Comparison of Angioplasty/Drug Coated Balloon/Laser + Drug Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis
INTACT
Economic Evaluation Comparing Standard Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-eluted Balloon or Laser-Excimer in Association With Drug-eluted Balloon in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis.
1 other identifier
interventional
222
1 country
15
Brief Summary
The aim of this multicenter triple-arm randomized study is to compare two innovative techniques with the gold standard currently used and providing unsatisfactory results for the In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) treatment in femoro-popliteal arteries. This protocol compares the use of drug-coated balloons (paclitaxel - antimitotic) used alone or in association with the Excimer Laser to recalibrate the vessel lumen into the stent by destroying the whole fibrous material to the standard angioplasty using plain balloons. INTACT study main objective is to assess cost-effectiveness ratio of the treatment of femoropopliteal artery in-stent restenosis by comparing these two innovative strategies and the standard one in terms of cost per Qaly (Quality adjusted life-years) gained at 18 months from a collective perspective.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Dec 2015
Typical duration for phase_3
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 5, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 19, 2019
November 1, 2019
4.4 years
November 5, 2015
November 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incremental cost per Qaly gained at 18 months
18 months after angioplasty
Incremental cost per avoided stenosis relapse at 18 months
18 months after angioplasty
Secondary Outcomes (9)
New In-stent restenosis during follow-up
1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
A major adverse event
1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Improvement in the walking procedure
Before and 12 months after angioplasty
Clinical improvement
6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
Systolic blood pressure Index
6 months, 12 months and 18 months after angioplasty
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Standard balloon
NO INTERVENTIONAngioplasty with use of standard balloons
Drug-coated balloons
EXPERIMENTALAngioplasty with use of drug-coated balloons
Drug-coated balloons and laser
EXPERIMENTALAngioplasty with use of drug-coated balloons in association with Excimer Laser
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient of age \> 18 years
- Patient with previously peripheral implanted stent(s) located in or extending to the popliteal artery
- Patient with one or more in-stent restenosis lesion(s) \> 70% in the same arterial segment in association with clinical symptoms of claudication or an critical limb ischemia with Rutherford classification of 2, 3, 4 or 5
- Reference vessel diameter between 4 and 7 mm
- Patient affiliated to a social security regimen
- EC-approved consent form signed by the participant and the investigator (must be signed prior initiation of any study related intervention)
You may not qualify if:
- Life expectancy \>18 months
- Patient already included in this study (recruitment of the contralateral leg is not allowed)
- Patient contraindicated for the use of antiplatelet therapy
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Patient with a target limb infection being treated
- Patient with a procoagulant blood disease
- Patient with history of contrast agents allergies
- Patient with intolerance to paclitaxel
- Patient with severe renal impairment (GFR \<30 ml / min / 1.73 m²) or patient with a creatinine clearance \<15 ml / min
- External compression of previously implanted stent
- Patient participating in any clinical trial using another investigational drug or product which could interfere with the interpretation of the trial results.
- Patient under trusteeship or guardianship
- Inflow (above) severe lesion \>70% or occlusion untreated satisfactorily (residual lesion\> 50%) before the management of the target lesion
- Perforation, dissection or lesions on the arterial network access requiring an assumption prior to randomization
- Stent fracture grade 4 or 5 at the target lesion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
Clinique Rhône Durance
Avignon, 84000, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon
Besançon, 25030, France
University Hospital of Bordeaux - Hospital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, 33000, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon
Dijon, 21079, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, 69000, France
Hôpital Timone Adultes
Marseille, 130005, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
Polyclinique Les Fleurs
Ollioules, 83190, France
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou - AP-HP de Paris
Paris, 75015, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes
Rennes, 35033, France
Clinique de L'Europe
Rouen, 76100, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de St Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42055, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67091, France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric DUCASSE, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Bordeaux
- STUDY CHAIR
Antoine BENARD, MD
Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche clinique et épidémiologique; University Hospital, Bordeaux
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 5, 2015
First Posted
November 6, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11