Anti-angiOpoeitin 2 Plus Anti-vascular eNdothelial Growth Factor as a therapY for Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration: Evaluation of a fiXed Combination Intravitreal Injection
ONYX
A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Doses of Intravitreal REGN910-3 in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
1 other identifier
interventional
365
1 country
87
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT)-administered REGN910-3 compared to intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
87 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 31, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 3, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 7, 2019
CompletedMay 7, 2019
April 1, 2019
1.5 years
March 14, 2016
October 3, 2018
May 1, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 12
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 12.
At Week 12
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 36
Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at 4 meters. BCVA score was measured using an eye chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly at a testing distance of 4 meters using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Change from baseline calculated by subtracting baseline value from observed post-baseline value at Week 36.
At Week 36
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 12
At Week 12
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-field Retinal Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Week 36
At Week 36
Change From Baseline in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Area at Week 12
At Week 12
Change From Baseline in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Area at Week 36
At Week 36
Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Area at Week 12
At Week 12
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Proportion of Participants With No Retinal and/or Subretinal Fluid at Week 12
At Week 12
Proportion of Participants With No Retinal and/or Subretinal Fluid From Baseline Through Week 36
Baseline through Week 36
Time to No Retinal and/or Subretinal Fluid Through Week 36
Baseline through Week 36
Study Arms (3)
REGN910-3 (3 mg: 2 mg)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (3 milligram \[mg\]:2 mg) every 4 weeks (Q4) on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 8 for 3 initial doses followed by every Week 8 (Q8) dosing beginning at Week 16 up to Week 32.
REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8 or Q12 (beginning at Week 16 or Week 20) through Week 32.
Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were administered intravitreal injection of Aflibercept (IAI) 2 mg Q4 on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 for 3 initial doses up to Week 12. At Week 12, participants were re-randomized to receive IAI Q8 or Q12 (beginning at Week 16 or 20) or REGN910-3 (6 mg:2 mg) Q8 beginning at Week 16 through Week 32.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women ≥50 years of age with active subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, including juxtafoveal lesions that affect the fovea as evidenced by FA in the study eye as assessed by a central reading center
- BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 24 (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye.
- Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures.
- Provide signed informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of CNV due to any cause other than AMD in either eye
- Prior IVT anti-VEGF in the study eye
- Evidence of DME or diabetic retinopathy (defined as more than 1 microaneurysm) in either eye in diabetic patients
- Any history of macular hole of stage 2 and above in the study eye
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (87)
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 3
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Arcadia, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Bakersfield, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Encino, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Los Angeles, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Los Angeles, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mountain View, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Oceanside, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Palm Desert, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Palm Desert, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Palo Alto, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Poway, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Redlands, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Santa Maria, California, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
New London, Connecticut, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Altamonte Springs, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Lakeland, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Largo, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Naples, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Winter Haven, Florida, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
‘Aiea, Hawaii, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Lemont, Illinois, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Oak Forest, Illinois, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Oak Park, Illinois, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Urbana, Illinois, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
New Albany, Indiana, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Metairie, Louisiana, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Jackson, Michigan, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Edison, New Jersey, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Albany, New York, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Bloomfield, New York, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Great Neck, New York, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Hauppauge, New York, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Syracuse, New York, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Dublin, Ohio, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Ladson, South Carolina, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Abilene, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Austin, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Austin, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 1
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site 2
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Harlingen, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
The Woodlands, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Willow Park, Texas, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Regeneron Investigational Site
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trial Management
- Organization
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trial Management
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2016
First Posted
March 18, 2016
Study Start
March 31, 2016
Primary Completion
October 3, 2017
Study Completion
October 3, 2017
Last Updated
May 7, 2019
Results First Posted
May 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04