Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast and GI Cancers
X7-7
Randomized Open-label Trial of Dose Dense, Fixed Dose Capecitabine Compared to Standard Dose Capecitabine in Metastatic Breast Cancer and Advanced/Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancers.
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
15
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is compare different doses of capecitabine to see if one is better than the other in terms of efficacy and toxicity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 breast-cancer
Started Oct 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_2 breast-cancer
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedDecember 20, 2021
December 1, 2021
7.2 years
October 2, 2015
December 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Twelve-week Progression Free Survival (cohort 1 only)
As the percentage of patients with progression from the date of registration to 12 weeks from that date
12 weeks from the date of registration into the study
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Grade 3 or higher toxicity (cohorts 1 and 2)
From Day 1 of treatment, throughout treatment, up to 2 years from Day 1 of treatment
Other Outcomes (1)
Objective response rate (cohorts 1 and 2)
From Day 1 of treatment, throughout treatment, up to 2 years from Day 1 of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALcapecitabine, 1500 mg, twice a day for 7 days on then 7 days off
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORcapecitabine, 1250 mg/m2 OR 1000 mg/m2, twice a day for 14 days on then 7 days off
Interventions
Capecitabine will be given to participants in Arm A at 1500 mg PO BID for 7 days, followed by a 7 day rest (7-7). Capecitabine will be given to participants in group B at 1250 mg/m2 OR 1000 mg/m2 PO BID for 14 days, followed by a 7 day rest (14-7).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with metastatic breast cancer OR men and women with metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancer
- There is no limit to the number of prior chemotherapy or endocrine therapy regimens received. Use of a previous fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen in advanced / metastatic setting is permitted as long as the subject discontinued the regimen for reasons other than progression.
- No restriction on the use of fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting
- For metastatic colorectal cancers, patients starting maintenance capecitabine after a course of oxaliplatin or irinotecan based chemotherapy are eligible.
- Measurable or non-measurable disease per RECIST criteria 1.1
- Must have completed prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy at least 2 weeks prior to registration
- Pathologic confirmation of respective malignancies. Biopsy of metastatic disease is preferred but not mandatory.
- Performance Status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score (PS) 0-2
- Adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,000/ microLiter (uL)
- hemoglobin ≥ 7 g/L
- platelets ≥ 50,000/uL
- total bilirubin ≤ 2 X the Institutional Upper Limit of Normal (IULN)
- o Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ( Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase \[SGOT\]) ≤ 5 X IULN
- Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) (Serum Pyruvic Glutamic Transaminase \[SPGT\]) ≤ 5 X IULN
- +4 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has used Capecitabine in a past regimen for metastatic disease.
- Patient is currently using, or planning to use another investigational agent.
- Patient with known Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency
- Patient has symptomatic brain or CNS metastases.
- Patient has leptomeningeal disease
- Patient is pregnant or nursing
- Subjects must have no barriers to taking oral medications, for example uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea at baseline, lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome.
- No recent (≤ 3months) of partial or complete bowel obstruction unless surgically corrected.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Qamar Khanlead
Study Sites (15)
University of Kansas Cancer Center - CRC
Fairway, Kansas, 66205, United States
St. Catherine Hospital - Central Care Cancer Center
Garden City, Kansas, 67846, United States
Heartland Cancer Center - Central Care Cancer Center
Great Bend, Kansas, 67530, United States
Hays Medical Center Dreiling-Schmidt Cancer Institute
Hays, Kansas, 67601, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center - West
Kansas City, Kansas, 66112, United States
Olathe Medical Center
Olathe, Kansas, 66061, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center - Overland Park
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210, United States
Via Christi Cancer Center
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762, United States
Salina Regional Health
Salina, Kansas, 67401, United States
St. Francis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center - Westwood
Westwood, Kansas, 66205, United States
Truman Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center - South
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center - North
Kansas City, Missouri, 64154, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center - Lee's Summit
Lee's Summit, Missouri, 64064, United States
Related Publications (32)
Chia SK, Speers CH, D'yachkova Y, Kang A, Malfair-Taylor S, Barnett J, Coldman A, Gelmon KA, O'reilly SE, Olivotto IA. The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2007 Sep 1;110(5):973-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22867.
PMID: 17647245BACKGROUNDLiu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, Warner E. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):110-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.110.
PMID: 8996131BACKGROUNDHofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Muller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70116-X. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
PMID: 22503032BACKGROUNDKopf B, De Giorgi U, Zago S, Carminati O, Rosti G, Marangolo M. Innovative therapy for patients with brain metastases: oral treatments. J Chemother. 2004 Nov;16 Suppl 5:94-7. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.2004.11782396.
PMID: 15675490BACKGROUNDFumoleau P, Largillier R, Clippe C, Dieras V, Orfeuvre H, Lesimple T, Culine S, Audhuy B, Serin D, Cure H, Vuillemin E, Morere JF, Montestruc F, Mouri Z, Namer M. Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2004 Mar;40(4):536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.007.
PMID: 14962720BACKGROUNDOshaughnessy JA, Blum J, Moiseyenko V, Jones SE, Miles D, Bell D, Rosso R, Mauriac L, Osterwalder B, Burger HU, Laws S. Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001 Sep;12(9):1247-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1012281104865.
PMID: 11697835BACKGROUNDBlum JL, Dieras V, Lo Russo PM, Horton J, Rutman O, Buzdar A, Osterwalder B. Multicenter, Phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2001 Oct 1;92(7):1759-68. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:73.0.co;2-a.
PMID: 11745247BACKGROUNDBlum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU, LoRusso PM, Kuter I, Vogel C, Osterwalder B, Burger HU, Brown CS, Griffin T. Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Feb;17(2):485-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.2.485.
PMID: 10080589BACKGROUNDMackean M, Planting A, Twelves C, Schellens J, Allman D, Osterwalder B, Reigner B, Griffin T, Kaye S, Verweij J. Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Sep;16(9):2977-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.9.2977.
PMID: 9738566BACKGROUNDLeonard R, O'Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, Gorbounova V, Chan-Navarro CA, Maraninchi D, Barak-Wigler N, McKendrick JJ, Harker WG, Bexon AS, Twelves C. Detailed analysis of a randomized phase III trial: can the tolerability of capecitabine plus docetaxel be improved without compromising its survival advantage? Ann Oncol. 2006 Sep;17(9):1379-85. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl134.
PMID: 16966367BACKGROUNDNorton L. Conceptual and practical implications of breast tissue geometry: toward a more effective, less toxic therapy. Oncologist. 2005 Jun-Jul;10(6):370-81. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-6-370.
PMID: 15967831BACKGROUNDTraina TA, Dugan U, Higgins B, Kolinsky K, Theodoulou M, Hudis CA, Norton L. Optimizing chemotherapy dose and schedule by Norton-Simon mathematical modeling. Breast Dis. 2010;31(1):7-18. doi: 10.3233/BD-2009-0290.
PMID: 20519801BACKGROUNDTraina TA, Theodoulou M, Feigin K, Patil S, Tan KL, Edwards C, Dugan U, Norton L, Hudis C. Phase I study of a novel capecitabine schedule based on the Norton-Simon mathematical model in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 10;26(11):1797-802. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8388.
PMID: 18398145BACKGROUNDGajria D, Feigin K, Tan LK, Patil S, Geneus S, Theodoulou M, Norton L, Hudis CA, Traina TA. Phase 2 trial of a novel capecitabine dosing schedule in combination with bevacizumab for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2011 Sep 15;117(18):4125-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25992. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
PMID: 21387266BACKGROUNDOu SH, Holcombe RF. Capecitabine in advanced gastric or oesophagogastric cancer: a viewpoint by Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou and Randall F. Holcombe. Drugs. 2007;67(4):611-2. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767040-00011. No abstract available.
PMID: 17352521BACKGROUNDEvans TR, Pentheroudakis G, Paul J, McInnes A, Blackie R, Raby N, Morrison R, Fullarton GM, Soukop M, McDonald AC. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1469-78. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf243.
PMID: 12196374BACKGROUNDHong YS, Song SY, Lee SI, Chung HC, Choi SH, Noh SH, Park JN, Han JY, Kang JH, Lee KS, Cho JY. A phase II trial of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004 Sep;15(9):1344-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh343.
PMID: 15319239BACKGROUNDKoizumi W, Saigenji K, Ujiie S, Terashima M, Sakata Y, Taguchi T; Clinical Study Group of Capecitabine. A pilot phase II study of capecitabine in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Oncology. 2003;64(3):232-6. doi: 10.1159/000069313.
PMID: 12697963BACKGROUNDLee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ, Lee KH, Zang DY, Ryoo BY, Kim JG, Park SR, Kang WK, Shin DB, Ryu MH, Chang HM, Kim TW, Baek JH, Min YJ. A randomised multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008 Aug 19;99(4):584-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604536. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
PMID: 18665164BACKGROUNDQiu MZ, Wei XL, Zhang DS, Jin Y, Zhou YX, Wang DS, Ren C, Bai L, Luo HY, Wang ZQ, Wang FH, Li YH, Yang DJ, Xu RH. Efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy using oxaliplatin and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective observation. Tumour Biol. 2014 May;35(5):4369-75. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1574-5. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
PMID: 24515655BACKGROUNDAjani J. Review of capecitabine as oral treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers. Cancer. 2006 Jul 15;107(2):221-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21986.
PMID: 16770784BACKGROUNDCartwright TH, Cohn A, Varkey JA, Chen YM, Szatrowski TP, Cox JV, Schulz JJ. Phase II study of oral capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 1;20(1):160-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.160.
PMID: 11773165BACKGROUNDBoeck S, Wilkowski R, Bruns CJ, Issels RD, Schulz C, Moosmann N, Laessig D, Haas M, Golf A, Heinemann V. Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2007;73(3-4):221-7. doi: 10.1159/000127413. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
PMID: 18424886BACKGROUNDSaadati H, Saif MW. Capecitabine as salvage therapy for a pancreatic cancer patient with extensive liver metastases and associated impairment of liver function. JOP. 2008 May 8;9(3):354-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 18469454BACKGROUNDPatt YZ, Hassan MM, Aguayo A, Nooka AK, Lozano RD, Curley SA, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, Schnirer II, Wolff RA, Charnsangavej C, Brown TD. Oral capecitabine for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma. Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):578-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20368.
PMID: 15274071BACKGROUNDHoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, Cox J, Kocha W, Kuperminc M, Maroun J, Walde D, Weaver C, Harrison E, Burger HU, Osterwalder B, Wong AO, Wong R. Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr 15;19(8):2282-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2282.
PMID: 11304782BACKGROUNDVan Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J, Allman D, Bajetta E, Boyer M, Bugat R, Findlay M, Frings S, Jahn M, McKendrick J, Osterwalder B, Perez-Manga G, Rosso R, Rougier P, Schmiegel WH, Seitz JF, Thompson P, Vieitez JM, Weitzel C, Harper P; Xeloda Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Nov 1;19(21):4097-106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.21.4097.
PMID: 11689577BACKGROUNDTwelves CJ. Xeloda in Adjuvant Colon Cancer Therapy (X-ACT) trial: overview of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2006 Nov;6(4):278-87. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2006.n.046.
PMID: 17241512BACKGROUNDTwelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP, Abt M, Burris H 3rd, Carrato A, Cassidy J, Cervantes A, Fagerberg J, Georgoulias V, Husseini F, Jodrell D, Koralewski P, Kroning H, Maroun J, Marschner N, McKendrick J, Pawlicki M, Rosso R, Schuller J, Seitz JF, Stabuc B, Tujakowski J, Van Hazel G, Zaluski J, Scheithauer W. Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 30;352(26):2696-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043116.
PMID: 15987918BACKGROUNDStockler M, S.T., Grimison P, et al, A randomized trial of capecitabine (C) given intermittently (IC) rather than continuously (CC) compared to classical CMF as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC). J Clin Oncol, 2007. 25(18S; June 20 suppl). Abstract 1031.
BACKGROUNDSoto C, T.L., Reyes S, et al., Capecitabine (X) and taxanes in patients (pts) with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): sequential vs. combined therapy results from a MOSG randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol., 2006. 24(18S; June 20 suppl). Abstract 570.
BACKGROUNDO'shaughnessy J, B.J., A retrospective evaluation of the impact of dose reduction in patients treated with Xeloda (capecitabine). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 2000. 19: 104a. Abstract 400.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Qamar Khan, MD
University of Kansas Cancer Center - CRC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2015
First Posted
November 3, 2015
Study Start
October 5, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
December 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share