NCT02693405

Brief Summary

Significant advances in primary malignant brain tumors (PBT) treatment have led to dramatically improved survival, both in children and adults. However, survival has not come without a cost and aggressive treatment methods associated with significant long-term adverse effects, often referred to as "late effects" (Panigrahy \& Blüml, 2009). These effects are the medical, physical, cognitive and psychosocial sequelae associated with cancer and its treatments that generally emerge two to five years after treatment ends (e.g., Landier \& Bhatia, 2008). The most serious challenge survivors of brain tumors face may be cognitive dysfunction. One especially important cognitive domain is executive functioning, which refers to essential factors such as problem-solving, goal-directed behavior and the ability to maintain stable interpersonal relationships (Lezak et al., 2004). Despite the potential impact of executive impairments on behavioral regulation and quality of life, few studies were conducted with survivors of PBT specifically for the assessment of executive functioning. Another fundamental neuro-cognitive domain is social cognition, which refers to the ability to understand the intentions and beliefs of others (Frith \& Singer, 2008). Social cognitive deficits are expected to impair autonomy and relationships, but scarce attention has been devoted to the study of social cognition in survivors of PBT and no study has attempted to compare socio-cognitive data and measures of health-related quality of life. It is noteworthy that executive function and socio-cognitive skills improve throughout childhood and adolescence, and improvements in these skills have frequently been attributed to maturation of the brain, especially the prefrontal cortex (e.g., Tamnes et al., 2010). This suggests a greater impact of the disease and its treatment on these functions in children/adolescents.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 5, 2016

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2016

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

February 5, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • performances in executive tasks and executive questionnaires

    Executive functions will be assessed using executive cognitive tasks (Stroop task for inhibition, Modified Card Sorting Task for mental flexibility, Digit spans for working memory) and questionnaires (BRIEF for childrens and BRIEF-A for adults) for executive behavioral measures. Standardized norms in French are available for these tasks, which permit determining if the performances are pathological. So, these multiple measurements will be aggregated to determine the number of patients with pathological performances for executive tasks (tasks and questionaires).

    2 years

  • performances in social cognition tasks

    The first task involves a mental representation or belief about the state of the world (eg, Samson, 2012). The items offered in this kind of task are used to assess the ability to understand that the belief to infer in a type of scenario does not correspond to the reality. The second task will be the Faux Pas task (Stone et al., 1998). This task is composed of written scenarios and the subject must detect if someone has done or said something he should not have said- the "faux pas". If the subject detects that there was a faux pas, additional questions are asked to detect whether he/she understands the cognitive side and the emotional side of the faux pas. Standardized norms in French are available for these tasks, which permit determining if the performances are pathological. These multiple measurements will be aggregated to determine the number of patients with pathological performances.

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • quality of life questionnaires

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

child and adult survivors of brain tumor

EXPERIMENTAL

Executive functions and social cognition will be assessed using cognitive (Stroop task, Modified Card Sorting Task, Digit spans) and behavioral (BRIEF for childrens and BRIEF-A for adults) tests. Quality of life will be assessed by questionaires (SF-36, QLQC30-BN20 for adults and Peds-Ql for childrens)

Other: Executive functionsOther: social cognitionOther: quality of life

healthy controls

EXPERIMENTAL

Executive functions and social cognition will be assessed using cognitive (Stroop task, Modified Card Sorting Task, Digit spans) and behavioral (BRIEF for childrens and BRIEF-A for adults) tests. Quality of life will be assessed by questionaires (SF-36, QLQC30-BN20 for adults and Peds-Ql for childrens)

Other: Executive functionsOther: social cognitionOther: quality of life

Interventions

measures of executive functioning with tasks

child and adult survivors of brain tumorhealthy controls

measures of socio-cognitive functioning with tasks

child and adult survivors of brain tumorhealthy controls

measures of quality of life with questionnaires

child and adult survivors of brain tumorhealthy controls

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 59 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 8 and 59
  • Children/adolescents and adults who have been treated by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and/or neurosurgery, subsequent to the diagnosis of a primary brain tumor
  • The end of treatment must be comprised between 2 and 5 years at the time of the assessment, as argued above.

You may not qualify if:

  • Sensory disturbances (e.g., visual, auditory) incompatible with the achievement of the tasks
  • Language or praxis deficits inconsistent with the achievement of the tasks
  • Neurological disease other than PBT
  • secondary brain tumor
  • Psychiatric history (consultation with a psychiatrist of the University Hospital if doubt)
  • Insufficient French language proficiency

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Angers

Angers, France

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • Frith CD, Singer T. The role of social cognition in decision making. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3875-86. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0156.

    PMID: 18829429BACKGROUND
  • Landier W, Bhatia S. Cancer survivorship: a pediatric perspective. Oncologist. 2008 Nov;13(11):1181-92. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0104. Epub 2008 Nov 5.

    PMID: 18987046BACKGROUND
  • Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., & Loring, D.W. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Panigrahy A, Bluml S. Neuroimaging of pediatric brain tumors: from basic to advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Child Neurol. 2009 Nov;24(11):1343-65. doi: 10.1177/0883073809342129.

    PMID: 19841424BACKGROUND
  • Tamnes CK, Ostby Y, Walhovd KB, Westlye LT, Due-Tonnessen P, Fjell AM. Neuroanatomical correlates of executive functions in children and adolescents: a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of cortical thickness. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2496-508. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.024. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

    PMID: 20434470BACKGROUND
  • Caissie A, Nguyen J, Chen E, Zhang L, Sahgal A, Clemons M, Kerba M, Arnalot PF, Danjoux C, Tsao M, Barnes E, Holden L, Danielson B, Chow E. Quality of life in patients with brain metastases using the EORTC QLQ-BN20+2 and QLQ-C15-PAL. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 15;83(4):1238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.025. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

    PMID: 22172909BACKGROUND
  • Pulenzas N, Khan L, Tsao M, Zhang L, Lechner B, Thavarajah N, Barnes E, Danjoux C, Holden L, Lauzon N, Sheehan P, Bedard G, Chow E. Fatigue scores in patients with brain metastases receiving whole brain radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jul;22(7):1757-63. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2140-4. Epub 2014 Feb 9.

    PMID: 24510194BACKGROUND
  • Samson, D. (2012). Neuropsychologie de la théorie de l'esprit chez l'adulte : Etat de l'art et implications cliniques. In P. Allain, G. Aubin & D. L. Gall (Eds.), Cognition sociale et neuropsychologie (pp. 47-63). Marseille: Solal

    BACKGROUND
  • Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT. Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Sep;10(5):640-56. doi: 10.1162/089892998562942.

    PMID: 9802997BACKGROUND
  • Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.

    PMID: 1593914BACKGROUND
  • Cantisano N, Menei P, Roualdes V, Seizeur R, Allain P, Le Gall D, Roy A, Dinomais M, Laurent A, Besnard J. Relationships between executive functioning and health-related quality of life in adult survivors of brain tumor and matched healthy controls. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2021 Dec;43(10):980-990. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2040432. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Neoplasms

Interventions

Quality of Life

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsNervous System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Health StatusDemographyEpidemiologic MeasurementsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Jeremy Besnard, PhD

    University of Angers

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2016

First Posted

February 26, 2016

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion

September 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 1, 2018

Last Updated

May 3, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations