Improving Neurocognitive Deficits and Function in Schizophrenia With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 other identifiers
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in remediating cognitive deficits while also improving functionality in Veterans with schizophrenia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable schizophrenia
Started Aug 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 18, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 17, 2020
CompletedAugust 15, 2024
August 1, 2024
2 years
January 27, 2017
June 4, 2020
August 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Working Memory Function
Changes in scores for working memory performance accuracy will serve as dependent measure for testing the hypothesis that rTMS improves working memory. Working memory performance was assessed using a non-standardized task developed in house, which is basically a Sterberg style delayed response task in which memoranda are displayed and are to be remembered across a short delay period. The hypothesis will be supported if the investigators find greater working memory difference in the active compared to the sham-rTMS-treated groups as revealed by t-tests and two-sided tests at an alpha level of 0.05. Scores will be reported as a change in percent accuracy during this working memory task, where higher percent accuracy is better and scores range from -100% to 100%.
before treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change in Neurophysiologic Function
Gamma oscillation is viewed as a measure of neurophysiologic function. The investigators will be conducting task-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) to measure gamma oscillation before and after rTMS. It is predicted that the intervention will improve gamma oscillations.
before treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change in Level of Everyday Functioning
Changes in Global Functioning Scale scores (GF) will serve as dependent measure for testing the hypothesis that rTMS improves functioning. The hypothesis will be supported if the investigators find greater GF-difference in the active compared to the sham-rTMS-treated groups as revealed by t-tests and two-sided tests at an alpha level of 0.05. Scale's values range from a minimum score of 1 to a maximum score of 10, with a higher score means better functioning.
before treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change in General Cognitive Ability
Changes in Brief Assessment of Cognition (BACS) score will serve as a dependent measure for testing the hypothesis that rTMS improves cognitive functioning. The hypothesis will be supported if the investigators find greater GF-difference in the active compared to the sham-rTMS-treated groups as revealed by t-tests and two-sided tests at an alpha level of 0.05. Data will be reported as change in Z-score on the scale, where a higher value means a better outcome, with scores ranging from -3 to 3.
before treatment and after 6-week treatment
Study Arms (2)
Active rTMS
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will receive actual rTMS treatment.
Sham rTMS
SHAM COMPARATORSubjects will attend and sit through the session, but no rTMS treatment will be actually delivered to them.
Interventions
rTMS is a non-invasive procedure, in which the administration of a transient magnetic field induces electrical currents in specific, targeted brain regions. The intervention will be administered in 20 sessions lasting 50 minutes each over the course of 2-6 weeks. Up to two sessions may be scheduled per day with a one-hour interval in-between.
Subjects will still attend treatment sessions as outlined in the rTMS intervention. However, the device will not deliver any stimulation to the subject.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders) confirmed diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder
- Stable medication regimen (no change in dose or agents within the 2 weeks prior to study entry and throughout the duration of the study)
- Stable social environment and housing to enable regular attendance at clinic visits
- Ability to undergo cognitive testing, EEG scans and rTMS
- IQ (intelligence quotient) \> 80 (WASI full scale score)
- In general good medical health
- Is in treatment with a psychiatrist and/or primary care physician within the VHA (Veteran's Health Administration) system
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating female
- History of prior adverse reaction to TMS
- On medications known to significantly lower seizure threshold, e.g.:
- clozapine
- chlorpromazine
- clomipramine
- History of seizures or conditions known to substantially increase risk for seizures
- Implants or medical devices incompatible with TMS
- Acute or unstable chronic illness that would affect participation or compliance with study procedures, e.g.:
- unstable angina
- Substance abuse/dependence (not including caffeine or nicotine) within one-month period prior to study entry or during study participation
- Unstable psychiatric symptoms that precludes consistent participation in the study, e.g.:
- active current suicidal intent or plan
- severe psychosis
- History of loss of consciousness greater than 15 minutes due to head injury.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- VA Office of Research and Developmentlead
- Stanford Universitycollaborator
- University of South Carolinacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, California, 94304-1207, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jong Yoon
- Organization
- Palo Alto VA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jong H. Yoon, MD
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2017
First Posted
January 31, 2017
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 18, 2019
Study Completion
July 18, 2019
Last Updated
August 15, 2024
Results First Posted
August 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share