Buscopan Versus Acetaminophen for Acute Abdominal Pain in Children
Hyoscine Hydrobromide (Buscopan) Versus Acetaminophen for Acute Abdominal Pain in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
236
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is ample evidence that pain in children is under recognized and under treated. This is especially true for acute abdominal pain, a common complaint in the paediatric emergency department. Clinicians often fear that analgesia will obscure the diagnosis of a potentially surgical condition. As a result, acute abdominal pain goes untreated in many children, as there is no standard of care. Hyoscine N-butylbromide (Buscopan) has been used successfully in adults and children for pain associated with urinary tract infections and kidney stones for over 60 years. However, no study has explored its usefulness in relieving acute abdominal pain in children. The objectives of this study are to investigate to what degree Buscopan is effective in relieving abdominal pain in children compared to acetaminophen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 22, 2019
CompletedMay 2, 2019
April 1, 2019
1.7 years
October 13, 2015
April 30, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Analgesic Efficacy
Pain severity on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
80 minutes post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Analgesic Efficacy
15 minutes post-intervention
Analgesic Efficacy
30 minutes post-intervention
Analgesic Efficacy
45 minutes post-intervention
Analgesic Efficacy
60 minutes post-intervention
Need for Rescue Analgesia
80 minutes post-intervention
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hyoscine butylbromide
EXPERIMENTALHyoscine butylbromide 10mg oral single dose
Acetaminophen
ACTIVE COMPARATORAcetaminophen 15mg/kg oral single dose (maximum 1000mg)
Interventions
Oral single dose
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All children aged 8-17 years presenting to the paediatric ED with:
- A chief complaint of colicky abdominal pain AND
- Pain score of at least 4/10 on the Faces Pain Scale - Revised AND
- A presumed non-surgical etiology
You may not qualify if:
- Prior abdominal surgery
- Concomitant use of other anticholinergic medication including but not limited to tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines, benztropine mesylate
- Signs and symptoms consistent with a bowel obstruction
- Peritoneal signs
- Suspected previous hypersensitivity reaction to either acetaminophen or HBB
- Suspected appendicitis
- History of abdominal trauma within 48 hours of presentation
- Unstable vital signs
- History of bowel obstruction
- Myasthenia gravis
- Fever (aural temperature \> 38.2 C)
- Chronic liver disease
- Persistent vomiting despite administration of oral anti-emetic
- Symptoms and signs consistent with a urinary tract infection
- Symptoms and signs consistent with a toxin ingestion
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A5W9, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Poonai N, Kumar K, Coriolano K, Thompson G, Brahmbhatt S, Dzongowski E, Stevens H, Gupta P, Miller M, Elsie S, Ashok D, Joubert G, Lim R, Butter A, Ali S. Hyoscine butylbromide versus acetaminophen for nonspecific colicky abdominal pain in children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2020 Nov 30;192(48):E1612-E1619. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201055.
PMID: 33257343DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Naveen Poonai, MD
Western University Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2015
First Posted
October 21, 2015
Study Start
March 20, 2017
Primary Completion
December 3, 2018
Study Completion
February 22, 2019
Last Updated
May 2, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share