NCT02579798

Brief Summary

General anesthesia, even in patients in good health, impairs gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics. These effects result primarily from atelectasis formation. They occur in 85-90% of healthy patients in the minutes following the induction when a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not used. The functional residual capacity (FRC) of obese patients during general anesthesia is even smaller than the one of healthy patients. There is a direct relationship between the body mass index and the decrease of the functional residual capacity. Obese patients have therefore more atelectasis. The increased abdominal pressure during the pneumoperitoneum will increase the decrease of the CRF, and thus aggravate the formation of these atelectasis. Atelectasis affect the peroperative gas exchanges and are likely to be involved in the worsening of postoperative hypoxemia episodes. In addition, atelectasis alter the clearance of secretions and the lymph flow, which predispose to lung infections.Taking all these factors into account, it is logical to think that the atelectasis presence can lead to an increase of the postsurgical morbidity (respiratory distress, infections). That is why actively fighting against the formation of these atelectasis is important. There is a lack of scientific evidence to say that the strategies against atelectasis as PEEP have a significant impact on the patient's postoperative status. The expected clinical benefits balance (reduction of respiratory distress episodes, infections and mortality) versus the risks linked to the maneuvers done to reduce the development of atelectasis (barotraumas, cardiac complications) remains to be determined. The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of two different alveolar recruitment strategies on the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in obese patients after bariatric surgery. The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the number of recruitment maneuvers, the Pa02 / FI02 ratio (ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen), the dynamic compliance, the anatomic dead space and intraoperative PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient (arterial and end tidal gradient) between two alveolar recruitment strategies applied in obese patients during laparoscopic bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy). The tertiary objectives of this study are to report the number of respiratory complications and postoperative wound infections at the 30th postoperative day.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 12, 2015

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 20, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 19, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

October 12, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 18, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Bariatric surgeryPost-surgery hypoxemiaObesity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<90%)

    This will be monitored by a portable saturometer (OxyTrue A, Bluepoint, Germany). This saturometer will allow the investigators to count the number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02\<90%) and their duration in obese patients, in the postoperative period.

    continuously during 48h after surgery

  • Number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02<95%)

    This will be monitored by a portable saturometer (OxyTrue A, Bluepoint, Germany). This saturometer will allow the investigators to count the number of hypoxemia episodes (Sp02\<95%) and their duration in obese patients, in the postoperative period.

    continuously during 48h after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (60)

  • Number of recruitment manoeuvers

    From the beginning of the surgery till moment 1 (after induction/intubation, patient laying flat, without pneumoperitoneum)

  • Number of recruitment manoeuvers

    From moment 1 till moment 2 (after peritoneal insufflation and anti-trendenlenbourg (anti-trent) implementation)

  • Number of recruitment manoeuvers

    From moment 2 till moment 3 (after pneumoperitoneum exsufflation - patient lying flat)

  • Number of recruitment manoeuvers

    From moment 3 till the end of the surgery (patient leaving the theater)

  • Pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cd) - preoperative

    Just before surgery, at ambient air contact

  • +55 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PEEP 10 cmH20

EXPERIMENTAL

In this group, a PEEP of 10 cmH20 is applied for the duration of the intervention and a recruitment maneuver is applied each time the SpO2 (oxygen pulsated saturation) drops below 95%.

Device: PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)

optimal PEEP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this group, 10 cmH20 PEEP is applied immediately. Then the "optimal PEEP" is sought at three key moments. It is determined by the best value of lung compliance found in the patient. It is sought by increasing or decreasing the value of the PEEP by increments or decrements of 2 cmH20. If after 6 respiratory cycles, the value of the compliance is increased, the investigator continues to increase the value of the PEEP. On the other hand, if the value of compliance is reduced, the investigator reduces the value of PEEP. The value of the PEEP selected shall in no event exceed the set pressure range (maximum pressure plate of 30 cmH20 and maximum inspiratory peak pressure 40cmH20). A recruitment maneuver is applied each time the SpO2 drops below 95%, as in the PEEP 10cmH2O group.

Device: PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)

Interventions

PEEP 10 cmH20optimal PEEP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists ) of II or III
  • BMI \> 35 kg/m²
  • Elective laparoscopic bariatric surgery: gastric bypass or sleeve

You may not qualify if:

  • Restrictive (CPT \<65%) or obstructive (VEMS/CV \< 69%) chronic lung disease
  • Increase of the intracranial pressure
  • History of smoking with chronic obstructive disease (VEMS/CV)
  • Active tabagism
  • Ongoing pregnancy
  • History of heart failure (NYHA III or IV) or coronary artery disease
  • Urgent surgery
  • Allergy to a drug used within the study
  • Lack of written informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Brugmann

Brussels, 1020, Belgium

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1491-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111743.61132.99.

    PMID: 15105237BACKGROUND
  • Imberger G, McIlroy D, Pace NL, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Moller AM. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for the prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;(9):CD007922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007922.pub2.

    PMID: 20824871BACKGROUND
  • Eichenberger A, Proietti S, Wicky S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Morbid obesity and postoperative pulmonary atelectasis: an underestimated problem. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1788-92, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00060.

    PMID: 12456460BACKGROUND
  • Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, Kendrick ML, Que FL, Williams BA, Joyner MJ, Hubmayr RD, Warner DO, Sprung J. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):298-305. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a.

    PMID: 16368847BACKGROUND
  • Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, Chanques G, Kwiatkoskwi F, Jaber S, Bazin JE. Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1310-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc640a.

    PMID: 21068660BACKGROUND
  • Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, Alhashemi JA. Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):862-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep084. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

    PMID: 19403595BACKGROUND
  • Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S, Sundbom M, Duvernoy O, Pelosi P, Hedenstierna G, Freden F. Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):979-87. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b87edb.

    PMID: 19809292BACKGROUND
  • Pelosi P, Ravagnan I, Giurati G, Panigada M, Bottino N, Tredici S, Eccher G, Gattinoni L. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology. 1999 Nov;91(5):1221-31. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00011.

    PMID: 10551570BACKGROUND
  • Tusman G, Bohm SH, Suarez-Sipmann F, Turchetto E. Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Aug-Sep;51(7):723-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018433.

    PMID: 15310643BACKGROUND
  • Maisch S, Reissmann H, Fuellekrug B, Weismann D, Rutkowski T, Tusman G, Bohm SH. Compliance and dead space fraction indicate an optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure after recruitment in anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):175-81, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287684.74505.49.

    PMID: 18165575BACKGROUND
  • Strang CM, Hachenberg T, Freden F, Hedenstierna G. Development of atelectasis and arterial to end-tidal PCO2-difference in a porcine model of pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):298-303. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep102. Epub 2009 May 13.

    PMID: 19443420BACKGROUND
  • Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):580-584. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143339.40385.1B.

    PMID: 15673897BACKGROUND
  • Hans GA, Sottiaux TM, Lamy ML, Joris JL. Ventilatory management during routine general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jan;26(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b000e000000f1fb.

    PMID: 19122544BACKGROUND
  • Mercat A, Richard JC, Vielle B, Jaber S, Osman D, Diehl JL, Lefrant JY, Prat G, Richecoeur J, Nieszkowska A, Gervais C, Baudot J, Bouadma L, Brochard L; Expiratory Pressure (Express) Study Group. Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):646-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.646.

    PMID: 18270353BACKGROUND
  • Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Brazzi L, Caironi P. Positive end-expiratory pressure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Feb;16(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283354723.

    PMID: 19996966BACKGROUND
  • Van Hecke D, Bidgoli JS, Van der Linden P. Does Lung Compliance Optimization Through PEEP Manipulations Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Hypoxemia in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery? A Randomized Trial. Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1268-1275. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03662-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Interventions

Positive-Pressure Respiration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration, ArtificialAirway ManagementTherapeuticsRespiratory Therapy

Study Officials

  • Philippe Van der Linden, MD

    CHU Brugmann

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Van Hecke Delphine, MD

    CHU Brugmann

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of clinic

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2015

First Posted

October 20, 2015

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

January 19, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations