Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
CERVIDISC
Comparison of 2 Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
1 other identifier
interventional
79
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Background : Cervical degenerative disc disease is frequent and the consequence of aging. Degeneration may lead to disc herniation. Surgery is indicated in the presence of root compression with cervicobrachial neuralgia and/or myelopathy. Purpose: The main objective of the study is the comparison of efficacy between total disc replacement (TDR) and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (ACDF) as surgical treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease in term of "Success" rate, defined as preservation of adjacent segments, 24 months after surgery. In our knowledge, there are no published data about randomized clinical trials comparing these radiological parameters (worsening of degeneration signs on static cervical spine radiographs and worsening of disc degeneration signs on MRI) at levels adjacent to surgery, between these 2 surgical approaches in patients suffering from cervical degenerative disc disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 4, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 24, 2021
CompletedJanuary 3, 2022
December 1, 2021
6.1 years
January 28, 2015
December 10, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare efficacy of TDR and ACDF as surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease in term of "success rate" defined as absence of radiological degenerative disease at adjacent levels
24 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Between-group comparison of tolerance
24 months after surgery
Between-group comparison of efficacy
45 days, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Total disc replacement (TDR)
EXPERIMENTALTotal disc replacement with preserved segmental motion decreasing load on adjacent levels.
Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (ACDF)
EXPERIMENTALInterbody fusion by replacing disc space with a cage packed with bone substitute, and inserted into the anterior portion of the interspace.
Interventions
Axelle®
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-60 years
- suffering from cervical disc degenerative disease (whatever the grade, level and intervertebral disc height) needing one-level surgical treatment due to either invalidating cervicobrachial nevralgia despite 3-month optimal medical treatment or neurological symptoms, with motion of surgical level at least equal to 2° degrees, and non-degenerative adjacent discs.
- Being affiliated to health insurance
You may not qualify if:
- Previous cervical traumatism and/or cervical surgery.
- Cervical degeneration defined as a Grade 4 according to modified Mehren classification and/or a Grade 5 according to Miyazaki et al classification on T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), at symptomatic level and/or its adjacent levels.
- Myelopathy.
- Cervical spine instability.
- Presence of at least one major contraindication to surgery and/or general anaesthesia (ie, non-controlled coagulopathy, active infection, or serious underlying disease, auto-immune affection).
- Presence of at least one contraindication to either TDR or ACDF procedure.
- Presence of at least one contraindication to either static/dynamic radiographs or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
- Severe radiological osteoporosis.
- Bone metabolic disease.
- Chronic intake of corticosteroids or any other treatment susceptible to interfere with study conduct and/or assessment (ie, immunosuppressive drugs).
- Unlikely to comply with the requirements of the study and/or to complete the study for psychological, social, familial or geographical reasons.
- No contraception for women of childbearing age
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Being under guardianship or legal supervision.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Chirurgie Orthopedique
Bordeaux, 33076, France
CHU Nice - Unité de Chirurgie Rachidienne
Nice, 06000, France
Chirurgie Orthopedique
Paris, 75013, France
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Antoine BENARD, MD
University Hospital Bordeaux, France
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivier GILLE, Prof
University Hospital Bordeaux, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2015
First Posted
April 15, 2015
Study Start
November 4, 2015
Primary Completion
November 24, 2021
Study Completion
November 24, 2021
Last Updated
January 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12