Assessing Covert Consciousness in Unresponsive Patients
Assessing the Potential for 'Covert Consciousness' in Unresponsive Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators explore anesthesia as a tool for providing further insight into the level of consciousness of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), but who possess some neurophysiological signatures of conscious awareness. This group, who could potentially be conscious, will herein be referred to as the target population. Our goal is to assess whether or not neurological patterns of consciousness in the target population respond to anesthesia in a similar manner to neurologically compromised individuals with known consciousness (e.g. those in minimally conscious state (MCS). In healthy controls, propofol-induced unconsciousness results in an elimination of the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential (ERP) and a diminished directed connectivity. The investigators hypothesize that at doses well below those required for surgery, anesthesia will have similar effects on these neural patterns in neurologically compromised patients with the potential for conscious awareness, but will not affect these patterns in those who lack consciousness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 27, 2016
October 1, 2016
6 months
January 8, 2016
October 25, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Asymmetry in feedback vs. feedforward network connectivity
EEG networks will be monitored pre, during and post anesthesia. Directed connectivity will be calculated using phase lag index (PLI) and symbolic transfer entropy (STE) between all combinations of EEG sensors. Average values of feedback connectivity (e.g. from the frontal regions to parietal and occipital regions) will be compared to average values of feedforward connectivity (e.g. from parietal and occipital regions to frontal regions). Positive asymmetry will be correlated to the presence of conscious awareness and negative asymmetry will be correlated to the absence of conscious awareness.
3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Presence of P300 and N400 event-related potentials
3 hours
Study Arms (3)
Control 1 (negative control)
PLACEBO COMPARATORIndividuals with a diagnosis of UWS without neural markers of consciousness
Control 2 (positive control)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals with a diagnosis of MCS, who are behaviourally responsive and who present neural markers of consciousness
Target Population
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals with a clinical diagnosis of UWS, but who possess some neurophysiological signatures of conscious awareness
Interventions
EEG recording with anesthetic (DIPRIVAN)
The participant will receive an intravenous infusion of propofol (DIPRIVAN Injectable Emulsion USP 1%, AstraZeneca).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients admitted to the intensive care unit at Hamilton General Hospital who:
- Clinical status consistent with UWS (no responsiveness to commands)
- Clinical status consistent with MCS (minimal response to at least one command)
- Presence of an endotracheal tube (ETT) or a tracheostomy tube
- Between 18 and 50 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP)
- Hepatic or renal failure
- Hemodynamic instability
- Active vasopressor therapy
- Previous open-head injury
- Previous intracranial pathology requiring neurosurgical interventions in the past 72 hours
- Anticipated ICU stay \< 24 hours
- Documented allergy to propofol
- Pregnancy
- BMI \> 35 kg/m2
- Anyone who is deemed medically unsuitable for this study by the attending intensivist
- Patients who are already in a medically-induced coma for intracranial hypertension or status epilepticus
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Michiganlead
- McGill Universitycollaborator
- McMaster Universitycollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Bert N La De Professor of Anesthesiology Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2016
First Posted
January 20, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 27, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10