Anti-vasculaR Endothelial Growth Factor plUs Anti-angiopoietin 2 in Fixed comBination therapY: Evaluation for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema
RUBY
A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Doses of Intravitreal REGN910-3 in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
1 other identifier
interventional
302
1 country
51
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT)-administered REGN910-3 compared to intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in improving best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
51 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 3, 2018
CompletedOctober 3, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.4 years
March 14, 2016
July 10, 2018
October 1, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 12
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 12.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 36
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. BCVA score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 36.
Baseline, Week 36
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 12
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 36
Baseline, Week 36
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-step Improvement at Week 12 in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) From Baseline
Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-step Improvement at Week 36 in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) From Baseline
Baseline, Week 36
Study Arms (8)
REGN910-3 (3 mg: 2 mg)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (3 milligram (mg):2 mg) every 4 weeks (Q4) on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 for 3 initial doses followed by every Week 8 (Q8) dosing beginning at Week 16 up to Week 32.
REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to week 12.
Aflibercept 2 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12.
REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at Week 16 and Q8 through Week 32.
REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q12
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at Week 20 and Q12 through Week 32.
Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q8
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI at Week16 and Q8 through Week 32.
Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q12
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI at Week 20 and Q12 through Week 32.
Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at week 16 and Q8 through week 32.
Interventions
Co-formulation for intravitreal (IVT) injection consisting of REGN910 (nesvacumab) and REGN3 (aflibercept)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women ≥18 years of age with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus who have clinically significant DME with central involvement in the study eye
- BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 24 (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye
- Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
- Provide signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of macular edema due to any cause other than diabetes mellitus in either eye
- IVT anti-VEGF in the study eye within 12 weeks of the screening visit
- Panretinal laser photocoagulation or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months of screening
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticalslead
- Bayercollaborator
Study Sites (51)
Unknown Facility
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Arcadia, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Mountain View, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Oceanside, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Desert, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
New London, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Winter Haven, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
‘Aiea, Hawaii, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
New Albany, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Maine, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Rockville, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Jackson, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Florissant, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Edison, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Albany, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Florence, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
West Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Abilene, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Harlingen, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
The Woodlands, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Willow Park, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Washington, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trial Management
- Organization
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trial Management
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2016
First Posted
March 17, 2016
Study Start
March 2, 2016
Primary Completion
July 10, 2017
Study Completion
July 10, 2017
Last Updated
October 3, 2018
Results First Posted
October 3, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10