Dynamic Scaffold Versus Lichtenstein Open Hernioplasty.
DYSLOH
The DySLOH Study: Dynamic Scaffold Versus Lichtenstein Open Hernioplasty. A Comparative Outcome Assessment Between the Two Techniques.
1 other identifier
interventional
188
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluating the outcomes of patients undergoing open anterior inguinal hernioplasty comparing two different techniques: Lichtenstein/plug and mesh and ProFlor. The outcomes of these two groups of patients, respectively the Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair with static flat mesh and the defect obliteration with 3D dynamic scaffold Proflor, are compared in respect to defined variables along stages: intraoperative, early and long term postoperative.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2023
CompletedJanuary 31, 2023
January 1, 2023
3 years
January 21, 2023
January 21, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
early postoperative complications
bleeding, hematoma and infections
30 days after surgery
patients clinical outcome
VAS score
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
evaluation of quality of life during the postoperative period
24 months
Study Arms (2)
ProFlor
EXPERIMENTALpatients underwent to inguinal hernia repair with use of ProFlor dynamic scaffold
Lichtenstein
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients underwent to Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible patients were individuals aged between 18 and 85 years old, competent to give consent, affected by clinically relevant primary inguinal hernia scheduled to undergo elective inguinal hernia repair and eligible for outpatient surgical procedure with local anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent inguinal hernia
- Incarcerated inguinal hernia
- Hernia not in the inguinal area
- Signs of obvious local or systemic infection
- ASA score \> 4
- Presenting with unstable angina or NYHA class of IV
- Pregnant
- Active drug user
- Immunosuppression, chemotherapy
- Chronic renal insufficiency
- Abdominal ascites
- Infection in area of the surgical field
- BMI \>35
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Palermo
Palermo, 90127, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- full professor of surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2023
First Posted
January 31, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
January 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share