Aprepitant vs. Desloratadine in EGFR-TKIs Related Pruritus Treatment
EGFR-TKIs
1 other identifier
interventional
138
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study hypothesis is that aprepitant is more effective than desloratadine in relieving pruritus caused by EGFR TKIs. Primary endpoint is the effective rate of pruritus, effective treatment defined as visual analogue scale (VAS) decrease ≥ 50% after treatment compared to baseline score. 130 NSCLC patients undertaken EGFR-TKI and suffer from moderate or severe pruritus (VAS score ≥ 4) will be enrolled in this study, and stratified (gender, VAS 4-6 or 7-10, and 2nd generation TKI or non 2nd generation) randomized (1:1) into aprepitant or desloratadine treatment. VAS investigation will be taken once a week to treatment end (4 weeks).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer
Started Dec 2015
Typical duration for phase_2 nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedMay 18, 2021
May 1, 2021
4.8 years
December 10, 2015
May 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
effective rate of pruritus relieving
effective treatment of pruritus relieving defined as visual analogue scale (VAS) decrease ≥ 50% after treatment compared to baseline score
day 28 at the treatment ends
Secondary Outcomes (2)
duration of pruritus relieving
12 weeks at the follow-up end
Change from baseline quality of life assessment at treatment ends
baseline, 28 days at the treatment ends
Study Arms (2)
Aprepitant and placebo
EXPERIMENTALaprepitant 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5, along with placebo 5mg d1-d28;
desloratadine and placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATORplacebo 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5, along with desloratadine 5mg d1-d28
Interventions
aprepitant 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5; until pruritus recurrence or discontinuation of EGFR-TKI or safely issues (SAE etc.)
Desloratadine 5mg d1-d28; until pruritus recurrence or discontinuation of EGFR-TKI or safely issues (SAE etc.)
Placebo of aprepitant 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5; until pruritus recurrence or discontinuation of EGFR-TKI or safely issues (SAE etc.)
Placebo of desloratadine 5mg d1-d28; until pruritus recurrence or discontinuation of EGFR-TKI or safely issues (SAE etc.)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer
- Undertaken EGFR TKIs treatment (gefitinib, erlotinib, icotinib, afatinib, etc)
- years old
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2
- Moderate or severe pruritus (VAS score ≥ 4) first occur after EGFR TKIs treatment
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
- Orally drug administration with no difficulty
- pregnancy test negative in 7 days for women of child-bearing age; willing to take contraception measures.
- Signed informed consent form (ICF)
You may not qualify if:
- Systemically treatment with Neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor inhibitors, antihistamines drugs, antibiotics, cortical hormone therapy, antiepileptic drugs, immunosuppressive agents or other drugs might affect treatment in 4 weeks; or locally used of these drug in 2 weeks.
- Existing skin lesions not EGFR TKIs related, such as skin infection, chronic dermatitis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), lymphoma or other diseases.
- Total bilirubin ≥ 1.5 Upper Limit Of Normal (ULN)
- Serum creatinine ≥mg/dl
- AST or ALT ≥ 2.5 ULN without liver metastasis; or ≥ 5 ULN with liver metastasis.
- Residual toxicity event ≥ CTC-AE grade 2, except peripheral neurotoxicities.
- Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis or spinal compression; except no symptoms and with no cortical hormonotherapy in 4 weeks.
- Clinical evidence of interstitial lung disease
- Any severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases judged by investigators.
- Any contraindication of Neurokinin-1 receptor inhibitors and desloratadine.
- Discontinuation Criteria
- Invalid subject after randomization
- Major protocol violations judged by investigators.
- Poor compliance
- Intolerable adverse events
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cancer Center of Sun-Yat Sen University (CCSYSU)
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Related Publications (24)
Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, Sunpaweravong P, Han B, Margono B, Ichinose Y, Nishiwaki Y, Ohe Y, Yang JJ, Chewaskulyong B, Jiang H, Duffield EL, Watkins CL, Armour AA, Fukuoka M. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):947-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
PMID: 19692680RESULTZhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, Zhang L, You C. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Aug;12(8):735-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-X. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
PMID: 21783417RESULTShepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabarbara P, Seymour L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050753.
PMID: 16014882RESULTCappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, Cicenas S, Szczesna A, Juhasz E, Esteban E, Molinier O, Brugger W, Melezinek I, Klingelschmitt G, Klughammer B, Giaccone G; SATURN investigators. Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jun;11(6):521-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70112-1. Epub 2010 May 20.
PMID: 20493771RESULTZhang L, Ma S, Song X, Han B, Cheng Y, Huang C, Yang S, Liu X, Liu Y, Lu S, Wang J, Zhang S, Zhou C, Zhang X, Hayashi N, Wang M; INFORM investigators. Gefitinib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (INFORM; C-TONG 0804): a multicentre, double-blind randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):466-75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70117-1. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
PMID: 22512843RESULTLynch TJ Jr, Kim ES, Eaby B, Garey J, West DP, Lacouture ME. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-associated cutaneous toxicities: an evolving paradigm in clinical management. Oncologist. 2007 May;12(5):610-21. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-5-610.
PMID: 17522250RESULTLacouture ME, Anadkat MJ, Bensadoun RJ, Bryce J, Chan A, Epstein JB, Eaby-Sandy B, Murphy BA; MASCC Skin Toxicity Study Group. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of EGFR inhibitor-associated dermatologic toxicities. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1079-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1197-6. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
PMID: 21630130RESULTChan A, Tan EH. How well does the MESTT correlate with CTCAE scale for the grading of dermatological toxicities associated with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors? Support Care Cancer. 2011 Oct;19(10):1667-74. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0999-2. Epub 2010 Sep 5.
PMID: 20820812RESULTOcvirk J, Cencelj S. Management of cutaneous side-effects of cetuximab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Apr;24(4):453-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03446.x. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
PMID: 19793151RESULTScope A, Agero AL, Dusza SW, Myskowski PL, Lieb JA, Saltz L, Kemeny NE, Halpern AC. Randomized double-blind trial of prophylactic oral minocycline and topical tazarotene for cetuximab-associated acne-like eruption. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 1;25(34):5390-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6987.
PMID: 18048820RESULTPorzio G, Aielli F, Verna L, Porto C, Tudini M, Cannita K, Ficorella C. Efficacy of pregabalin in the management of cetuximab-related itch. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Nov;32(5):397-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.07.006. No abstract available.
PMID: 17085262RESULTStander S, Siepmann D, Herrgott I, Sunderkotter C, Luger TA. Targeting the neurokinin receptor 1 with aprepitant: a novel antipruritic strategy. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 4;5(6):e10968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010968.
PMID: 20532044RESULTStander S, Weisshaar E. Medical treatment of pruritus. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2012 Sep;17(3):335-45. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2012.711316. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
PMID: 22870909RESULTChang SE, Han SS, Jung HJ, Choi JH. Neuropeptides and their receptors in psoriatic skin in relation to pruritus. Br J Dermatol. 2007 Jun;156(6):1272-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07935.x.
PMID: 17535226RESULTQuartara L, Altamura M. Tachykinin receptors antagonists: from research to clinic. Curr Drug Targets. 2006 Aug;7(8):975-92. doi: 10.2174/138945006778019381.
PMID: 16918326RESULTBooken N, Heck M, Nicolay JP, Klemke CD, Goerdt S, Utikal J. Oral aprepitant in the therapy of refractory pruritus in erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Mar;164(3):665-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10108.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 21039410RESULTVincenzi B, Fratto ME, Santini D, Tonini G. Aprepitant against pruritus in patients with solid tumours. Support Care Cancer. 2010 Sep;18(9):1229-30. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0895-9. Epub 2010 Jun 11. No abstract available.
PMID: 20544226RESULTJimenez Gallo D, Albarran Planelles C, Linares Barrios M, Fernandez Anguita MJ, Marquez Enriquez J, Rodriguez Mateos ME. Treatment of pruritus in early-stage hypopigmented mycosis fungoides with aprepitant. Dermatol Ther. 2014 May-Jun;27(3):178-82. doi: 10.1111/dth.12113. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
PMID: 24517320RESULTSantini D, Vincenzi B, Guida FM, Imperatori M, Schiavon G, Venditti O, Frezza AM, Berti P, Tonini G. Aprepitant for management of severe pruritus related to biological cancer treatments: a pilot study. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Oct;13(10):1020-4. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70373-X. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
PMID: 22995650RESULTMarquez D, Ramonda C, Lauxmann JE, Romero CA, Vukelic VL, Martinatto C, Barron B, Novoa PA, Peixoto AJ, Orias M. Uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients: treatment with desloratidine versus gabapentin. J Bras Nefrol. 2012 Jun;34(2):148-52. doi: 10.1590/s0101-28002012000200007.
PMID: 22850916RESULTBachert C, Maurer M. Safety and efficacy of desloratadine in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis or chronic urticaria: results of four postmarketing surveillance studies. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(2):109-22. doi: 10.2165/11530930-000000000-00000.
PMID: 20067329RESULTGrob JJ, Auquier P, Dreyfus I, Ortonne JP. Quality of life in adults with chronic idiopathic urticaria receiving desloratadine: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Jan;22(1):87-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02385.x.
PMID: 18181978RESULTOrtonne JP, Grob JJ, Auquier P, Dreyfus I. Efficacy and safety of desloratadine in adults with chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2007;8(1):37-42. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200708010-00005.
PMID: 17298105RESULTZhou T, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Ma W, Wu X, Huang L, Feng W, Zhou H, Liu J, Zhao H, Zhang L, Yang Y, Huang Y. Comparison of aprepitant versus desloratadine for EGFR-TKI-induced pruritus: A randomized phase 2 clinical trial. Cancer. 2022 Nov 15;128(22):3969-3976. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34474. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
PMID: 36197287DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Li Zhang, professor
Sun Yat-sen University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D. Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2015
First Posted
January 5, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share