Comparing Rectus Sheath Catheter to Epidural Post Cystectomy
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Surgically Placed Rectus Sheath Catheters for Open Radical Cystectomy: Is There a Difference in Patient Outcomes?
2 other identifiers
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective randomised controlled trial that will compare the outcomes of rectus sheath catheters to epidurals in patients who have undergone a cystectomy, via a lower midline abdominal incision for bladder cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedNovember 2, 2016
October 1, 2016
1.3 years
October 6, 2015
October 31, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative post-operative opioid consumption
To Day 3 post-op
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Visual Analogue Score pain score
within 4 hours post-operatively and on days 1, 2 and 3 post-operatively
Patient total intraoperative Opioid requirement
Intraoperatively
Total patient fluid requirements throughout hospital admission
From the start of the operation to day 3 post-operatively.
Recorded evidence of hypotension
Until Day 3 postoperatively
Duration of post-operative ileus
This will be measured during the patients' inpatient hospital stay - usually up to a maximum of 10 days.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Rectus Sheath Catheter Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will have rectus sheath catheters surgically inserted with infusion of 0.125% Bupivicaine at 5mls an hour.
Epidural Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will have a standard epidural placement with infusion of 0.125% Bupivicaine at an initial rate of 5mls/hour, titrated to response
Interventions
Patients in this group will have an epidural inserted in a standard fashion, prior to the induction of anesthesia. These will be infused with 0.125% Bupivicaine at an initial rate of 5mls/hour, titrated to response. Patients will also receive a patient controlled analgesia with hydromorphone 0.2mg/ml, bolus of 200 micrograms with 6 minute lock out (variable in accordance with anesthetic preference).
Patients in this group will have surgically inserted rectus sheath catheters (bilaterally), immediately prior to closure of the anterior abdominal wall. These will be infused with 0.125% Bupivicaine at 5mls an hour at a standard rate.Patients will also receive a patient controlled analgesia with hydromorphone 0.2mg/ml, bolus of 200 micrograms with 6 minute lock out (variable in accordance with anesthetic preference).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over or equal to the age of 19 years old who can understand the study protocol and are able to give consent
- Patients with an American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) classification 1 to 3
- Patients must have a preoperative oral 24 hour opioid consumption of less than or equal to 30mg morphine equivalents
- Patients must be able to understand and be able to use patient controlled analgesia
- Patients must be undergoing a cystectomy with an infra-umbilical midline incision
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with BMI greater than 40
- Patients with an allergy to local anaesthetics
- Patients who are contraindicated to having an epidural (e.g. coagulopathic, distorted anatomy, patient refusal, infection at the site of proposed insertion)
- Patients with previous spinal surgery at the proposed site of epidural
- Patients with neurodegenerative disorders or spinal cord injury
- Patients with known anatomy that would not permit placement of the rectus sheath catheters e.g. Prune Belly Syndrome
- Patients undergoing another complex abdominal procedure in addition to cystectomy and reconstruction requiring extension of the abdominal incision above the umbilicus.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vancouver Coastal Healthlead
- University of British Columbiacollaborator
- Vancouver Prostate Centrecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vancouver Prostate Centre, Dept. Urologic Sciences
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6K 2H4, Canada
Related Publications (7)
Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD, Silberstein J, Keren Paz GE, Donat SM, Coleman JA, Mathew S, Vickers A, Schnorr GC, Feuerstein MA, Rapkin B, Parra RO, Herr HW, Laudone VP. Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
PMID: 25496767BACKGROUNDBlock BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.
PMID: 14612482BACKGROUNDRigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, Collins KS; MASTER Anaethesia Trial Study Group. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1276-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08266-1.
PMID: 11965272BACKGROUNDReady LB. Acute pain: lessons learned from 25,000 patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;24(6):499-505. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(99)90038-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 10588551BACKGROUNDGustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group. Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):571-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.309. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
PMID: 21242424BACKGROUNDGuillotreau J, Game X, Mouzin M, Doumerc N, Mallet R, Sallusto F, Malavaud B, Rischmann P. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery. J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):554-9; discussion 559. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
PMID: 19084856BACKGROUNDDutton TJ, McGrath JS, Daugherty MO. Use of rectus sheath catheters for pain relief in patients undergoing major pelvic urological surgery. BJU Int. 2014 Feb;113(2):246-53. doi: 10.1111/bju.12316. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
PMID: 23937574BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin E Gleave, MD
University of British Columbia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Urologic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2015
First Posted
October 9, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 2, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10