Resilience for Older Workers With OA Through Exercise
Resilience and Longevity for Older Workers With Arthritis Through Exercise
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Exercise is effective at reducing pain while improving physical function. However we do not know if exercise can boost resilience in the workplace, to allow people with osteoarthritis to work as long as they desire. Previous research shows that exercise holds the most promise for helping people enjoy their work because it reduces sick time, reduces pain, and improves productivity. However, little work has examined the effect of exercise for people with arthritis in the workplace. The purpose of the study is to investigate whether exercise improves resilience in the workplace, mobility, fitness, strength, and pain in comparison to no exercise in those with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 10, 2017
CompletedMarch 22, 2018
September 1, 2017
11 months
November 17, 2015
September 27, 2016
March 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Lower Extremity Function
The Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) consists of 20 items, on an adjectival scale, that assess difficulty during mobility tasks ranging from transfers to running. Each item is scored from 0 (extreme difficulty or unable to perform activity), to 4 (no difficulty to perform activity). The minimum possible score is 0, and the maximum possible score is 80. Scores closer to 80 represent better self-reported physical function. It is reliable and valid in knee OA and has superior sensitivity to change compared to similar measures.
Week 1 and Week 13
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Change in Self-reported Knee and Hip Pain
Week 1 and Week 13
Change in Resilience
Week 1 and Week 13
Change in Mobility Performance (Six-Minute Walk Test)
Week 1 and Week 13
Change in Mobility Performance (40 Metre Walk Test)
Week 1 and Week 13
Change in Mobility Performance (Stair Ascent)
Week 1 and Week 13
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Exercise
EXPERIMENTALThe participants in this arm were asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Four class times were offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements were obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise
OTHERThe participants in this arm were asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group were offered a free exercise pass following completion of the study. Measurements were obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Interventions
A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading was administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
A no exercise (control) group maintained their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- McMaster employee
- Sedentary job (stand or walk for \<1/3 of work day)
- Able to safely climb two flights of stairs
- Hip pain
- Hip pain during internal rotation and hip flexion
- Knee pain
- Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness in the knee
- Crepitus in the knee with active range of motion
- Bony enlargement around the knee
- Bony tenderness to palpation at the knee
- No warmth around the knee
You may not qualify if:
- Any other forms of arthritis
- Osteoporosis-related fracture
- History of patellofemoral symptoms
- Active non-arthritic hip or knee disease
- Hip or knee surgery
- Use of cane or walking aid
- Unstable heart condition
- Neurological conditions
- Hip, knee or ankle injuries in past 3 months
- Physician-advised restriction to physical activity
- Any injuries that would prohibit participation in exercise
- Ipsilateral ankle conditions
- Currently receiving cancer treatment
- Currently pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 3Y4, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Chopp-Hurley JN, Brenneman EC, Wiebenga EG, Bulbrook B, Keir PJ, Maly MR. Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Role of Exercise in the Workplace to Improve Work Ability, Performance, and Patient-Reported Symptoms Among Older Workers With Osteoarthritis. J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jun;59(6):550-556. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001020.
PMID: 28379878DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
* Sample size in this trial was limited * Adherence to the exercise classes in the exercise group was poor
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Monica Maly
- Organization
- McMaster University/University of Waterloo
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monica R Maly, PT, PhD
McMaster University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2015
First Posted
November 20, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 22, 2018
Results First Posted
March 10, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share