Trial of an Oral Sucrose Solution Versus Placebo in Children 1 to 3 Months Old Needing Nasopharyngeal Aspiration
A Randomized Double-blind Trial Comparing the Effect on Pain of an Oral Sucrose Solution Versus Placebo in Children 1 to 3 Months Old Needing Nasopharyngeal Aspiration
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Early recognition and treatment of pain among children is important for their cognitive development and their future response to pain throughout their life. Oral sweet solutions have been accepted as effective pain reducing agents for procedures in the neonatal population. To date, there have been a limited number of published clinical trials in an emergency setting studying this type of intervention among infants undergoing venous puncture and bladder catheterization. These studies have reported conflicting results. No previous studies have evaluated the utilization of sucrose to manage pain during nasopharyngeal aspiration. Objective: To compare the efficacy of an oral sucrose solution versus placebo in reducing pain in children one to three months of age during nasopharyngeal aspiration in the Emergency Department.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 pain
Started Feb 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 22, 2015
December 1, 2015
3.8 years
February 29, 2012
December 21, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in pains scores related to nasopharyngeal aspiration
one minute
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difference in pain scores related to nasopharyngeal aspiration
3 minutes
Study Arms (2)
sucrose po
EXPERIMENTALplacebo po
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants from one to three months (one month or more but less than three months old) of actual age (not corrected) requiring a nasopharyngeal aspiration as a part of their planned ED management during weekdays from 8h to 16h.
You may not qualify if:
- Preterm infants (i.e. born \<37 weeks)
- Chronic cardio-pulmonary condition
- Assisted ventilation (such as tracheostomy or oxygen dependance)
- Technology dependant (such as enteral feeding tubes)
- Oropharyngeal malformation or dysfunction (such as cleft palate or micrognatia)
- Previous participation in this study
- Painful procedures in the preceding 60 minutes (bladder catheterization, vesical puncture, lumbar puncture, capillary blood tests)
- Parental language barrier (French and/or English)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Ste-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H3T1C5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Serge Gouin, MDCM, FRCPC
St. Justine's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2012
First Posted
March 6, 2012
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 22, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12