NCT02725905

Brief Summary

Eight U.S. medical schools will be participating in the study: Weight Management Counseling in Medical Schools, also known as MSWEIGHT. This is a five-year randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare the efficacy of two approaches to learning weight management counseling: 1)traditional education (TE) and; 2) multi-modal educational intervention (MME). The study aims are to refine and compare the efficacy of MME to TE on observed student weight management counseling skills measured through the primary outcome, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3,199

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 3, 2016

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2016

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2020

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 17, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

March 3, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Weight Management CounselingMedical School Education

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean Score on Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE); MME and TE students will be compared regarding the mean score.

    The primary outcome is the OSCE, the standard method for evaluating medical students' skill level at U.S. medical schools. The investigators will compare the efficacy of MME to TE on weight management counseling skills assessed among two separate 3rd year student classes (pre and post MSWeight implementation). MME and TE students will be compared regarding the mean score.

    Up to 2 years

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Mean self-efficacy score on 5As will be calculated as the mean of student's self-reported skill level (1=not at all skilled through 4=very skilled) on 7 items regarding patient counseling skills.

    Up to Three Years

  • Percentage of students reporting 3 = moderately skilled or 4 = very skilled will be calculated on 7 items regarding patient counseling skills.

    Upto Three Years

Study Arms (2)

Multi-Modal Education (MME)

EXPERIMENTAL

1\) The MME is a three year multi-modal educational intervention including a series of interactive learning components and interventions focused on integrated weight management counseling. Prior to its launch, each component of the curriculum will be refined using a school participatory approach to help ensure feasibility and acceptability.

Behavioral: Multi-Modal Education (MME)

Traditional Education (TE)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

2\) The TE arm of the study includes the school's current curriculum which may include topics related to the treatment of weight management and obesity.

Behavioral: Traditional Education (TE)

Interventions

The MME curriculum focuses on developing weight management counseling (WMC) skills through several components: 1) a web course focused on WMC knowledge and clinical skill competencies; 2) WMC role-play exercises for an opportunity to use an algorithm to practice patient-centered WMC; 3) personal weight management exercises to increase awareness of "Assist" activities (e.g. daily food monitoring using mobile apps, etc); 4) obesity bias assessments, video, and discussions to modify attitudes of implicit weight bias; 5) a formative web-based encounter to interact with and receive feedback from a standardized patient; and 6) an enhanced clerkship rotation focusing on providing learning to preceptors and allowing students to observe preceptors counseling patients who are overweight or obese.

Also known as: MME
Multi-Modal Education (MME)

Current curriculum may consist of topics related to biology, population health, or counseling skills. TE also may include sporadic stand-alone lectures or small group discussions conducted separately or as a part of a patient interviewing or behavioral course.

Also known as: TE
Traditional Education (TE)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The medical school has:
  • Interest in WMC medical education reform.
  • Curricula resources (e.g. academic computing) to facilitate web-course training and a system to maintain student contact.
  • The willingness and ability to incorporate all components of MSWEIGHT into the medical school curriculum, require or strongly encourage students to participate, and award credit for completion.
  • The willingness and ability to offer the WMC OSCE for third year medical students upon completion of the Family or Internal Medicine clerkship rotation.

You may not qualify if:

  • The ability to incorporate all components of MSWEIGHT into the medical school curriculum.
  • The ability to offer the WMC OSCE for third year medical students upon completion of the Family or Internal Medicine clerkship rotation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

University of Alabama-Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Georgetown University School of Medicine

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States

Location

University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

University of Louisville School of Medicine

Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States

Location

Creighton University School of Medicine

Omaha, Nebraska, 68178, United States

Location

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Brown University

Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Leblanc ES, O'Connor E, Whitlock EP, Patnode CD, Kapka T. Effectiveness of primary care-relevant treatments for obesity in adults: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):434-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00006.

    PMID: 21969342BACKGROUND
  • Block JP, DeSalvo KB, Fisher WP. Are physicians equipped to address the obesity epidemic? Knowledge and attitudes of internal medicine residents. Prev Med. 2003 Jun;36(6):669-75. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00055-0.

    PMID: 12744909BACKGROUND
  • Vitolins MZ, Crandall S, Miller D, Ip E, Marion G, Spangler JG. Obesity educational interventions in U.S. medical schools: a systematic review and identified gaps. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(3):267-72. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.692286.

    PMID: 22775792BACKGROUND
  • Forman-Hoffman V, Little A, Wahls T. Barriers to obesity management: a pilot study of primary care clinicians. BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Jun 6;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-35.

    PMID: 16756673BACKGROUND
  • Kristeller JL, Hoerr RA. Physician attitudes toward managing obesity: differences among six specialty groups. Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;26(4):542-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0171.

    PMID: 9245677BACKGROUND
  • Davis NJ, Shishodia H, Taqui B, Dumfeh C, Wylie-Rosett J. Resident physician attitudes and competence about obesity treatment: need for improved education. Med Educ Online. 2008 May 2;13:5. doi: 10.3885/meo.2008.Res00257.

    PMID: 20165535BACKGROUND
  • Adams KM, Kohlmeier M, Zeisel SH. Nutrition education in U.S. medical schools: latest update of a national survey. Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1537-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eab71b.

    PMID: 20736683BACKGROUND
  • Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, Hu FB, Hubbard VS, Jakicic JM, Kushner RF, Loria CM, Millen BE, Nonas CA, Pi-Sunyer FX, Stevens J, Stevens VJ, Wadden TA, Wolfe BM, Yanovski SZ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Obesity Society. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2985-3023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 12. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24239920BACKGROUND
  • Chisholm A, Hart J, Mann KV, Harkness E, Peters S. Preparing medical students to facilitate lifestyle changes with obese patients: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):912-23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182580648.

    PMID: 22622210BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Interventions

MME

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Judith K Ockene, PhD

    University of Massachusetts, Worcester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2016

First Posted

April 1, 2016

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion

November 30, 2020

Study Completion

November 30, 2022

Last Updated

May 17, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The investigators plan to share data through the project website, publications, and presentations to key organizations. The plan is also to share the use of research tools, such as surveys, OSCE cases, and curricula materials, developed over the course of the study. At this time there is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.

Locations