Weight Management Counseling in Medical Schools
MSWEIGHT
2 other identifiers
interventional
3,199
1 country
8
Brief Summary
Eight U.S. medical schools will be participating in the study: Weight Management Counseling in Medical Schools, also known as MSWEIGHT. This is a five-year randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare the efficacy of two approaches to learning weight management counseling: 1)traditional education (TE) and; 2) multi-modal educational intervention (MME). The study aims are to refine and compare the efficacy of MME to TE on observed student weight management counseling skills measured through the primary outcome, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2022
CompletedMay 17, 2023
May 1, 2023
5 years
March 3, 2016
May 16, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Score on Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE); MME and TE students will be compared regarding the mean score.
The primary outcome is the OSCE, the standard method for evaluating medical students' skill level at U.S. medical schools. The investigators will compare the efficacy of MME to TE on weight management counseling skills assessed among two separate 3rd year student classes (pre and post MSWeight implementation). MME and TE students will be compared regarding the mean score.
Up to 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Mean self-efficacy score on 5As will be calculated as the mean of student's self-reported skill level (1=not at all skilled through 4=very skilled) on 7 items regarding patient counseling skills.
Up to Three Years
Percentage of students reporting 3 = moderately skilled or 4 = very skilled will be calculated on 7 items regarding patient counseling skills.
Upto Three Years
Study Arms (2)
Multi-Modal Education (MME)
EXPERIMENTAL1\) The MME is a three year multi-modal educational intervention including a series of interactive learning components and interventions focused on integrated weight management counseling. Prior to its launch, each component of the curriculum will be refined using a school participatory approach to help ensure feasibility and acceptability.
Traditional Education (TE)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2\) The TE arm of the study includes the school's current curriculum which may include topics related to the treatment of weight management and obesity.
Interventions
The MME curriculum focuses on developing weight management counseling (WMC) skills through several components: 1) a web course focused on WMC knowledge and clinical skill competencies; 2) WMC role-play exercises for an opportunity to use an algorithm to practice patient-centered WMC; 3) personal weight management exercises to increase awareness of "Assist" activities (e.g. daily food monitoring using mobile apps, etc); 4) obesity bias assessments, video, and discussions to modify attitudes of implicit weight bias; 5) a formative web-based encounter to interact with and receive feedback from a standardized patient; and 6) an enhanced clerkship rotation focusing on providing learning to preceptors and allowing students to observe preceptors counseling patients who are overweight or obese.
Current curriculum may consist of topics related to biology, population health, or counseling skills. TE also may include sporadic stand-alone lectures or small group discussions conducted separately or as a part of a patient interviewing or behavioral course.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The medical school has:
- Interest in WMC medical education reform.
- Curricula resources (e.g. academic computing) to facilitate web-course training and a system to maintain student contact.
- The willingness and ability to incorporate all components of MSWEIGHT into the medical school curriculum, require or strongly encourage students to participate, and award credit for completion.
- The willingness and ability to offer the WMC OSCE for third year medical students upon completion of the Family or Internal Medicine clerkship rotation.
You may not qualify if:
- The ability to incorporate all components of MSWEIGHT into the medical school curriculum.
- The ability to offer the WMC OSCE for third year medical students upon completion of the Family or Internal Medicine clerkship rotation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Massachusetts, Worcesterlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Brown Universitycollaborator
- Creighton Universitycollaborator
- Georgetown Universitycollaborator
- Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)collaborator
- Oregon Health and Science Universitycollaborator
- University of Alabama at Birminghamcollaborator
- University of Iowacollaborator
- University of Louisvillecollaborator
- University of Pennsylvaniacollaborator
Study Sites (8)
University of Alabama-Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Georgetown University School of Medicine
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
University of Louisville School of Medicine
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Creighton University School of Medicine
Omaha, Nebraska, 68178, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, United States
Related Publications (9)
Leblanc ES, O'Connor E, Whitlock EP, Patnode CD, Kapka T. Effectiveness of primary care-relevant treatments for obesity in adults: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):434-47. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00006.
PMID: 21969342BACKGROUNDBlock JP, DeSalvo KB, Fisher WP. Are physicians equipped to address the obesity epidemic? Knowledge and attitudes of internal medicine residents. Prev Med. 2003 Jun;36(6):669-75. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00055-0.
PMID: 12744909BACKGROUNDVitolins MZ, Crandall S, Miller D, Ip E, Marion G, Spangler JG. Obesity educational interventions in U.S. medical schools: a systematic review and identified gaps. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(3):267-72. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.692286.
PMID: 22775792BACKGROUNDForman-Hoffman V, Little A, Wahls T. Barriers to obesity management: a pilot study of primary care clinicians. BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Jun 6;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-35.
PMID: 16756673BACKGROUNDKristeller JL, Hoerr RA. Physician attitudes toward managing obesity: differences among six specialty groups. Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;26(4):542-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0171.
PMID: 9245677BACKGROUNDDavis NJ, Shishodia H, Taqui B, Dumfeh C, Wylie-Rosett J. Resident physician attitudes and competence about obesity treatment: need for improved education. Med Educ Online. 2008 May 2;13:5. doi: 10.3885/meo.2008.Res00257.
PMID: 20165535BACKGROUNDAdams KM, Kohlmeier M, Zeisel SH. Nutrition education in U.S. medical schools: latest update of a national survey. Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1537-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eab71b.
PMID: 20736683BACKGROUNDJensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, Hu FB, Hubbard VS, Jakicic JM, Kushner RF, Loria CM, Millen BE, Nonas CA, Pi-Sunyer FX, Stevens J, Stevens VJ, Wadden TA, Wolfe BM, Yanovski SZ; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Obesity Society. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2985-3023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 24239920BACKGROUNDChisholm A, Hart J, Mann KV, Harkness E, Peters S. Preparing medical students to facilitate lifestyle changes with obese patients: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):912-23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182580648.
PMID: 22622210BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Judith K Ockene, PhD
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2016
First Posted
April 1, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
November 30, 2020
Study Completion
November 30, 2022
Last Updated
May 17, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The investigators plan to share data through the project website, publications, and presentations to key organizations. The plan is also to share the use of research tools, such as surveys, OSCE cases, and curricula materials, developed over the course of the study. At this time there is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available.