NCT02678416

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate two experimental pain models to see if they would be useful for comparing different products for reduction in pain intensity. The models evaluated were the ultraviolet-B (UVB) burn and intradermal capsaicin experimental pain models. Medications compared were a single dose each, of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen, oral acetaminophen, placebo, and IV morphine.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
79

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 7, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 13, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 13, 2016

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

February 5, 2016

Results QC Date

June 28, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 22, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

comparison

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Part 1: Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity at Hour 6 Using the Thermal Suprathreshold Pain in the Ultraviolet-B (UVB) Burn Pain Model

    The UVB burn pain model is a validated screening tool for pain killers in clinical drug development. A temperature of 50 degrees centigrade (°C) is used to burn the participant for 5 seconds. Then the participant rates his pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain). That score is recorded as baseline. Then the participant rates his pain again six hours after taking the assigned medication. The average at baseline is subtracted from the average at hour 6. Because this is a measure of reduction in pain intensity, a higher score is better (it means there is more pain relief).

    within 6 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Part 2: Observed Thermal Suprathreshold Pain Intensity in the UVB Burn Area

    within 6 hours

Study Arms (4)

IV Acetaminophen

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants receive IV acetaminophen as one of 4 interventions in random sequence

Drug: IV Acetaminophen (Treatment A)Drug: Placebo (Treatment C)

Oral Acetaminophen

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants receive oral acetaminophen as one of 4 interventions in random sequence

Drug: Oral Acetaminophen (Treatment B)Drug: Placebo (Treatment C)

Placebo

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants receive placebo as one of 4 interventions in random sequence

Drug: Placebo (Treatment C)

Morphine

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants receive morphine as one of 4 interventions in random sequence

Drug: Placebo (Treatment C)Other: Morphine (Treatment D)

Interventions

Acetaminophen administered by intravenous (IV) infusion

Also known as: OFIRMEV
IV Acetaminophen

Acetaminophen administered by oral tablets

Also known as: Acetaminophen tablets
Oral Acetaminophen

Placebo administered by IV infusion or oral tablets

Also known as: IV Placebo, Placebo tablets
IV AcetaminophenMorphineOral AcetaminophenPlacebo

Morphine administered by IV infusion

Also known as: IV Morphine
Morphine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Must have a health status of "healthy" assessed by the investigator and defined as no clinically significant deviation from normal medical history, physical examination, vital signs, and clinical laboratory determinations.
  • Must be male, Caucasian, between 18 and 55 years of age (inclusive) at the time of the screening.
  • Must have a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 19.0 and ≤ 30.0 kg/m2 with a minimum weight of 110 pounds (50 kg) at screening.

You may not qualify if:

  • A positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (surface antigen), or hepatitis C virus antibody at Screening.
  • A history of any drug allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to acetaminophen, morphine, or capsaicin or to any of the excipients in the IV or oral formulations used.
  • A positive test result for drugs of abuse, alcohol, or cotinine.
  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type V or VI (based on a Skin Type score of greater than 30.
  • A history of conditions which might be specifically contraindicated or require caution to be used during the administration of any drug in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pharmaceuticals Research Associates, Inc. (PRA)

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

AcetaminophenMorphine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Information Call Center
Organization
Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals

Study Officials

  • Global Clinical Leader

    Mallinckrodt

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2016

First Posted

February 9, 2016

Study Start

December 7, 2015

Primary Completion

June 13, 2016

Study Completion

June 13, 2016

Last Updated

February 5, 2020

Results First Posted

December 20, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations