NCT02574052

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether exposure to nutrition information with or without nutrition education would influence college students' dietary choices and improved the previous photographs-based dietary assessment tools.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 7, 2015

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 12, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 12, 2015

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

October 7, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 9, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Menu Labelling;Nutrition Education;dietary assessment tools;

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Descriptive Name of Scale: Composite outcome measure of calorie (kcal/day), protein(g/day), fat intake (g/day) and carbohydrate intake (g/day) of participants

    Through the receiving photographs the participants took about their three meals, the investigators estimated the calorie content (kcal/day), protein content (g/day), fat content (g/day), carbohydrate content (g/day) participants ate.

    up to six weeks

Study Arms (1)

Behavioral

OTHER

The whole experiment was divided into three phases with each phase lasting two weeks. First Stage-Behavioral: just record participants' food choices Second Stage-Behavioral: menu labelling without nutrition education Third Stage- Behavioral; menu labelling with nutrition education

Behavioral: participants' food choicesBehavioral: menu labelling without nutrition educationBehavioral: menu labelling with nutrition education

Interventions

just recorded the participants' food choices in the school cafeteria

Behavioral

The investigators provided every participant with a menu labeling without any interpretation and recorded their dietary selections

Behavioral

The investigators not only sent a menu labeling to every participant, but also delivered nutrition education to participants by providing them with nutrition and health knowledge through WeChat daily.

Behavioral

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Grade 2012, 2013 undergraduate students and Grade 2013 graduate students

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who sent the photographs less than six times in any one of the three meals at any stage
  • Participants who did not complete their questionnaires
  • Participants who withdrew from the experiment at any stage

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (11)

  • Chu YH, Frongillo EA, Jones SJ, Kaye GL. Improving patrons' meal selections through the use of point-of-selection nutrition labels. Am J Public Health. 2009 Nov;99(11):2001-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.153205. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

    PMID: 19762664BACKGROUND
  • Harnack LJ, French SA, Oakes JM, Story MT, Jeffery RW, Rydell SA. Effects of calorie labeling and value size pricing on fast food meal choices: results from an experimental trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Dec 5;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-63.

    PMID: 19061510BACKGROUND
  • Elbel B, Gyamfi J, Kersh R. Child and adolescent fast-food choice and the influence of calorie labeling: a natural experiment. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Apr;35(4):493-500. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.4. Epub 2011 Feb 15.

    PMID: 21326209BACKGROUND
  • Finkelstein EA, Strombotne KL, Chan NL, Krieger J. Mandatory menu labeling in one fast-food chain in King County, Washington. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.019.

    PMID: 21238859BACKGROUND
  • Sinclair SE, Cooper M, Mansfield ED. The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Sep;114(9):1375-1388.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

    PMID: 25037558BACKGROUND
  • Conklin MT, Cranage DA, Lambert CU. College students' use of point of selection nutrition information. Top Clin Nutr 2005;20:97-108.

    BACKGROUND
  • Huybregts L, Roberfroid D, Lachat C, Van Camp J, Kolsteren P. Validity of photographs for food portion estimation in a rural West African setting. Public Health Nutr. 2008 Jun;11(6):581-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000870. Epub 2007 Aug 9.

    PMID: 17686204BACKGROUND
  • Lazarte CE, Encinas ME, Alegre C, Granfeldt Y. Validation of digital photographs, as a tool in 24-h recall, for the improvement of dietary assessment among rural populations in developing countries. Nutr J. 2012 Aug 29;11:61. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-61.

    PMID: 22931128BACKGROUND
  • Martin CK, Correa JB, Han H, Allen HR, Rood JC, Champagne CM, Gunturk BK, Bray GA. Validity of the Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM) for estimating energy and nutrient intake in near real-time. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Apr;20(4):891-9. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.344. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

    PMID: 22134199BACKGROUND
  • Farley TA, Caffarelli A, Bassett MT, Silver L, Frieden TR. New York City's fight over calorie labeling. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):w1098-109. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1098. Epub 2009 Oct 6.

  • Roberto CA, Larsen PD, Agnew H, Baik J, Brownell KD. Evaluating the impact of menu labeling on food choices and intake. Am J Public Health. 2010 Feb;100(2):312-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160226. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Nutrition Assessment

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationEpidemiologic MeasurementsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Yexuan Tao, PH.D, M.D

    Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2015

First Posted

October 12, 2015

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion

November 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 12, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-10