NCT04506359

Brief Summary

Although there is a relatively better prognosis, the 5-year survival rate for early stage lung cancer (Stage I, II, IIIA) is still relatively low compared to those other types of cancer. These patients might suffer lots from the uncertainty and substantial disease and treatment related physical changes. The investigator aims to (1) Develop and construct the contents, related patient education materials and computerized systems of the three evidence and service-based lung cancer care programs, including (a) Control as usual care (UC+ case manager care, or Control group), and (b) Computer Assisted OPD Personalized Supportive Care Program (UC+COPSCCP or Ex group); and (2) Compare the effects of Ex and care as usual (receiving usual care and case manager care) on self-report quality of life (QOL), physical symptoms, physical function and fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in newly diagnosed early-stage lung cancer patients. Eligible patients will be newly diagnosed early stage lung cancer patients (patients in stage I, II, \& IIIA) who have received surgery. A 2-group randomized control trial (RCT) matching with cancer stages will be conducted. For the COPSCCP, patients will be intervened for 6 months from the first time during hospitalization of receiving surgery or before hospital discharge and then OPD intervention. Each patient will be followed 6 time points for 2 years (will be drop and refer to medical oncology while having recurrence, metastasis or death): baseline (pre-discharge from hospital) and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge from hospital, T1-T6, respectively. The outcomes indicators will include: psychological variables, physical/disease variables, symptoms, lung function, and recurrence rate during 2 years. The estimated subjects would be 150 for each group, totally 300 subjects recruited in the beginning of the study. Results would be analyzed mainly by GEE and survival analysis. IRB approval will be received before the RCT. The investigator expects to develop and test the supportive cancer care interventions and generalize the interventions into the cancer care system after the study if prove good outcomes.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable lung-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 22, 2016

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 10, 2020

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 5, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

8.7 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Lung cancerPersonalized Supportive Cancer Care ProgramPhysical symptomFear of cancer recurrence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Changes in Quality of Life EORTC QLQ C30

    Quality of life will be assessed by the EORTC-QLQ. This Instrument is consists of 30 items to measure three subscales, includes 2 items global health status/quality of life, 15 items functional domains and 13 items cancer common related symptoms or problems. Two items in global health status use a 7-point summated scale (1 = poor; 7 = excellent) and other items are rated on 4-point Likert's Scales (1=not at all; 4=very much). The scores will be transformed to a range from 0 to 100. In global health status and functional domains, the higher scores indicate better function. In the symptoms subscale, lower scores indicate less severe symptoms (Aaronson et al., 1993). The Taiwan Chinese version has been demonstrated to be both reliable and valid (Chie et al., 2004).

    Outcome Assessments will be conducted for 6 times, the first time is at one day after tumor excision surgery (T1) and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months (T2-6) after surgery.

  • Changes in psychological distress

    The severity of lung cancer patients' anxiety and depression will be measured by the self-reporting HADS. The 14 items of HADS consists of two subscales, include 7 items anxiety and 7 items depression. The score of all items ranges from 0 (not at all) to 3 (always) and the total score of each subscale are ranged from 0 to 21, a higher score indicates a higher level of anxiety or depression. Satisfactory psychometrics of the HADS has been shown in cancer populations in Taiwan (Chen etal. 1999).

    Outcome Assessments will be conducted for 6 times, the first time is at one day after tumor excision surgery (T1) and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months (T2-6) after surgery.

  • Changes in Fear of Recurrence

    The FoR-C is a Chinese version of the original FoR questionnaire1-3. The FoR questionnaire consists of six statements with a five-point response scale from not at all (1), a little, sometimes (2), a lot , and all the time) and one statement with a response scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). The summary of FoR was range from 6 to 40. Higher score indicates a higher level of fear of recurrence. The significance of the FoR was indicated by patients' responses 'a lot' or 'all the time' for the first six statements and the score of 7-10 for the last item, in which case. Current study will use the same approach to determine the cut-off point of the FoR.

    Outcome Assessments will be conducted for 6 times, the first time is at one day after tumor excision surgery (T1) and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months (T2-6) after surgery.

  • Changes in Sleep Quality (SDQ)

    The quality of lung cancer patients' sleep will be measured by SDQ. The 12 items of SDQ was designed to evaluate patient' insomnia experience. Respondent score use a five-point Likert's scale (1 never true, 5 very often true) to indicate how often certain statements about insomnia. Higher scores reflect more dysfunctional beliefs about the causes and correlates of insomnia (Espie et al, 1989).

    Outcome Assessments will be conducted for 6 times, the first time is at one day after tumor excision surgery (T1) and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months (T2-6) after surgery.

  • Changes in Brief Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS)

    The SCNS consists of 5 domains, include psychological, health system and information, daily living, patient care and sexuality domain. Response options "No need, not applicable (1); No need, satisfied (2); Low need (3); Moderate need (4); High need (5). The sum of item scores within each domain will be calculated and the scores will be transformed to a standardized score 0 to 100, higher score indicate moreunmet needs (Girgis et al, 2011). The higher scores representing more unmet needs. The Chinese SCNS34 has acceptable psychometric properties in previous lung cancer studies (Liao et al., 2011; Shun et al., 2014).

    Outcome Assessments will be conducted for 6 times, the first time is at one day after tumor excision surgery (T1) and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months (T2-6) after surgery.

  • Changes in Muscle Power

    Patients' muscle strength (grip strength) of right and left hands will be assessed using Jamar Plus+ Digital Hand Dynamometer. Muscle endurance of right and left upper limbs and hip flexor muscle will be assessed using MicroFET2. Both grip strength meter and microFET 2 provided good reliability and validity for measuring muscle strength in the past studies. This measures has been applied in PI's currently head and neck study and early stage lung cancer follow up study.

    Outcome Assessments will be conducted for 6 times, the first time is at one day after tumor excision surgery (T1) and 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months (T2-6) after surgery.

Study Arms (2)

control group

NO INTERVENTION

Control Group: Usual care +case manager care, UC group or Control group

experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental group is COPSCCP+ UC+ case manager care. In this group, a 6-month intervention providing for each time while subject visit their chest surgeon(s) in the OPD (from the first time before hospital discharge/T1) - usually patients visited hospital in 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months (T2-6) after surgery. Patients will receive (a) nurse-guided touch-screen computer screening (assessment) for their psychological and physical distress and care needs during current week; (b) the screening /assessment results will immediately show as the outcome (we are developing a calculation system to sum those scores).

Other: Experimental Group

Interventions

The Ex group is COPSCCP+ UC+ case manager care. In this group, a 6-month intervention providing for each time while subject visit their chest surgeon(s) in the OPD (from the first time before hospital discharge/T1).

experimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age ≥20 years
  • early stage lung cancer
  • had tumor excision surgery
  • Mandarin / Chinese-reading and speaking

You may not qualify if:

  • had double cancer
  • had cancer recurrence or metastasis
  • primary cancer unknown
  • conscious unclear

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.

    PMID: 8433390BACKGROUND
  • Chie WC, Yang CH, Hsu C, Yang PC. Quality of life of lung cancer patients: validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13. Qual Life Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):257-62. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015295.74812.06.

    PMID: 15058806BACKGROUND
  • Chen ML, Chang HK, Yeh CH. Anxiety and depression in Taiwanese cancer patients with and without pain. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):944-51.

    PMID: 11095234BACKGROUND
  • Espie CA, Brooks DN, Lindsay WR. An evaluation of tailored psychological treatment of insomnia. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1989 Jun;20(2):143-53. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(89)90047-5.

    PMID: 2685045BACKGROUND
  • Girgis A, Lambert S, Lecathelinais C. The supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers of cancer survivors: development and psychometric evaluation. Psychooncology. 2011 Apr;20(4):387-93. doi: 10.1002/pon.1740. Epub 2010 Apr 5.

    PMID: 20878835BACKGROUND
  • Liao YC, Liao WY, Shun SC, Yu CJ, Yang PC, Lai YH. Symptoms, psychological distress, and supportive care needs in lung cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Nov;19(11):1743-51. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1014-7. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

    PMID: 20949362BACKGROUND
  • Shun SC, Yeh KH, Liang JT, Huang J, Chen SC, Lin BR, Lee PH, Lai YH. Unmet supportive care needs of patients with colorectal cancer: significant differences by type D personality. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Jan 1;41(1):E3-11. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.E3-E11.

    PMID: 24368251BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Yeur-Hur Lai, Professor

    School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Yeur-Hur Lai, Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Triple (Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) This study was not fully blinded; however, the group allocation was concealed from the patient and primary researcher until after baseline assessments were completed. A primary researcher obtained patient consent, collected selfreported assessments, and if the patients were randomized to intervention group, the intervention trainer explained the exercise program to participants. The study statistician and data managers remained blinded at all times.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a randomized controlled clinical trial which to compare the short term and long-term effects of the COPSCCP vs. the control group as usual group on early stage lung cancer patients. For both groups, we assessed patients' outcomes (including baseline data) for 6 times (T1=baseline/during hospitalization of receiving surgery \& before their hospital; T2 to T6 = 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months after discharge from hospital).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2018

First Posted

August 10, 2020

Study Start

April 22, 2016

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

June 5, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations