Writing About Experiences With Ovarian Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This online study aims to understand whether writing about one's experiences with ovarian cancer may be beneficial for psychological and physical wellbeing in women with a history of ovarian cancer. Investigators are also interested in studying how certain individual characteristics may impact the effectiveness of writing. Participants will be asked to complete an initial survey (15 min), followed by writing about their experiences with ovarian cancer on four occasions (20 - 25 min each), over the course of two weeks. A final survey (10 min) will be completed one month afterwards.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable ovarian-cancer
Started Apr 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable ovarian-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedMay 23, 2022
May 1, 2022
1.7 years
October 26, 2015
May 16, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Psychological Functioning (Wellbeing/Distress)
Various aspects of social, emotional and functional wellbeing will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer-Ovarian measure (FACT-O, Version 4, Basen-Engquist et al, 2001). Distress about ovarian cancer will be assessed using the Impact of Event Scale (IES, Horowitz, Wilner \& Alvarez, 1979).
6 - 9 weeks, with timely completion of writing: Initial survey (day 1), after 2nd writing task (week 1), after 4th writing task (week 2), and one month after last writing task (week 6)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Physical Wellbeing
6 - 9 weeks, with timely completion of writing: Initial survey (day 1), after 2nd writing task (week 1), after 4th writing task (week 2), and one month after last writing task (week 6)
Changes in affect before and after writing about ovarian cancer
Prior to and after each of 4 writing tasks (weeks 1 - 2)
Study Arms (2)
Expressive Writing
EXPERIMENTALWriting about ovarian cancer: Participants will be asked to write about their deepest thoughts and emotions about their experience with ovarian cancer
Fact Writing (Control)
ACTIVE COMPARATORWriting about ovarian cancer: Participants will be asked to write about the facts of their experience with ovarian cancer
Interventions
Participants will be asked to write about their deepest thoughts and emotions about their experience with ovarian cancer
Participants will be asked to write about the facts of their experience with ovarian cancer
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with a history of ovarian cancer (any stage)
- At least 18 years old
- English-speaking/Can comfortably read and write in English
- Able to provide informed consent
- Internet access
- Valid email address
- Any region/country
You may not qualify if:
- Minors (younger than 18)
- Lack of English proficiency
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Male
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Maryland, College Park
College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States
Related Publications (2)
Merz EL, Fox RS, Malcarne VL. Expressive writing interventions in cancer patients: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(3):339-61. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.882007. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
PMID: 25053218BACKGROUNDFrattaroli J. Experimental disclosure and its moderators: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):823-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.823.
PMID: 17073523BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mary Ann Hoffman, Ph.D.
University of Maryland, College Park
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2015
First Posted
November 2, 2015
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05