BestFIT: a Personalized Weight Loss Program
Evaluating Options for Non-Responders: A SMART Approach to Enhancing Weight Loss
1 other identifier
interventional
468
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to learn how to personalize weight loss programs. In this research we will study:
- 1.Whether a weight loss counselor should decide if the traditional weight loss therapy is working either after 3 or 7 weekly sessions of therapy and
- 2.For those who haven't lost the expected amount of weight, whether it is more effective to add packaged meals to the traditional weight loss therapy or to change to an enhanced version of behavioral weight loss therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable obesity
Started May 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable obesity
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 3, 2021
CompletedDecember 3, 2021
July 1, 2019
3.9 years
February 6, 2015
June 13, 2020
December 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Weight Change
Weight change from baseline to 6 months and to 18 months among suboptimal responders to behavioral weight loss therapy.
6 months and 18 months after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Weight Change
6 and 18 months after baseline
Study Arms (3)
Behavioral weight loss therapy
EXPERIMENTALEmphasizes 1) identifying behaviors in need of change, 2) setting goals for change, 3) monitoring progress, 4) modifying environmental cues to facilitate change, and 5) modifying consequences to motivate change.
Portion-controlled meals
EXPERIMENTALFifty percent of participants who have not lost the expected amount of weight will be re-randomized to receive portion-controlled meals in addition to standard behavioral weight loss therapy.
Acceptance-based treatment
EXPERIMENTALFifty percent of participants who have not lost the expected amount of weight will be re-randomized to receive an enhanced version of behavioral weight loss therapy teaching acceptance-based behavioral skills.
Interventions
All participants start with behavioral weight loss therapy which consists of 20 weekly meetings wtih a weight loss coach. Session components will include weekly weigh-in, discussion of progress and challenges and discussion of scheduled session topic. Dietary goals and physical activity goals are set. After their first session, participants are randomized to have their weight assessed at either their 3rd session or their 7th session. Both the participant and their coach are blinded to the randomization. If the participant has lost the expected amount of weight, they continue with behavioral weight loss therapy for the full 20 session.
Participants continue with behavioral weight loss therapy, but this is augmented with portion-controlled meals (PCM). Adherence to energy intake goals is facilitated by consuming pre-prepared meals specifically designed to meet caloric intake guidelines. PCMs reduce individuals' motivationally- and self-regulatory-dependent planning and decision making around eating. PCMs also serve as a "teaching tool" regarding the amount and type of food people should eat in order to produce weight loss.
Switching the therapeutic approach to an enhanced behavioral weight loss therapy teaching acceptance-based behavioral skills theoretically addresses the root problem of many weight loss challenges and boosts long-term capacity for self-regulation. Acceptance based strategies are designed to help participants identify and internalize values and lasting commitment to behavior consistent with these values. The strategies focus on increasing people's ability to forgo more pleasurable options (e.g., hedonic pleasure of food) in favor of behavior that is distinctly less pleasurable or even aversive (remaining hungry, anxious, bored). The inability to tolerate such distress is directly associated with failure of self-regulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between the ages of 21 - 70
- BMI between 30 - 45 kg/m2
- Able to walk 2 blocks without stopping
- Able to attend measurement and intervention activities in the Twin Cities area in person for 18 months
You may not qualify if:
- Self-reported pregnancy or breastfeeding baby in last 6 months or planning a pregnancy in the next 18 months
- History of bariatric surgery
- Current or previous diagnosis of anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa
- Food allergies, intolerances
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- HealthPartners Institutelead
- Drexel Universitycollaborator
- University of Michigancollaborator
- University of Minnesotacollaborator
- University of Washingtoncollaborator
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
HealthPartners Institute
Bloomington, Minnesota, 55425, United States
Related Publications (11)
Carels RA, Darby L, Cacciapaglia HM, Douglass OM, Harper J, Kaplar ME, Konrad K, Rydin S, Tonkin K. Applying a stepped-care approach to the treatment of obesity. J Psychosom Res. 2005 Dec;59(6):375-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.060.
PMID: 16310019BACKGROUNDLei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K, Oslin D, Murphy SA. A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:21-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143152. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
PMID: 22224838BACKGROUNDCollins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.022.
PMID: 17466815BACKGROUNDButryn ML, Webb V, Wadden TA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;34(4):841-59. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.006.
PMID: 22098808BACKGROUNDRock CL, Flatt SW, Sherwood NE, Karanja N, Pakiz B, Thomson CA. Effect of a free prepared meal and incentivized weight loss program on weight loss and weight loss maintenance in obese and overweight women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1803-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1503. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
PMID: 20935338BACKGROUNDHeymsfield SB, van Mierlo CA, van der Knaap HC, Heo M, Frier HI. Weight management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and pooling analysis from six studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 May;27(5):537-49. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802258.
PMID: 12704397BACKGROUNDForman EM, Hoffman KL, McGrath KB, Herbert JD, Brandsma LL, Lowe MR. A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: an analog study. Behav Res Ther. 2007 Oct;45(10):2372-86. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
PMID: 17544361BACKGROUNDSherwood NE, Butryn ML, Forman EM, Almirall D, Seburg EM, Lauren Crain A, Kunin-Batson AS, Hayes MG, Levy RL, Jeffery RW. The BestFIT trial: A SMART approach to developing individualized weight loss treatments. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
PMID: 26825020BACKGROUNDEmery Tavernier RL, Mason SM, Levy RL, Seburg EM, Sherwood NE. Association of childhood abuse with behavioral weight-loss outcomes: Examining the mediating effect of binge eating severity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Jan;30(1):96-105. doi: 10.1002/oby.23320.
PMID: 34932887DERIVEDSherwood NE, Crain AL, Seburg EM, Butryn ML, Forman EM, Crane MM, Levy RL, Kunin-Batson AS, Jeffery RW. BestFIT Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Results: A SMART Approach to Developing Individualized Weight Loss Treatment Sequences. Ann Behav Med. 2022 Mar 1;56(3):291-304. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab061.
PMID: 34415011DERIVEDCrane MM, Seburg EM, Levy RL, Jeffery RW, Sherwood NE. Using targeting to recruit men and women of color into a behavioral weight loss trial. Trials. 2020 Jun 16;21(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04500-1.
PMID: 32546253DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Nancy Sherwood
- Organization
- University of Minnesota
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nancy E Sherwood, PhD
University of Minnesota
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
A. Lauren Crain, PhD
HealthPartners Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2015
First Posted
February 20, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2019
Last Updated
December 3, 2021
Results First Posted
December 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2019-07