Investigation of the Simplify® Cervical Artificial Disc
Clinical Study Protocol for the Investigation Of The Simplify® Cervical Artificial Disc
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
16
Brief Summary
This study is intended to demonstrate that the Simplify® Disc is at least as safe and effective as conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) when used to treat one level between C3 to C7 for cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) defined as intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain or myelopathy due to a single-level abnormality localized to the level of the disc space in subjects who are unresponsive to conservative management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 29, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 6, 2022
CompletedJanuary 8, 2026
December 1, 2025
4.4 years
October 8, 2015
April 4, 2022
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Composite Clinical Success (CCS) of Simplify Disc
Individual success for the Simplify® Disc subjects is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) Score at 24 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 24 months compared with baseline, no device failures or revision, reoperation, removal and/or supplemental fixation within 24 months of index procedure; and the absence of major adverse events within 24 months. Individual success for the control ADCF device subjects is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in NDI Score at 24 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 24 months compared with baseline, no device failures or revision, reoperation, removal and/or supplemental fixation within 24 months; and the absence of major adverse events within 24 months. NDI scale is reported in a range from 0 - 100, with 0 consistent with best ability to function and 100 with worst ability to function.
Baseline, 24 Months
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Number of Subjects With 15-point Improvement in NDI at 3 Months (Time to Recovery)
Baseline, 3 Months
VAS Neck and Arm Pain
Baseline, 24 Months
Neurological Status
Baseline, 24 Months
SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS) Maintenance or Improvement
Baseline, 24 Months
SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS) Maintenance or Improvement
Baseline, 24 Months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
OTHERSimplify Disc
EXPERIMENTALSimplify Disc
Interventions
This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be between 18 and 60 years of age;
- Have symptoms of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one cervical level from C3 to C7 defined as intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and /or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain or myelopathy due to a single-level abnormality localized to the level of the disc space and radiographic evidence of at least one of the following;
- Spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes or dark disc) on CT or MRI or;
- Disc height decreased by ≥ 1 mm when compared to adjacent levels on radiographic film, CT, or MRI or
- Disc herniation on CT or MRI;
- Have at least one of the following radiculopathy or myelopathy symptoms in neck and/or arm;
- Pain or paresthesias in a specific nerve root distribution from C3 to C7,
- Decreased muscle strength of at least one level on the 0-5 scale, or
- Abnormal sensation, including hyperesthesia or hypoesthesia.
- Have at least one of the following:
- At least six weeks of prior conservative treatment (e.g., physical therapy and/or use of anti-inflammatory medications and muscle relaxants at the manufacturer's recommended therapeutic dose);
- The presence of progressive symptoms (e.g., increasing numbness or tingling) or
- Signs of nerve root compression.
- Have a Neck Disability Index (NDI) greater than or equal to 40 on a scale of 100 (moderate disability);
- Be appropriate for treatment using an anterior surgical approach;
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Marked cervical instability on resting lateral or flexion/ extension X-ray (translation \> 3 mm or \> 11 degrees rotation to that of either adjacent non-treatment level);
- Non discogenic neck pain or non discogenic source of symptoms (e.g., tumor, rotator cuff injury, etc.);
- Radiographic confirmation of severe facet disease or facet degeneration;
- Bridging osteophytes;
- Less than 2 degrees of motion at index level;
- Prior surgery at the level to be treated, except laminotomy without accompanying facetectomy;
- Prior fusion at any cervical level;
- More than one neck surgery via anterior approach;
- Previous trauma to the C3-C7 levels resulting in compression or bursting;
- Documented presence of a free nuclear fragment at cervical levels other than the study level;
- Axial neck pain only (no radicular or myelopathy symptoms);
- Symptomatic DDD at more than one cervical level;
- Severe myelopathy (less than 3/5 muscle strength);
- Any paralysis;
- Recent history (within previous six months) of chemical or alcohol dependence;
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NuVasivelead
Study Sites (16)
Unknown Facility
La Jolla, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Monica, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Thornton, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Evanston, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Carmel, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Egg Harbor, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Lockport, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Addison, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Plano, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Tyler, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Reston, Virginia, United States
Limitations and Caveats
ACDF data is presented as a historical control fusion group from the Kineflex®\|C Disc trial
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Nicole Czaplewski
- Organization
- NuVasive, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kyle Malone
NuVasive
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2015
First Posted
January 28, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 23, 2020
Study Completion
July 29, 2021
Last Updated
January 8, 2026
Results First Posted
June 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share