Surgical Site Infection in Caesarean Section Using Alexis O Compared to Metal Retractors
To Investigate the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Low Risk Women Having a First Time Planned Caesarean Section Using the Alexis O Retractor and the Traditional Metal Retractor
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Objective: To investigate if the use of the newly designed Alexis O Retractor leads to improved intra-operative and post-operative surgical outcomes in the setting of planned elective Caesarean Sections. Study Design: This ethically approved study is designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial in planned, first time Caesarean Sections with 200 patients randomized to either the Alexis-O Retractor group or the conventional group. Patients with wound healing problems, connective tissue disorders, insulin dependent diabetes, bleeding disorders, previous major abdominal surgery and chorioamnionitis are excluded. Outcomes include surgical site infection, intraoperative parameters such as tissue damage, postoperative analgesia requirements and patient satisfaction scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2016
CompletedFebruary 19, 2016
February 1, 2016
2.3 years
February 8, 2016
February 14, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of surgical site infection in low risk women having a first time planned Caesarean Section using the Alexis O Retractor compared to the traditional Metal Retractor.
6-8 Weeks after Surgery
Secondary Outcomes (24)
Application Satisfaction Scale Scores
Immediate Postoperative
Removal Satisfaction Scale Scores
On the day of Surgery (Day 0)
Post Operative Pain Scale Scores at Discharge
On the day of discharge (3-5 days)
Post Operative Pain at 6 Weeks
6 weeks post operative
Patients with Wound Dehisence at Discharge
On the day of discharge (3-5 days)
- +19 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Alexis O Retractor
EXPERIMENTALGroup 1 received the Alexis-O-Retractor at thet time of first Caesarean Section
Metal Retractor
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 2 received the traditional self retaining metal Retractor at thet time of first Caesarean Section
Interventions
A newly developed abdominal wall retractor for Caesarean Section is the Alexis O Ring which is formed of 2 rings and a interconnecting plastic polyurethane sheath where the flexible inner ring is placed into the abdomen and where the rigid outer ring is rolled to create tension on the plastic sheath providing 360° abdominal wound retraction with simultaneously a tamponade effect whilst covering the abdominal wound during the Caesarean Section and delivery of the baby.
The traditional self-retaining metal Collins Caesarean Wound Retractor.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women
- Elective Caesarean Section
- First Caesarean Section
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetes
- Chronic auto immune diseases
- Lupus
- Immune deficiency diseases
- HIV
- known bleeding disorders
- full anti-coagulation therapy
- wound healing problems
- previous Caesarean Section
- major abdominal surgery
- laparotomy
- active phase of labor
- suspected chorioamnionitis
- confirmed chorioamnionitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Klingel ML, Patel SV. A meta-analysis of the effect of inspired oxygen concentration on the incidence of surgical site infection following cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Apr;22(2):104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
PMID: 23490472BACKGROUNDHoriuchi T, Tanishima H, Tamagawa K, Sakaguchi S, Shono Y, Tsubakihara H, Tabuse K, Kinoshita Y. A wound protector shields incision sites from bacterial invasion. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010 Dec;11(6):501-3. doi: 10.1089/sur.2009.072. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
PMID: 20849290BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Larry Hinkson, MBBS,MRCOG
Charité University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant in Obstetrics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2016
First Posted
February 19, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share