NCT02642029

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the impact of modulating cerebellar activity on time perception, executive function, and mood and psychotic symptoms in psychosis patients (i.e., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder with psychotic features). The investigators hypothesize that abnormally reduced activity in the cerebellum contributes to the abnormalities in patients, that cerebellum-mediated disruptions in time perception may partially underlie executive dysfunction and symptoms, and that cerebellar stimulation will normalize disease-relevant outcome measures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
28

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable schizophrenia

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable schizophrenia

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 30, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 18, 2016

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 14, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 14, 2019

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 30, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

November 20, 2015

Results QC Date

August 25, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

time perceptionexecutive functionpsychosismood symptoms

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

  • Change (Δ) in Accuracy of Time Interval Discrimination Pre- and Post-TMS

    In each trial, participants are presented with two tones separated by 1200 ms (the standard interval), a 1s delay, then a comparison pair of tones. The time interval of the second tone pair will be either equal to (E-condition), longer than (L-condition), or shorter than (S-condition) that of the first pair. Participants are asked to indicate using a keyboard whether the second time interval is equal, longer, or shorter than the first. The tones for all conditions were 700Hz in frequency, 50ms in duration, and presented binaurally via headphones. Participants completed 15 trials during each pre- or post-TMS session for a total of up to 90 total trials across the three study visits. Prior to each IDT session, participants performed a practice run consisting of six trials. The primary outcome for this task was overall accuracy (proportion of correct responses).

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Accuracy of N-back Working Memory Task Pre- and Post-TMS

    Participants are presented with a series of words or numbers and prompted to indicate as quickly as possible whether the currently presented stimulus is the same as the one presented n-stimuli previously. For example, in a 2-back task a subject would be asked to indicate whether the current stimulus was identical to that presented 2 stimuli before. To increase the likelihood of detecting change in task performance with each TMS condition (and minimize potential ceiling or floor effects), the difficulty level was individualized so that each participant performed at approximately 80% accuracy; during the "pre" session of the first study visit, a trial session established the difficulty level, i.e., how many presentations back (n-stimuli) at which the task would start. After the trial session, a session with 50 presentations was carried out and recorded whether the response was correct (accuracy) and the time from presentation to response (reaction time).

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Reaction Time (RT) of N-back Working Memory Task Pre- and Post-TMS

    Participants are presented with a series of words or numbers and prompted to indicate as quickly as possible whether the currently presented stimulus is the same as the one presented n-stimuli previously. For example, in a 2-back task a subject would be asked to indicate whether the current stimulus was identical to that presented 2 stimuli before. To increase the likelihood of detecting change in task performance with each TMS condition (and minimize potential ceiling or floor effects), the difficulty level was individualized so that each participant performed at approximately 80% accuracy; during the "pre" session of the first study visit, a trial session established the difficulty level, i.e., how many presentations back (n-stimuli) at which the task would start. After the trial session, a session with 50 presentations was carried out and recorded whether the response was correct (accuracy) and the time from presentation to response (reaction time).

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Depressed Mood)

    Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Anxiety)

    Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Elated Mood)

    Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent/no elation, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. Higher VAS scores for elation indicate more elation (suggestive of mania). The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Auditory Hallucinations)

    Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Visual Hallucinations)

    Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Paranoid Ideation)

    Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Ideas/Delusions of Reference)

    Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

  • Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Delusions of Control)

    Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.

    In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.

Study Arms (3)

Intermittent TBS (iTBS)

EXPERIMENTAL

Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.

Device: Excitatory TMS

Continuous TBS (cTBS)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.

Device: Inhibitory TMS

Sham TBS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.

Device: Sham TMS

Interventions

Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.

Also known as: iTBS
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)

Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.

Also known as: cTBS
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
Sham TMSDEVICE

Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.

Also known as: shamTBS
Sham TBS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients
  • Men and women
  • Ages 18-50 years
  • Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective disorder (SZA), or psychotic bipolar disorder (BP).
  • On a stable psychiatric medication regimen for at least a month prior to and during study participation
  • Healthy Controls:
  • Men and women
  • Ages 18-50 years
  • Without major psychiatric illness

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients
  • Any change in psychiatric medications within a month prior to and during study participation
  • Legal or mental incompetency
  • Intellectual disability
  • Substance use disorder (abuse or dependence) with active use within the last 3 months
  • Significant medical or neurological illness
  • Prior neurosurgical procedure
  • History of seizures
  • History of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or clinical TMS within the past three months
  • History of participation in a cerebellar TMS study
  • Implanted cardiac pacemakers
  • Patients who have conductive, ferromagnetic or other magnetic-sensitive metals implanted in their head or neck, or are non-removable and within 30 cm of the treatment coil. These include:
  • Aneurysm clips or coils
  • Carotid or cerebral stents
  • Metallic devices implanted in the head (e.g. Implanted pacemaker, medication pump, vagal stimulator, deep brain stimulator, TENS unit, or ventriculo-peritoneal shunt)
  • +31 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

McLean Hospital

Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478, United States

Location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Shinn AK, Hurtado-Puerto AM, Roh YS, Ho V, Hwang M, Cohen BM, Ongur D, Camprodon JA. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychotic disorders: intermittent, continuous, and sham theta-burst stimulation on time perception and symptom severity. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 13;14:1218321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1218321. eCollection 2023.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SchizophreniaPsychotic Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental Disorders

Limitations and Caveats

(1) Small sample size. (2) Statistical analyses uncorrected for multiple comparisons. (3) Sample consisted mostly of stable outpatients with low symptom severity. (4) IDT task difficulty was not adjusted to participant performance. (5) Negative symptoms were not evaluated. However, acute changes in negative symptoms (which tend to be trait-like phenomena) are more challenging to measure. (6) Study did not include any biological markers (e.g., imaging) by which to measure TBS effects.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ann Shinn, MD
Organization
McLean Hospital

Study Officials

  • Ann K Shinn, MD, MPH

    Mclean Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2015

First Posted

December 30, 2015

Study Start

February 18, 2016

Primary Completion

June 14, 2019

Study Completion

June 14, 2019

Last Updated

December 30, 2022

Results First Posted

December 30, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Locations