30-Days Post-Operative Complications in Bariatric Surgery
Bariatric
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) With Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) in Bariatric Surgery; 30-Days Post-Operative Complications in Bariatric Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
116
1 country
1
Brief Summary
comparison of 30-days post-operative outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2021
CompletedMarch 3, 2021
February 1, 2021
8 months
February 7, 2021
February 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Frequency of Anastomotic Leakage in Each Study Arm
Patients were examined on postoperative 30 days for the presence of Anastomotic leakage
within the first 30 days after surgery
Frequency of Bleeding in Each Study Arm
Patients were examined postoperative for the presence of bleeding
24 hours after surgery
Number of Infections in Each Study Arm
Patients were examined on postoperative 30 days for the presence of Wound infections
30 days
Mortality in Each Study Arm
Patients were followed for 30 days and number of mortalities was noted on each arm
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Hospital Stay
30 days
Study Arms (2)
LRYGB Procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORLRYGB technique was performed by placing 4 to 6 trocars, a 150 cm ante-colic Roux-limb gastric pouch (30 to 50 ml) was created with linear stapled or circular stapled gastro-jejunostomy, a 50-cm long biliopancreatic limb was chosen. A passive drainage was kept near to the gastro-jejunostomy.
LSG Procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATOR35 Fr bougie was used for the calibration of a gastric tube. 3 to 6 cm of longitudinal incision of the stomach was done at pylorus to the angle of His. Using of absorbable suture, the staple line was sewn.
Interventions
We compared the 30 days outcomes in patients who underwent LSG procedure with those who underwent LRYGB
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients of age 18 to 65 years
- body mass index (BMI) \>35 kg/m2 (Morbidly obese)
- Patients with failed conservative treatment of weight control
You may not qualify if:
- Severe indicative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
- Conversion of another bariatric procedure
- Large hiatal hernia
- Patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Multan Medical and Dental College
Multan, Punjab Province, 57000, Pakistan
Related Publications (7)
Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D, Karnieli E. The metabolic syndrome--from insulin resistance to obesity and diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;37(3):559-79, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2008.05.002.
PMID: 18775352BACKGROUNDChooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2019 Mar;92:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
PMID: 30253139BACKGROUNDSiddiqui M, Hameed R, Nadeem M, Mohammad T, Simbak N, Latif A, et al. Obesity in Pakistan; current and future perceptions. J Curr Trends Biomed Eng Biosci. 2018;17:001-004
BACKGROUNDAdams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, Kolotkin RL, LaMonte MJ, Pendleton RC, Strong MB, Vinik R, Wanner NA, Hopkins PN, Gress RE, Walker JM, Cloward TV, Nuttall RT, Hammoud A, Greenwood JL, Crosby RD, McKinlay R, Simper SC, Smith SC, Hunt SC. Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA. 2012 Sep 19;308(11):1122-31. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11164.
PMID: 22990271BACKGROUNDSuter M, Donadini A, Romy S, Demartines N, Giusti V. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: significant long-term weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life. Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):267-73. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182263b66.
PMID: 21772127BACKGROUNDLi K, Gao F, Xue H, Jiang Q, Wang Y, Shen Q, Tian Y, Yang Y. Comparative study on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Mar-Apr;61(130):319-22.
PMID: 24901132BACKGROUNDPeterli R, Borbely Y, Kern B, Gass M, Peters T, Thurnheer M, Schultes B, Laederach K, Bueter M, Schiesser M. Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2013 Nov;258(5):690-4; discussion 695. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a67426.
PMID: 23989054BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant General and laparoscopic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2021
First Posted
March 3, 2021
Study Start
June 13, 2018
Primary Completion
February 12, 2019
Study Completion
October 12, 2019
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share