NCT02741245

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety and tolerability of 2 dose levels of MK-0653H in Japanese participants. The primary hypotheses are that the administration of MK-0653H is safe and tolerable and that MK-0653H is superior to single entity of Ezetimibe and Rosuvastatin in percent reduction from baseline in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) after 12 weeks of treatment.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
321

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 13, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 9, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 18, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 18, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 9, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 16, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 13, 2016

Results QC Date

January 5, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (19)

  • Percentage Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)

    Participants had LDL-C levels assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of study drug administration. The change from baseline was calculated. Results were reported as a M-estimate.

    Baseline and Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants that reported at least 1 AE was summarized

    up to 14 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Had Study Drug Discontinued Due to Adverse Event

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. The percentage of participants that had study drug discontinued due to an AE was summarized.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Gastrointestinal-related AEs

    Gastrointestinal-related AEs included all preferred terms within system organ class of Gastrointestinal Disorders except Chapped Lips and Toothache.

    up to 14 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Gallbladder-related AEs

    Gallbladder-related AEs included Bile Duct Obstruction, Bile Duct Stone, Bile Duct Stenosis, Biliary Colic, Cholangitis, Cholecystectomy, Cholecystitis, Cholelithiasis, Gallbladder Disorder, Gallbladder Perforation, Hepatic Pain, and Hydrocholecystis.

    up to 14 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Allergic Reaction or Rash AEs

    Allergic Reaction or Rash AEs included Allergy to Arthropod Sting, Anaphylactoid Reaction, Anaphylactic Reaction, Anaphylatic Shock, Anaphylactoid Shock, Angioedema, Conjunctivitis Allergic, Contrast Media Reaction, Dermatitis, Dermatitis Allergic, Dermatitis Atopic, Dermatitis Bullous, Dermatitis Contact, Dermatitis Psoriasiform, Drug Hypersensitivity, Eczema, Eosinophila, Erythema, Eye Allergy, Face Oedema, Hypersensitivity, Mechanical Urticaria, Palmar Erythema, Periorbital Oedema, Photodermatosis, Photosensitivity Allergic reaction, Photosensitivity Reaction, Pigmentation Disorder, Pruritus, Pruritus Generalised, Rash, Rash Erythematous, Rash Follicular, Rash Generalised, Rash Maculo-Papular, Rash Papulosquamous, Rash Pruritic, Rash Pustular, Rash Vesicular, Rhinitis, Rhinitis Allergic, Rosacea, Skin Exfoliation, Skin Disorder, Skin Hyperpigmentation, Skin Lesion, Skin Mass, Skin Ulcer, Subcutaneous Nodule, Swelling Face, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Rash, Urticaria.

    up to 14 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience 1 or More Hepatitis-related AEs

    Hepatitis-related AEs included Cholestasis, Cytolytic Hepatitis, Hepatic Cyst, Hepatic Failure, Hepatic Lesion, Hepatic Necrosis, Hepatitis, Hepatitis Cholestatic, Hepatitis Fulminant, Hepatitis Infectious, Hepatocellular Injury, Hepatomegaly, Jaundice, Jaundice Cholestatic.

    up to 14 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≥3 Times Upper Normal Limit (ULN)

    Participants had ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had 2 consecutive assessments of ALT that were 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The ALT ULN was 40 U/L.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Consecutive Elevations in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≥3 Times Upper Normal Limit (ULN)

    Participants had AST levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had 2 consecutive assessments of AST that were 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST ULN was 40 U/L..

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≥3 Times Upper Normal Limit (ULN)

    Participants had ALT and AST levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had 2 consecutive assessments of ALT and/or AST that were 3 x ULN or greater were recorded. The ALT and AST ULNs were 40 U/L.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Elevation in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≥5 Times Upper Normal Limit (ULN)

    Participants had ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessments of ALT that was 5x ULN or greater were recorded. The ALT ULN was 40 U/L.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Elevation in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≥5 Times Upper Normal Limit (ULN)

    Participants had AST levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessments of AST that was 5x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST ULN was 40 U/L.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Elevation in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ≥10 Times Upper Normal Limit (ULN)

    Participants had ALT levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessments of ALT that was 10x ULN or greater were recorded. The ALT ULN was 40 U/L.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Elevation in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≥10 Times Upper Normal Limit (ULN)

    Participants had AST levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had an assessments of AST that was 10x ULN or greater were recorded. The AST ULN was 40 U/L.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Consecutive Elevations in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≥10 Times Upper Normal Limit (ULN)

    Participants had ALT and AST levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had 2 consecutive assessments of ALT and/or AST that were 10x ULN or greater were recorded. The ALT and AST ULNs were 40 U/L.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants With Potential Hy's Law Condition

    Percentage of Participants with Potential Hy's Law Condition (defined as serum ALT or serum AST elevations \>3xULN, with serum alkalinephosphatase \<2xULN and total bilirubin (TBL) ≥2xULN) was summarized. The ALT and AST ULNs were 40 U/L. The ULN for alkaline phosphatase was 359 IU/L and the ULN for total bilirubin was 1.2 mg/dL.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Elevations in Creatine Kinase (CK) ≥10 Times ULN

    Participants had creatine phosphokinase (CK) levels assessed throughout the 12 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was ≥10 x ULN were recorded. The CK ULNs for males and females were 287 IU/L and 163 IU/L, respectively.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Elevations in Creatine Kinase (CK) ≥10 Times ULN With Muscle Symptoms

    Participants had CK levels assessed throughout the 52 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was ≥10 x ULN and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days were recorded. The CK ULNs for males and females were 287 IU/L and 163 IU/L, respectively.

    up to 12 weeks

  • Percentage of Participants Who Experience Elevations in Creatine Kinase (CK) ≥10 Times ULN and Drug-Related Muscle Symptoms

    Participants had CK levels assessed throughout the 52 week treatment period. Participants who had any CK level that was ≥10 x ULN and had associated muscle symptoms present within +/- 7 days that were reported as at least possibly-related to study drug were recorded. The CK ULNs for males and females were 287 IU/L and 163 IU/L, respectively.

    up to 12 weeks

Study Arms (5)

Ezetimibe 10 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

1 Ezetimibe 10 mg tablet and 2 Rosuvastatin placebo capsules once daily for 12 weeks

Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mgDrug: Placebo for Rosuvastatin

Rosuvastatin 2.5 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

1 Rosuvastatin 2.5 mg capsule, 1 Rosuvastatin placebo capsule and 1 Ezetimibe placebo tablet once daily for 12 weeks.

Drug: Rosuvastatin 2.5 mgDrug: Placebo for EzetimibeDrug: Placebo for Rosuvastatin

Rosuvastatin 5.0 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

2 Rosuvastatin 2.5 mg capsules and Ezetimibe placebo tablet once daily for 12 weeks.

Drug: Rosuvastatin 2.5 mgDrug: Placebo for Ezetimibe

Ezetimibe 10 mg+ Rosuvastatin 2.5 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

1 Ezetimbie 10 mg tablet, 1 Rosuvastatin 2.5 mg capsule and 1 Rosuvastatin placebo capsule once daily for 12 weeks.

Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mgDrug: Rosuvastatin 2.5 mgDrug: Placebo for Rosuvastatin

Ezetimibe 10 mg+ Rosuvastatin 5.0 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

1 Ezetimbie 10 mg tablet and 2 Rosuvastatin 2.5 mg capsules once daily for 12 weeks.

Drug: Ezetimibe 10 mgDrug: Rosuvastatin 2.5 mg

Interventions

Ezetimibe 10 mgEzetimibe 10 mg+ Rosuvastatin 2.5 mgEzetimibe 10 mg+ Rosuvastatin 5.0 mg
Ezetimibe 10 mg+ Rosuvastatin 2.5 mgEzetimibe 10 mg+ Rosuvastatin 5.0 mgRosuvastatin 2.5 mgRosuvastatin 5.0 mg
Rosuvastatin 2.5 mgRosuvastatin 5.0 mg
Ezetimibe 10 mgEzetimibe 10 mg+ Rosuvastatin 2.5 mgRosuvastatin 2.5 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Japanese
  • Outpatient with hypercholesterolemia
  • Female participant who is of reproductive potential has to agree to remain abstinent or use (or partner use) two acceptable methods of birth control from date of signed informed consent to the 14 days after the last dose of study drug
  • Will maintain a stable diet that is consistent with the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guideline 2012 (JAS 2012) for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases for the duration of the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncontrolled hypertension (treated or untreated)
  • Uncontrolled type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • History of coronary artery disease (CAD), CAD-equivalent disease
  • Familial hypercholesterolemia or has undergone LDL apheresis
  • Uncontrolled endocrine or metabolic disease known to influence serum lipids or lipoproteins
  • Has had a gastrointestinal tract bypass, or other significant intestinal malabsorption
  • History of cancer within the past 5 years (except for successfully treated dermatological basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma or in situ cervical cancer)
  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive
  • History of drug/ alcohol abuse within the past 5 years or psychiatric illness not adequately controlled and stable on pharmacotherapy
  • Consumes more than 25 g of alcohol per day
  • Currently following an excessive weight reduction diet
  • Currently engages in a vigorous exercise regimen (e.g.; marathon training, body building training etc.) or intends to start training during the study
  • Hypersensitivity or intolerance to Ezetimibe or Rosuvastatin
  • Myopathy or rhabdomyolysis with Ezetimibe or any statin
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Teramoto T, Yokote K, Nishida C, Oshima N, Takase T. A phase III clinical trial to study the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe plus rosuvastatin combination therapy in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia - A randomized, double-blind comparative study. J Clin Therapeut Med. 2017;33(11):881-896.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Interventions

EzetimibeRosuvastatin Calcium

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HyperlipidemiasDyslipidemiasLipid Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AzetidinesAzetinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsSulfonamidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsFluorobenzenesHydrocarbons, FluorinatedHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsSulfonesSulfur CompoundsPyrimidines

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2016

First Posted

April 18, 2016

Study Start

June 9, 2016

Primary Completion

January 18, 2017

Study Completion

January 18, 2017

Last Updated

May 16, 2024

Results First Posted

March 9, 2018

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share