Thin Wire Versus Thick Wire Snare for Cold Snare Polypectomy of Diminutive Polyps
1 other identifier
interventional
660
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is now common practice and has proven to be a safe and effective technique for removal of diminutive polyps. Both thick and thin wire snares are now commonly used for CSP. However, because of their physical characteristics, thick wire snares might leave a higher percentage of residual adenoma at the resection site. Since this may result in a higher risk of recurrence, the technique needs to be optimized. Experts have suggested that a thin wire snare might be more efficient, with a lower risk of residual adenoma at the resection site and consequently a lower risk of recurrence and interval cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2021
CompletedJune 29, 2023
June 1, 2023
4.5 years
October 15, 2015
June 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incomplete resection rate of diminutive polyps
biopsies of the margin are analysed histologically and if any adenoma is found on biopsy, this means the resection with the cold snare was incomplete
1 year
Percentage of protrusions
cold snare polypectomy can leave a protrusion in the defect, which has previously been shown to be bunched up submucosa. We will record after every polypectomy if a protrusion was visible and if it depends on the snare whether a protrusion occurs or not
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Measurement of the need for second excision in case of endoscopically visual residual adenoma
1 year
Post polypectomy bleeding requiring intervention
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Thin Wire Snare Arm
EXPERIMENTALUse of Thin Wire Snare to resect polyp \<10mm
Thick Wire Snare Arm
EXPERIMENTALUse of Thick Wire Snare to resect polyp \<10mm
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients able to give informed consent to involvement in trial. For patients who do not speak English, an interpreter will be asked to translate the informed consent
- Patients referred to Auburn Hospital Endoscopy Unit for a colonoscopy for whatever reason
- At least 1 lesion \<10mm beyond the rectosigmoid junction without any endoscopic features of malignancy
- At least 1 lesion \<10mm beyond the rectosigmoid junction that according to the proceduralist, can be safely removed with CSP
You may not qualify if:
- Current use of antiplatelets (excluding aspirin) or anticoagulants which have not appropriately been interrupted
- Known coagulopathy
- Pregnancy
- If any doubt about the benign character of the polyp, the patient will be excluded from the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Auburn Hosptial
Auburn, New South Wales, 2144, Australia
Related Publications (1)
Sidhu M, Forbes N, Tate DJ, Desomer L, Lee EYT, Burgess N, van Hattem A, Mcleod D, Cheng E, Cartwright S, Schell A, Hilsden RJ, Heitman SJ, Bourke MJ. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cold Snare Polypectomy Technique: Technique Matters More Than Snare Wire Diameter. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):100. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001554.
PMID: 34817440DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Dr Lee, FRACP
Westmead Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Specialist Gastroenterology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2015
First Posted
October 20, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
July 1, 2021
Last Updated
June 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share