NCT02668419

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether neuromuscular electrical stimulation can improve exercise tolerance for patients with heart failure and continuous dobutamine use in a hospital.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 19, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 29, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 29, 2016

Status Verified

January 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

January 19, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 28, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional capacity evaluated using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT)

    Functional capacity was evaluated using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), by a single evaluator blinded to the group allotment, in accordance with American Thoracic Society criteria.

    Change from assessment at admission and at patient discharge

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in the intravenous inotropic support dosage

    Change from the first day of the protocol and patient discharge

Study Arms (2)

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this group were subject to regular Physical Therapy Sessions in the hospital and each session consisted of breathing exercises and global active exercises of the upper and lower limbs in bed. The treatment was applied twice a day during the hospitalization period. The protocol was interrupted if the patient had signs or symptoms suggestive of poor tolerance to exercise.

Other: Physical Therapy Session

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulator

EXPERIMENTAL

Lower limb muscles of both legs were simultaneously stimulated using self adhesive surface rectangular electrodes. During all session period, the patients were maintained in the supine Fowler 45º position. The stimulation intensity was progressively increased according to the patient tolerance until a muscular contraction was observed. Stimulation was performed twice a day; the session duration was 60 min. Heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate and pulse oximetry were monitored throughout the sessions, in all patients.

Device: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulator

Interventions

Quadriceps and calf muscles of both legs were simultaneously stimulated using self adhesive surface rectangular electrodes. During all session period, the patients were maintained in the supine Fowler 45º position. Stimulation parameters were set up as follows: biphasic current of 40 Hz, 400-µs pulse duration, mode "on-time" 10s and "off-time" 20s and maximal amplitude of 60 mA. The stimulation intensity was progressively increased according to the patient tolerance until a muscular contraction was observed. Stimulation was performed twice a day; the session duration was 60 min.

Also known as: NMES, Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulator

each session consisted of breathing exercises and global active exercises of the upper and lower limbs in bed. The treatment was applied twice a day during the hospitalization period. The protocol was interrupted if the patient had signs or symptoms suggestive of poor tolerance to exercise: 1) cyanosis, pallor, dizziness, nausea or pre-syncope; 2) chest pain; 3) bradycardia; 4) a drop in systolic blood pressure \>15 mmHg in comparison to baseline; 5) an excessive rise in systolic blood pressure defined as \>200 mmHg; 6) a rise in diastolic blood pressure during exercise \>110 mmHg; 7) fatigue rated ≥6/10 on the perceived exertion Borg scale (PEB); and/or 8) electrocardiographic signs of cardiac ischemia or ventricular arrhythmias.

Usual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Advanced heart failure (Stage D - Left ventricle ejection fraction \<30%)
  • New York Heart Association class III-IV
  • Standard medical therapy for heart failure management
  • Continuous inotropic infusion

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable angina pectoris
  • Recent (6 months) acute coronary syndrome
  • Arrythmias
  • Chronic renal failure
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Peripheral vascular diseases
  • Inability to walk

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Federal University of Sao Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, 04024-002, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Dysfunction

Study Officials

  • Patricia Forestieri, PT

    Federal University of São Paulo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PT

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2016

First Posted

January 29, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

January 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No subject data will be made public. However, all participants were given the principal investigator's e-mail address and phone number in order to ask questions or receive their assessment results.

Locations