Semi-automatic assessMent of Aortic Roots by Three-dimensional transoEsophageal echocaRdiography (SMARTER)
1 other identifier
observational
77
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The progress in surgery of the aortic root and the evolution of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical treatment in selected patients have refocused the need for quantitative imaging of the aortic root during transcatheter aortic valve replacement and valve-sparing aortic root surgery. In this study, we aim to assess the ability of semi-automated quantitative modeling (eSie Valves, Autovalve prototype version, Siemens Medical Solutions, USA) of the aortic valve and root in patients with clinical normal aortic valve and root, who are indicated for both 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomographic (CT) due to atrial fibrillation or patent foramen ovale. Measures of the aortic valve and root obtained by 2D TEE, 3D TEE and CT are compared, and the ability of the semi-automated 3D TEE modeling software is tested. Given the workflow advantages of automation, this 3D TEE approach may enhance the clinical adoption of routine 3-dimensional imaging beyond CT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 9, 2016
August 1, 2016
4 months
March 21, 2016
August 8, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy
Compare semi-automatic assessment of 3D TEE to CT measurement
Through study completion, an average of 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Cost
Through study completion, an average of 1 month
Labor time
Through study completion, an average of 1 month
Interventions
Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography, analysed by eSie valve software (Siemens)
Computed tomography, analysed by Synovia Workstation (Siemens)
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with clinical normal aortic valve and root, who are indicated for both transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomographic (CT) due to atrial fibrillation or patent foramen ovale.
You may qualify if:
- both transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomographic (CT) are referred by cardiologists
- apparent normal aortic valve and root structure
- written consent
You may not qualify if:
- post-operation of aortic valve
- severe cardiomyopathy
- cardiac functional insufficiency (NYHA III or IV)
- contraindications for either TEE or cardiac CT angiography
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fuwai Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China
Related Publications (5)
Garcia-Martin A, Lazaro-Rivera C, Fernandez-Golfin C, Salido-Tahoces L, Moya-Mur JL, Jimenez-Nacher JJ, Casas-Rojo E, Aquila I, Gonzalez-Gomez A, Hernandez-Antolin R, Zamorano JL. Accuracy and reproducibility of novel echocardiographic three-dimensional automated software for the assessment of the aortic root in candidates for thanscatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;17(7):772-8. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev204. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
PMID: 26320167BACKGROUNDCalleja A, Thavendiranathan P, Ionasec RI, Houle H, Liu S, Voigt I, Sai Sudhakar C, Crestanello J, Ryan T, Vannan MA. Automated quantitative 3-dimensional modeling of the aortic valve and root by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in normals, aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis: comparison to computed tomography in normals and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):99-108. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.976993. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
PMID: 23233743BACKGROUNDChambers JB, Myerson SG, Rajani R, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Dweck MR. Multimodality imaging in heart valve disease. Open Heart. 2016 Mar 8;3(1):e000330. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000330. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26977308BACKGROUNDHahn RT, Little SH, Monaghan MJ, Kodali SK, Williams M, Leon MB, Gillam LD. Recommendations for comprehensive intraprocedural echocardiographic imaging during TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):261-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.014.
PMID: 25772834BACKGROUNDZhang M, Wan L, Liu K, Wu W, Li H, Wang Y, Lu B, Wang H. Aortic roots assessment by an automated three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: an intra-individual comparison. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;35(11):2029-2036. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01664-z. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
PMID: 31297671DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hao Wang, M.D.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Weeks
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Director of Radiologic Imaging
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2016
First Posted
March 31, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share