NCT02531464

Brief Summary

Family caregivers play a crucial role in cancer patients care, as they are their principal source of support. It is well recommended to provide them with the resources, information and support needed to maintain a good health, and to sustain their caregiving role. Recently, oncology centres have implemented systematic distress screening programs, but the focus has been limited to cancer patients, with little intervention on family caregivers. This study aims to address this gap. It will implement and test the effectiveness of a simple intervention integrating primary care and oncology care that transfers into practice the main recommendations of governmental authorities and experts to globally improve supportive care. The intervention includes systematic distress screening and problems assessment of family caregivers at diagnosis, and every two months, privileged contact with a nurse away from the patient to address caregivers distress and identified problems, and for caregivers experiencing high level of distress, liaison by the study nurse with their family physician to transfer information on their identified problems and level of distress and to facilitate shared follow-up. This intervention has been pilot-tested with family caregivers, health care providers and decision makers involved in lung cancer care, as well as with community-based family physicians, to ensure its feasibility and acceptability. This study findings may clearly improve patient and caregiver experience of cancer care, and reduce the burden of disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
109

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2015

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 24, 2015

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

July 15, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

family caregiverquality of lifesupportive caredistress screeningneeds assessment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in the mean score of distress (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale)

    Measured by the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)

    Baseline, after 3, 6 and 9 months

  • Change in the mean score of distress (Psychological distress scale used in the Quebec Health Survey)

    Measured by the Psychological distress scale used in the Quebec Health Survey

    Baseline, after, 3, 6 and 9 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in the preparedness for Caregiving (8-item validated instrument)

    Baseline, after 3, 6 and 9 months

  • Change in the caregiver's Burden Scale in End of Life Care

    Baseline, after 3, 6 and 9 months

  • Change in the family caregiver needs (Home Caregiver Need Survey)

    Baseline, after 3, 6 and 9 months

  • Change in the family caregiver quality of life ( City-of-Hope Quality of Life Scale-Family Version)

    Baseline, after 3, 6 and 9 months

  • Variation in service and health care resource utilization

    Baseline, after 3, 6 and 9 months

Study Arms (2)

Experimental: supportive care

EXPERIMENTAL

Family caregivers (FC) in the experimental arm (supportive care) will be exposed to a multi-faceted intervention to help them cope with their caregiving role, support them and respond to their needs; the intervention includes 3 components: 1) systematic distress screening and problems assessment of FCs at 2-month interval during the study period; 2) privileged contact with an oncology nurse away from the patient to further identify and address FCs' problems; 3) liaison by the oncology nurse with the family physician of FCs fwho will have reported high distress or needing help

Other: Supportive care

Control: usual care

NO INTERVENTION

In the control arm (usual care), FCs will assist to their relative initial visit to the pivot nurse in oncology (PNO) . The PNO screens patients for distress and assesses their needs. She does a bio-psycho-social comprehensive evaluation and may provide help and information. She responds to questions and refers to appropriate resources, staying available for patients and their FCs throughout the cancer care trajectory. However, most PNO interventions target the patient, with no systematic distress screening and problems assessment for FCs, nor any service and resource specifically dedicated to them. If FCs clearly express distress or particular needs, the PNO will address them or refer to appropriate resources, but, in usual care, only few FCs receive support services

Interventions

Systematic distress screening and needs assessment of family caregivers of patients with lung cancer

Experimental: supportive care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Relative identified by patients diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer as their principal family caregiver; having a family physician

You may not qualify if:

  • Cognitive disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ)

Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Aubin M, Vezina L, Verreault R, Simard S, Desbiens JF, Tremblay L, Dumont S, Fillion L, Dogba MJ, Gagnon P. Effectiveness of an intervention to improve supportive care for family caregivers of patients with lung cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2044-y.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Interventions

Palliative Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and Services

Study Officials

  • Michele Aubin, MD, PhD

    Laval University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2015

First Posted

August 24, 2015

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 31, 2017

Study Completion

December 31, 2017

Last Updated

August 13, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Locations