Cap-fitted Colonoscopy: a Randomized, Tandem Colonoscopy Study of Adenoma Miss Rates
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a test in which a thin, black, flexible tube with a lighting system on the end is passed through the anus, into the rectum, in order to examine the large bowel or intestine, also called the colon. Colonoscopy is a very good test for examining the colon for polyps (warty growths that can turn into cancer), but it is not perfect. In fact, about 30% of polyps that are under 5 mm (about 1/5 of an inch) in size are missed during colonoscopy because they are hiding behind folds and bends in the colon. This research study is being done to determine if performing colonoscopy with a cap on the tip of the colonoscope will reduce the miss rate for polyps. A cap is a clear plastic hood that fits on the tip of the colonoscope and sticks out about 1/3 of an inch. During colonoscopy, the cap can be pressed against a fold or ridge in order to flatten it, so that the lining on the other side can be more easily seen. This may reduce the miss rate for colon polyps.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2007
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 22, 2016
CompletedDecember 10, 2018
March 1, 2017
2.9 years
December 11, 2007
July 27, 2015
December 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Adenomas
Cap Fitted Colonoscopy (CFC) may significantly reduced miss rates for colorectal adenomas, specifically for small adenomas. This study is the first North American study of any design and the largest tandem study of CFC. CFC is a safe, simple, and inexpensive technology that could improve the reliability of colonoscopy in detecting colorectal neoplasia. Additional study of CFC in Western populations is warranted.
after the second colonoscopy is completed
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Time for Examination Will be Measured With a Stopwatch, and the Stopwatch Will be Stopped at Any Time a Polyp is Located and Restarted When the Polyp Has Been Removed and Retrieved.
after 2nd colonoscopy was completed in 24hrs
Study Arms (2)
Initial cap-fitted
EXPERIMENTALInitial cap-fitted colonoscopy for the first insertion
Initial regular
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitial regular no cap on the end of the colonoscope for the first insertion
Interventions
Subjects will be randomized to either initial cap-fitted colonoscopy or regular colonoscopy. Patients in the initial regular arm, will undergo cap-fitted colonoscopy for their second, tandem examination. Patients in the initial cap-fitted arm, will under undergo regular colonoscopy (without the cap) for their second, tandem examination.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older, undergoing scheduled colonoscopy and able to give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgical resection of the colon or rectum
- American Society of Anesthesiology class III or higher
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Current use of anticoagulants.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Indiana University Medical Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Related Publications (1)
Hewett DG, Rex DK. Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):775-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.030. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
PMID: 20579648DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Douglas K Rex, MD
- Organization
- Indiana University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas K Rex, MD
Indiana University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2007
First Posted
December 19, 2007
Study Start
November 1, 2006
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
December 10, 2018
Results First Posted
February 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share