ANI and NoL Index Variations After Standard Nociceptive Stimulus at 0, 50, 25 % of Inhaled N2O in the Anesthetic Mixture
Assessment of the Intraoperative Analgesic Effect of 50%/50% N2O/O2 Inhalation by the Pain Index ANI Following a Standardized Electrical Stimulus in Patients Under Anesthesia. Comparison to the New NoL Analgesic Index.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
N2O has been used during general anesthesia (GA) for more than 100 years. It is known to have anesthetic agents sparing effect. But small is know on his real analgesic effect during GA. So far, the only way to monitor pain during GA was based on vital signs that are not specific and not sensitive. Few devices tried to evaluated pain under GA during the last 2 decades. More recently, better devices were proposed such as the Physiodoloris device and the PMD200 device. The first offers an index called ANI based on heart rate variability (HRV) assessment. The second offers the NoL index based on the analysis of 5 parameters. The aim of the present study is to evaluate quantitatively the analgesic index of N2O during GA using the two indices ANI and NoL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 pain
Started Jan 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 18, 2016
November 1, 2016
11 months
March 2, 2016
November 16, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ANI variation after stimulation in patients under GA at End-Tidal N2O 0% and 50%.
The same patient is anesthetized without N2O in the gas mixture first. The first standard stimulus is applied on the forearm of the patient when the N2O concentration in the anesthesia mixture is at 0%. ANI response to the stimulus is recorded. Then N2O is slowly increased to reached et-N2O 50% in the anesthesia mixture. Then, at ET-N2O 50%, the same standard stimulus is applied and ANI variations registered.
First stimulus is applied when the patient breaths 0% N2O in his anesthesia mixture. Second stimulus is applied at 50% End-Tidal N2O in the anesthesia mixture during the surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
NoL index variation after electrical stimulation in patients under GA atEnd-Tidal N2O 0% and 50%.
First stimulus is applied when the patient breaths 0% N2O in his anesthesia mixture. Second stimulus is applied at 50% End-Tidal N2O in the anesthesia mixture during the surgery.
ANI and NoL indices variations after the same standard stimulus when ET-N2O is slowly decreased from 50% to 25%, , then to 0%.
Within the same anesthesia and surgery
Study Arms (1)
N2O exposure
OTHERThere is only one arm in this study. All patients under General Anesthesia are exposed to 4 different doses or concentrations of inhaled N2O that is combined with the anesthetic desflurane. Each patient will be submitted to the standard nociceptive stimulus when inhaled N2O is at 0, 50, 25, and finally back to 0%. ANI and NoL Indices variations between "before stimulus" and "after stimulus" at each N2O concentration will be assessed and compared. This will allow to demonstrate an analgesic effect (less variations of ANI and NoL) when inhaled N2O is high (50%) testifying for the analgesic effect of this gas N2O.
Interventions
The aim of this study is to evaluate the nociceptive response to a standardized forearm electrical stimulus applied to patients under GA, during surgery, at different End-Tidal concentrations of N2O (ET-N2O: 0%-50%-25%-0%), and to see if ANI and NoL indices show less pain when inhaled N2O is higher.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA status I, II or III
- Patients aged 18 to 70 years
- Laparotomy for gynecological or bowel surgery
- Duration and type of surgery requiring an epidural analgesia via an epidural catheter placed prior the general anesthesia induction and an arterial line placed after induction of general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- When 100% O2 ventilation is required during anesthesia (except for the induction phase during which all the patients receive O2 100%).
- Patients having received intraocular injection of gas (such as SF6, C3F8, C2F6) within 3 months prior to the present surgery.
- Any condition where internal entrapped air could expand and become dangerous, such as:
- head injury within 6 months prior to surgery
- maxillofacial injuries within 6 months prior to surgery
- pneumothorax within 6 months prior to surgery
- gas embolism within 6 months prior to surgery
- decompression sickness within 6 months prior to surgery
- bubbles of emphysema known for this patient
- middle ear, inner ear and sinus surgery
- major abdominal distension/occlusion and emergent surgery for intestinal obstruction
- if air has been injected into the epidural space to determine the placement of the needle for epidural anesthesia (only saline is used in our center for the loss of resistance technique to place the catheter into the epidural space)
- Any contra-indication or patient's refusal for epidural placement
- Unexpected difficult airway requesting excessive, possibly painful airway manipulations.
- Unexpected surgical complications requiring strong haemodynamic support (transfusions, volume challenges, vasopressors, inotropic drugs).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T2M4, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Coulombe MA, Decary E, Maximos S, Brulotte V, Drolet P, Tanoubi I, Issa R, Zaphiratos V, Verdonck O, Fortier LP, Godin N, Idrissi M, Raft J, Richebe P. Assessing the antinociceptive effect of nitrous oxide to tetanic stimulation in anaesthetised patients with new intra-operative nociception monitors: An observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 May 1;38(5):512-523. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001431.
PMID: 33399383DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippe Richebe, MD PhD
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor of Anesthesiology and Pain medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2016
First Posted
March 8, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share