The PACO Project: A Clinical Study of a PAtient COach Program in Vulnerable Lung Cancer Patients
PACO
The PACO Project: A Randomized Clinical Study of a PAtient COach Program in Vulnerable Lung Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
306
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The randomized trial evaluates whether assigning a patient coach to vulnerable lung cancer patients will empower these patients to participate in the treatment decision process, help patients navigate the health care system while undergoing treatment and adhere to cancer treatment and to recommendations for supportive care. Half of the participants will receive standard care and be offered a patient coach while the other half will receive standard care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Jan 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 22, 2016
February 1, 2016
2.8 years
January 21, 2016
February 15, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Receipt of first-line treatment according to clinical guidelines reported as a binary variable (yes/no)
Optimal first line treatment will be defined according to TNM status and performance status and categorized receipt of first-line treatment as binary variable (yes/no).
20 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Differences between groups in overall quality of life using the generic EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (overall quality of life and functioning levels) and the lung cancer specific questionnaire QLQ-LC13 (symptoms)
Then questionnaire will be distributed 3 times: 1) At treatment start (inclusion and baseline assessment), 2) end of treatment, approx. 20- 24 weeks after start of treatment (FU1) 3) one month after end of first line treatment (FU2)
Differences between groups in patient knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management as assessed by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) questionnaire
The questionnaire will be distributed 3 times: At treatment start (inclusion and baseline assessment), 2) end of treatment, approx. 20- 24 weeks after start of treatment (FU1) 3) one month after end of first line treatment (FU2)
Differences between groups in patients beliefs in the ability to deal efficiently with a wide range of stressors as assessed by the General Self-Efficacy Scale questionnaire
The questionnaire will be distributed 3 times: At treatment start (inclusion and baseline assessment), 2) end of treatment, approx. 20- 24 weeks after start of treatment (FU1) 3) one month after end of first line treatment (FU2)
Participation in self-management plans regarding smoking cessation reported as binary variable (yes/no) as assessed by a study specific questionnaire and medical records
The outcome will be assessed at FU2 (one month after end of first line treatment)
Differences between groups in depression and anxiety as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
The questionnaire will be distributed 3 times: At treatment start (inclusion and baseline assessment), 2) end of treatment, approx. 20- 24 weeks after start of treatment (FU1) 3) one month after end of first line treatment (FU2)
Study Arms (2)
Patient coach
EXPERIMENTALStandard care and patient coach. 5 face-to-face sessions of approximately 1-2 hours duration and 3 phone calls from inclusion to one month after end of first line treatment. Deviations from this schedule might depend on the treatment modules and on the wishes and needs of the patient. Several patients will continue directly into palliative care and the coach will thus support this transition.
Standard treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard care.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer or small cell lung cancer
- Referred for further treatment at the oncology ward OR
You may not qualify if:
- Dementia
- Being institutionalized
- No proficiency of Danish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Danish Cancer Societylead
- University of Copenhagencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Herlev, 2730, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susanne O Dalton, Senior researcher
Danish Cancer Society Research Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2016
First Posted
February 22, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2018
Study Completion
October 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02