NCT01154036

Brief Summary

This study will compare the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of switching to co-administration of ezetimibe and atorvastatin versus treatment with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin in high cardiovascular risk patients with hypercholesterolemia who have not achieved specified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The primary hypothesis is that the co-administration of ezetimibe 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg will be superior to both atorvastatin 20 mg and rosuvastatin 10 mg with respect to the percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) after 6 weeks of treatment.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,547

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2010

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 29, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 30, 2010

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2010

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2012

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 12, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 9, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

June 29, 2010

Results QC Date

September 5, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Phase I)

    LDL-C levels measured at Baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (Week 6; end of Phase I). Baseline was defined as the average value of the measurements taken at Visits 3 and 4. LDL-C was calculated using the Friedewald method when triglyceride (TG)\<350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L) and beta quantification ultracentrifugation when TG≥350 mg/dL (3.95 mmol/L).

    Baseline and Week 6 (end of Phase I )

Secondary Outcomes (27)

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Phase II).

    Baseline (Week 6) and Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants That Reach Target LDL-C Level of < 100 mg/dL (Phase I)

    Week 6 (End of Phase I)

  • Percentage of Participants That Reach Target LDL-C Level of < 100 mg/dL (Phase II)

    Week 12 (End of Phase II)

  • Percentage of Participants That Reach Target LDL-C Level of < 70 mg/dL (Phase I)

    Week 6 (End of Phase I)

  • Percentage of Participants That Reach Target LDL-C Level of < 70 mg/dL (Phase II)

    Week 12 (end of Phase II)

  • +22 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (8)

Phase I: ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Co-administration of EZ 10 mg tablet + Atorva 10 mg tablet; once daily for 6 weeks

Drug: ezetimibe 10 mgDrug: atorvastatin

Phase I: Atorvastatin 20 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Atorvastatin 20 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks

Drug: atorvastatin

Phase I: Rosuvastatin 10 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet once daily for 6 weeks

Drug: Comparator: rosuvastatin

Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants who had previously received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg in Phase I and continued on EZ 10 mg + Atorva 10 mg once daily for 6 weeks during Phase II regardless of whether or not LDL-C goals were achieved in Phase I

Drug: ezetimibe 10 mgDrug: atorvastatin

Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II

Drug: ezetimibe 10 mgDrug: atorvastatin

Phase II: Atorva 40mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants who had previously received Atorva 20 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched Atorva 40 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II

Drug: atorvastatin

Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and received EZ 10 mg + Atorva 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase II

Drug: ezetimibe 10 mgDrug: atorvastatin

Phase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants who had previously received Rosuvastatin 10 mg in Phase I and did not reach LDL-C goal and were switched to Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 weeks in Phase

Drug: Comparator: rosuvastatin

Interventions

Phase I: ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mgPhase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Phase I: Atorvastatin 20 mgPhase I: ezetimibe (EZ) 10 mg + atorvastatin (Atorva) 10 mgPhase II: Atorva 40mgPhase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [A]Phase II: EZ 10mg + Atorva 20mg [R]Phase II: EZ 10mg+Atorva 10mg
Phase I: Rosuvastatin 10 mgPhase II: Rosuvastatin 20mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 79 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient is at high cardiovascular risk and meets one of the following conditions: has never taken lipid-lowering therapy or has been off such therapy for at least 6 weeks; or, is currently taking a stable dose of certain lipid-lowering agents
  • Patient is willing to maintain a cholesterol lowering diet during the study
  • Female patients receiving non-cyclical hormone therapy have maintained a stable dose and regimen for at least 8 weeks and are willing to continue the same regimen during the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is Asian
  • Patient routinely has more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day
  • Female patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Patient has congestive heart failure
  • Patient has had a myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, angioplasty, or acute coronary syndrome within 3 months of screening
  • Patient has uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias
  • Patient has had a partial ileal or gastric bypass or other significant intestinal malabsorption
  • Patient has uncontrolled high blood pressure
  • Patient has kidney disease
  • Patient has any disease known to influence blood lipid levels
  • Patient has any disorders of the blood, digestive system, or nervous system including stroke and degenerative disease that would limit study participation
  • Patient has poorly controlled or newly diagnosed diabetes
  • Patient is known to be HIV positive
  • Patient has a history of cancer in the last 5 years, except certain skin and cervical cancers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Krempf M, Simpson RJ Jr, Ramey DR, Brudi P, Giezek H, Tomassini JE, Lee R, Farnier M. Patient and physician factors influence decision-making in hypercholesterolemia: a questionnaire-based survey. Lipids Health Dis. 2015 May 19;14:45. doi: 10.1186/s12944-015-0037-y.

  • Bays HE, Averna M, Majul C, Muller-Wieland D, De Pellegrin A, Giezek H, Lee R, Lowe RS, Brudi P, Triscari J, Farnier M. Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe added to atorvastatin versus atorvastatin uptitration or switching to rosuvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 15;112(12):1885-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Interventions

EzetimibeAtorvastatin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HyperlipidemiasDyslipidemiasLipid Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AzetidinesAzetinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPyrrolesAzolesHeptanoic AcidsFatty AcidsLipids

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp

Study Officials

  • Medical Monitor

    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2010

First Posted

June 30, 2010

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion

September 1, 2012

Study Completion

October 1, 2012

Last Updated

February 9, 2022

Results First Posted

February 12, 2014

Record last verified: 2022-02