Strong Ion Gap as Prognostic Indicator for Adult Patients Admitted With Shock to the Intensive Care Units
1 other identifier
observational
112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates if strong ion gap on admission or 24 hours after admission to critical care unit can predict 28 day outcome in patients admitted with shock due to any cause
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedMarch 19, 2020
March 1, 2020
2 years
January 7, 2016
March 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
mortality
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Duration of ICU stay
28 days
Eligibility Criteria
Patient with any form of shock on admission to ICU defined by those who require vasopressors or inotropes to maintain MAP \> 65mmHg on admission
You may qualify if:
- Patient with any form of shock on admission to ICU
You may not qualify if:
- CKD stage 3 and above (GFR\> 60)
- Chronic liver failure( Child's B grade and above)
- Patients who were already recruited for this study
- Patients expected to die within next 48 hrs upon admission
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Singapore General Hospitallead
- Changi General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608, Singapore
Related Publications (17)
Mecher C, Rackow EC, Astiz ME, Weil MH. Unaccounted for anion in metabolic acidosis during severe sepsis in humans. Crit Care Med. 1991 May;19(5):705-11. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199105000-00018.
PMID: 2026034RESULTFigge J, Mydosh T, Fencl V. Serum proteins and acid-base equilibria: a follow-up. J Lab Clin Med. 1992 Nov;120(5):713-9.
PMID: 1431499RESULTFigge J, Jabor A, Kazda A, Fencl V. Anion gap and hypoalbuminemia. Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1807-10. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00019.
PMID: 9824071RESULTStewart PA. Modern quantitative acid-base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1983 Dec;61(12):1444-61. doi: 10.1139/y83-207.
PMID: 6423247RESULTKellum JA, Kramer DJ, Pinsky MR. Strong ion gap: a methodology for exploring unexplained anions. J Crit Care. 1995 Jun;10(2):51-5. doi: 10.1016/0883-9441(95)90016-0.
PMID: 7647842RESULTGunnerson KJ. Clinical review: the meaning of acid-base abnormalities in the intensive care unit part I - epidemiology. Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):508-16. doi: 10.1186/cc3796. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
PMID: 16277740RESULTKellum JA. Closing the gap on unmeasured anions. Crit Care. 2003 Jun;7(3):219-20. doi: 10.1186/cc2189. Epub 2003 May 8.
PMID: 12793870RESULTRutherford EJ, Morris JA Jr, Reed GW, Hall KS. Base deficit stratifies mortality and determines therapy. J Trauma. 1992 Sep;33(3):417-23. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199209000-00014.
PMID: 1404512RESULTSmith I, Kumar P, Molloy S, Rhodes A, Newman PJ, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. Base excess and lactate as prognostic indicators for patients admitted to intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jan;27(1):74-83. doi: 10.1007/s001340051352.
PMID: 11280677RESULTBalasubramanyan N, Havens PL, Hoffman GM. Unmeasured anions identified by the Fencl-Stewart method predict mortality better than base excess, anion gap, and lactate in patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1577-81. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00030.
PMID: 10470767RESULTKaplan LJ, Kellum JA. Initial pH, base deficit, lactate, anion gap, strong ion difference, and strong ion gap predict outcome from major vascular injury. Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1120-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000125517.28517.74.
PMID: 15190960RESULTFunk GC, Doberer D, Sterz F, Richling N, Kneidinger N, Lindner G, Schneeweiss B, Eisenburger P. The strong ion gap and outcome after cardiac arrest in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia: a retrospective study. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Feb;35(2):232-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1315-1. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
PMID: 18853143RESULTNoritomi DT, Soriano FG, Kellum JA, Cappi SB, Biselli PJ, Liborio AB, Park M. Metabolic acidosis in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a longitudinal quantitative study. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2733-9. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181a59165.
PMID: 19885998RESULTCusack RJ, Rhodes A, Lochhead P, Jordan B, Perry S, Ball JA, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. The strong ion gap does not have prognostic value in critically ill patients in a mixed medical/surgical adult ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jul;28(7):864-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1318-2. Epub 2002 Jun 14.
PMID: 12122523RESULTRocktaeschel J, Morimatsu H, Uchino S, Bellomo R. Unmeasured anions in critically ill patients: can they predict mortality? Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2131-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000079819.27515.8E.
PMID: 12973170RESULTHayhoe M, Bellomo R, Liu G, McNicol L, Buxton B. The aetiology and pathogenesis of cardiopulmonary bypass-associated metabolic acidosis using polygeline pump prime. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):680-5. doi: 10.1007/s001340050930.
PMID: 10470571RESULTGunnerson KJ, Srisawat N, Kellum JA. Is there a difference between strong ion gap in healthy volunteers and intensive care unit patients? J Crit Care. 2010 Sep;25(3):520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
PMID: 19942401RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2016
First Posted
January 11, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03