NCT04139590

Brief Summary

A large number of patients experience significant pain after surgery, and more patients report pain after discharge from hospital than before. This issue has been observed in patients who receive peripheral nerve blocks, the effects of which often wear off after discharge. There are numerous barriers to the effective control of pain away from the direct supervision of medical professionals, and personalized management strategies are necessary in order to overcome these barriers. The first step of adequate pain management is accurate pain assessment. Therefore, this study aims to validate a smartphone-based pain assessment tool that patients can access at home.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
155

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 25, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 26, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 26, 2016

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 25, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

April 30, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

postoperative painVisual Analogue ScaleNumeric Rating ScaleSmartphone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Scale Agreement at Time Zero: Difference between two modes of administration of the visual analogue scale (VAS-100)

    Comparison of two modes of administration of the VAS-100 (paper and smartphone). Investigators will report only the mean difference in pain intensity between the two scales.Both scales will be administered adjacently, the order will be randomly assigned.

    Time zero took place in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) within 15 minutes of emergence from general anesthesia or procedural sedation, after being deemed appropriate to assess by the bedside nurse

  • Scale Agreement at Time Zero: Difference between two modes of administration of the numeric rating scale (NRS-11)

    Comparison of two modes of administration of the NRS-11 (paper and smartphone). Investigators will report only the mean difference in pain intensity between the two scales.Both scales will be administered adjacently, the order will be randomly assigned.

    Time zero took place in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) within 15 minutes of emergence from general anesthesia or procedural sedation, after being deemed appropriate to assess by the bedside nurse

  • Scale Agreement at Time One: Difference between two modes of administration of the visual analogue scale (VAS-100)

    Comparison of two modes of administration of the VAS-100 (paper and smartphone). Investigators will report only the mean difference in pain intensity between the two scales.Both scales will be administered adjacently, the order will be randomly assigned.

    Time One occurred when the patient met the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge criteria as per institutional protocol, modified from PADSS (post anesthesia discharge scoring system), with minimum score 9/10. Up to 72 hours.

  • Scale Agreement at Time One: Difference between two modes of administration of the numeric rating scale (NRS-11)

    Comparison of two modes of administration of the NRS-11 (paper and smartphone). Investigators will report only the mean difference in pain intensity between the two scales.Both scales will be administered adjacently, the order will be randomly assigned.

    Time One occurred when the patient met the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge criteria as per institutional protocol, modified from PADSS (post anesthesia discharge scoring system), with minimum score 9/10. Up to 72 hours.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Preference of smartphone app or traditional visual analogue scale (VAS-100)

    Before PACU discharge, the subjects were asked whether they preferred the Smartphone app, the original tool, or had no preference.

  • Preference of smartphone app or traditional numeric rating scale (NRS-11)

    Before PACU discharge, the subjects were asked whether they preferred the Smartphone app, the original tool, or had no preference.

Study Arms (4)

Visual Analogue Scale - Original

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants indicated the intensity of their pain by marking a "X" along the original paper version of the Visual Analogue Scale.

Device: Visual Analogue Scale - Original

Visual Analogue Scale - Panda

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants indicated the intensity of their pain by marking a "X" on the smartphone screen using the Panda of the Visual Analogue Scale.

Device: Panda

Numeric Rating Scale - Original

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants indicated the intensity of their pain by marking a "X" along the original paper version of the Numeric Rating Scale.

Device: Visual Analogue Scale - Original

Numeric Rating Scale - Panda

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants indicated the intensity of their pain by marking a "X" on the smartphone screen using the Panda of the Numeric Rating Scale.

Device: Panda

Interventions

PandaDEVICE
Numeric Rating Scale - PandaVisual Analogue Scale - Panda
Numeric Rating Scale - OriginalVisual Analogue Scale - Original

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 19 to 75
  • ASA status I-III
  • Undergoing a procedure with anticipated post-surgical pain

You may not qualify if:

  • Undergoing eye surgery
  • Significant cognitive impairment or neurological injury
  • Psychomotor dysfunction
  • Visual impairment
  • Admission to the Intensive Care Unit.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Mount Saint Joseph Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5T 3N4, Canada

Location

St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Y 0A9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Sun T, West N, Ansermino JM, Montgomery CJ, Myers D, Dunsmuir D, Lauder GR, von Baeyer CL. A smartphone version of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and the Color Analog Scale for postoperative pain assessment in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Dec;25(12):1264-73. doi: 10.1111/pan.12790.

    PMID: 26507916BACKGROUND
  • Sunderland S, Yarnold CH, Head SJ, Osborn JA, Purssell A, Peel JK, Schwarz SK. Regional Versus General Anesthesia and the Incidence of Unplanned Health Care Resource Utilization for Postoperative Pain After Wrist Fracture Surgery: Results From a Retrospective Quality Improvement Project. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;41(1):22-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000325.

    PMID: 26650425BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Cynthia Yarnold, MD

    Providence Health & Services

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants had to use versions of the scale. They were randomized to using Panda or the original version of the scales first. Scores obtained using the two versions are then compared.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2018

First Posted

October 25, 2019

Study Start

July 25, 2016

Primary Completion

August 26, 2016

Study Completion

August 26, 2016

Last Updated

October 25, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Locations