NCT02724709

Brief Summary

The progress in surgery of the aortic root and the evolution of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical treatment in selected patients have refocused the need for quantitative imaging of the aortic root during transcatheter aortic valve replacement and valve-sparing aortic root surgery. In this study, we aim to assess the ability of semi-automated quantitative modeling (eSie Valves, Autovalve prototype version, Siemens Medical Solutions, USA) of the aortic valve and root in patients with clinical normal aortic valve and root, who are indicated for both 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomographic (CT) due to atrial fibrillation or patent foramen ovale. Measures of the aortic valve and root obtained by 2D TEE, 3D TEE and CT are compared, and the ability of the semi-automated 3D TEE modeling software is tested. Given the workflow advantages of automation, this 3D TEE approach may enhance the clinical adoption of routine 3-dimensional imaging beyond CT.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
77

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2016

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 31, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

August 9, 2016

Status Verified

August 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Automatic Data ProcessingThree-Dimensional EchocardiographyAortic Valve

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy

    Compare semi-automatic assessment of 3D TEE to CT measurement

    Through study completion, an average of 1 month

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Cost

    Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  • Labor time

    Through study completion, an average of 1 month

Interventions

Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography, analysed by eSie valve software (Siemens)

Computed tomography, analysed by Synovia Workstation (Siemens)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with clinical normal aortic valve and root, who are indicated for both transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomographic (CT) due to atrial fibrillation or patent foramen ovale.

You may qualify if:

  • both transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomographic (CT) are referred by cardiologists
  • apparent normal aortic valve and root structure
  • written consent

You may not qualify if:

  • post-operation of aortic valve
  • severe cardiomyopathy
  • cardiac functional insufficiency (NYHA III or IV)
  • contraindications for either TEE or cardiac CT angiography

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fuwai Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037, China

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Garcia-Martin A, Lazaro-Rivera C, Fernandez-Golfin C, Salido-Tahoces L, Moya-Mur JL, Jimenez-Nacher JJ, Casas-Rojo E, Aquila I, Gonzalez-Gomez A, Hernandez-Antolin R, Zamorano JL. Accuracy and reproducibility of novel echocardiographic three-dimensional automated software for the assessment of the aortic root in candidates for thanscatheter aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul;17(7):772-8. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev204. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

    PMID: 26320167BACKGROUND
  • Calleja A, Thavendiranathan P, Ionasec RI, Houle H, Liu S, Voigt I, Sai Sudhakar C, Crestanello J, Ryan T, Vannan MA. Automated quantitative 3-dimensional modeling of the aortic valve and root by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in normals, aortic regurgitation, and aortic stenosis: comparison to computed tomography in normals and clinical implications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):99-108. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.976993. Epub 2012 Dec 10.

    PMID: 23233743BACKGROUND
  • Chambers JB, Myerson SG, Rajani R, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Dweck MR. Multimodality imaging in heart valve disease. Open Heart. 2016 Mar 8;3(1):e000330. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000330. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 26977308BACKGROUND
  • Hahn RT, Little SH, Monaghan MJ, Kodali SK, Williams M, Leon MB, Gillam LD. Recommendations for comprehensive intraprocedural echocardiographic imaging during TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):261-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.014.

    PMID: 25772834BACKGROUND
  • Zhang M, Wan L, Liu K, Wu W, Li H, Wang Y, Lu B, Wang H. Aortic roots assessment by an automated three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: an intra-individual comparison. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;35(11):2029-2036. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01664-z. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Hao Wang, M.D.

    Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
2 Weeks
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor and Director of Radiologic Imaging

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2016

First Posted

March 31, 2016

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 1, 2016

Study Completion

August 1, 2016

Last Updated

August 9, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations