NCT02712008

Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT)-administered REGN910-3 compared to intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) in improving best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
302

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

51 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 2, 2016

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 14, 2016

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 10, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 10, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 3, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 3, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

March 14, 2016

Results QC Date

July 10, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 12

    Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 12.

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 36

    Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. BCVA score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 36.

    Baseline, Week 36

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 12

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 36

    Baseline, Week 36

  • Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-step Improvement at Week 12 in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) From Baseline

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-step Improvement at Week 36 in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) From Baseline

    Baseline, Week 36

Study Arms (8)

REGN910-3 (3 mg: 2 mg)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (3 milligram (mg):2 mg) every 4 weeks (Q4) on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 for 3 initial doses followed by every Week 8 (Q8) dosing beginning at Week 16 up to Week 32.

Drug: REGN910-3

REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to week 12.

Drug: REGN910-3

Aflibercept 2 mg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12.

Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)

REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at Week 16 and Q8 through Week 32.

Drug: REGN910-3

REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q12

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at Week 20 and Q12 through Week 32.

Drug: REGN910-3

Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q8

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI at Week16 and Q8 through Week 32.

Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)

Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q12

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI at Week 20 and Q12 through Week 32.

Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)

Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) at week 16 and Q8 through week 32.

Drug: REGN910-3Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI)

Interventions

Co-formulation for intravitreal (IVT) injection consisting of REGN910 (nesvacumab) and REGN3 (aflibercept)

Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8REGN910-3 (3 mg: 2 mg)REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg)REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q12REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8
Also known as: EYLEA® (aflibercept) Injection, BAY86-5321
Aflibercept 2 mgAflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q12Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to Aflibercept 2 mg Q8Aflibercept 2 mg Q4 to REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men or women ≥18 years of age with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus who have clinically significant DME with central involvement in the study eye
  • BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 24 (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye
  • Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
  • Provide signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Evidence of macular edema due to any cause other than diabetes mellitus in either eye
  • IVT anti-VEGF in the study eye within 12 weeks of the screening visit
  • Panretinal laser photocoagulation or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months of screening

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (51)

Unknown Facility

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arcadia, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mountain View, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oceanside, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Palm Desert, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New London, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

‘Aiea, Hawaii, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Maine, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jackson, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Florissant, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Edison, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Albany, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Florence, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Abilene, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Harlingen, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Willow Park, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

afliberceptInjections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Drug Administration RoutesDrug TherapyTherapeutics

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Trial Management
Organization
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Clinical Trial Management

    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2016

First Posted

March 17, 2016

Study Start

March 2, 2016

Primary Completion

July 10, 2017

Study Completion

July 10, 2017

Last Updated

October 3, 2018

Results First Posted

October 3, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Locations