NCT02665975

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention with face to face standard clinical care for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
92

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 22, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 28, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2016

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 14, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

January 22, 2016

Results QC Date

January 16, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 24, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Tinnitus treatmentInternet-interventionCBT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Tinnitus Functional Index

    A self-reported outcome measure of tinnitus severity. Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score out of 100 is reported and not any subscales Scores below 25 indicate mild tinnitus, from 25-50 indicated significant tinnitus and from 50-100 severe tinnitus

    At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Tinnitus Handicap Inventory

    Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both time points are reported

  • Satisfaction With Life Scale

    Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported

  • Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

    Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

  • Patient Health Questionnaire

    At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention

  • Generalised Anxiety Disorder

    At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental group: iCBT

EXPERIMENTAL

CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus The intervention offered is a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.

Behavioral: CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus

Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Receive individual face-to-face tinnitus care, and follow-up appointments as required.

Behavioral: Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care

Interventions

Tinnitus e-learning programme

Also known as: iCBT
Experimental group: iCBT

Hospital tinnitus counselling

Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Attending either Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Milton Keynes University Hospital or Hinchingbrooke Hospitals as recruitment is via these hospitals
  • The ability to read and type in English
  • No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems)
  • Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these
  • Commitment to completing the programme
  • Completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires
  • Agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups
  • Understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same

You may not qualify if:

  • Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions
  • Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically
  • Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation
  • Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY, United Kingdom

Location

Hinchingbrooke Hospital

Huntingdon, PE29 6NT, United Kingdom

Location

Milton Keynes University Hospital

Milton Keynes, MK6 5LD, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Rodrigo H, Beukes EW, Andersson G, Manchaiah V. Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for tinnitus: secondary analysis to examine predictors of outcomes. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 20;11(8):e049384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049384.

  • Beukes EW, Andersson G, Allen PM, Manchaiah V, Baguley DM. Effectiveness of Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Face-to-Face Clinical Care for Treatment of Tinnitus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Dec 1;144(12):1126-1133. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2238.

  • Beukes EW, Baguley DM, Allen PM, Manchaiah V, Andersson G. Guided Internet-based versus face-to-face clinical care in the management of tinnitus: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 21;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1931-6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

This trial had many challenges, such as difficulty recruiting a sufficient number of participants. The low ratio of people participating in the study in comparison with those who were invited was a potential source of bias. In addition, the nonuniform nature of the clinical care received from the various study centers may have contributed to the variability. Interpretation of the data are limited to participants with similar demographic and clinical profiles.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Eldre Beukes
Organization
Anglia Ruskin Univeristy

Study Officials

  • Allen Peter

    Anglia Ruskin University

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2016

First Posted

January 28, 2016

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion

August 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 14, 2021

Results First Posted

July 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations