2016
October 1, 2016
1.2 years
April 12, 2016
October 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of post-operative pain and its intensity using VAS Scale
Assessment will be made using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Rate of foreign body sensation - Subjective feeling of discomfort in the groin
12 Months
Hernia recurrence rate
12 Months
Post-operative complications
12 Months
Duration of surgery
Day of surgery
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety]
12 Months
Study Arms (2)
ProGrip Mesh Repair
ACTIVE COMPARATOR80 patients are randomized to inguinal hernia repair using selfgripping ProGrip Mesh (Covidien Parietex ProGrip Self-Fixating Mesh) - sutureless fixation.
Lichtenstein Operation
ACTIVE COMPARATOR80 patients are randomized to inguinal hernia repair using lightweight polypropylene mesh (\<40 g/m2) with standard Lichtenstein technique.
Interventions
Serag Wiessner SERAMESH® PA 15x10 cm
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients with primary inguinal hernia
- Signed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent hernia
- Emergency procedure
- Patient not willing to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Regional Health Center in Kartuzy
Kartuzy, 83-300, Poland
Related Publications (1)
Sanders DL, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, Miserez M, Gingell-Littlejohn M, Smeds S. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1373-82; discussion 1382. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9598. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
PMID: 25146918RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mateusz T Zamkowski, MD
Regional Health Center in Kartuzy, Department of General Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2016
First Posted
April 22, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 6, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10