Muscle Relaxants on Efficacy of LMA Insertion
LMA_MR
Comparison of the Clinical Performances of Flexible Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Patients Under General Anesthesia With or Without Muscle Relaxant: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is increasing in pediatric anesthesia because it provides lesser direct mechanical stimulation of the airway due to being placed above the larynx. However, LMA insertion can be more difficult in children than in adults due to their unique characteristics of pediatric airway. Neuromuscular blocking agents, so-called, muscle relaxants have long been used to facilitate insertion of airway devices. But there are pros and cons for the efficacy of muscle relaxants in LMA insertion, and most studies were investigated in adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2019
CompletedOctober 25, 2019
October 1, 2019
1.3 years
March 15, 2018
October 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)
It was determined by the method describe by Lopez-Gil and colleagues. Briefly, it was measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at a fixed gas flow of 3l/min, recording the airway pressure at which audible leak sound was heard.
During 1 min after successful LMA intubation
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Intubation time
During 5-10 min after inhalation of sevoflurane
Ease of intubation/mask bagging
During 5-10 min after inhalation of sevoflurane
Fiberoptic view of LMA
During 5min after successful LMA insertion
Mean blood pressure
During 5-10 min after inhalation of sevoflurane
Heart rate
During 5-10 min after inhalation of sevoflurane
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MR group
ACTIVE COMPARATORWhen the patients asleep, 0.3 mg/kg rocuronium is administered.
NMR group
EXPERIMENTALWhen the patients asleep, 0.3 mg/kg saline is administered.
Interventions
After standard anesthetic monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure monitor, pulse oximetry, 3-lead echocardiography), patients are inhaled with sevoflurane. When the patients asleep, 0.3 mg/kg rocuronium is administered. After 2 min, flexible laryngeal mask airway (fLMA) is inserted using standard method. The fLMA is inflated with air to 40 cmH2O using manometry. The oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) was determined by the method described by Lopez-Gil and colleagues.
After standard anesthetic monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure monitor, pulse oximetry, 3-lead echocardiography), patients are inhaled with sevoflurane. When the patients asleep, 0.3 mg/kg saline is administered. After 2 min, flexible laryngeal mask airway (fLMA) is inserted using standard method. The fLMA is inflated with air to 40 cmH2O using manometry. The oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) was determined by the method described by Lopez-Gil and colleagues
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged between 2 and 7 years of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) I or II who are planned to receive ophthalmic surgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of consent
- Present URI or other respiratory symptoms
- Oro or facial anomaly
- Poor dental condition
- who cannot open their mouth or limited mouth opening
- when the tracheal intubation is definitely needed
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
Daegu, 42472, South Korea
Related Publications (6)
Gong YH, Yi J, Zhang Q, Xu L. Effect of low dose rocuronium in preventing ventilation leak for flexible laryngeal mask airway during radical mastectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):13616-21. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26550303BACKGROUNDvon Ungern-Sternberg BS, Boda K, Chambers NA, Rebmann C, Johnson C, Sly PD, Habre W. Risk assessment for respiratory complications in paediatric anaesthesia: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2010 Sep 4;376(9743):773-83. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61193-2.
PMID: 20816545BACKGROUNDGhai B, Wig J. Comparison of different techniques of laryngeal mask placement in children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jun;22(3):400-4. doi: 10.1097/aco.0b013e3283294d06.
PMID: 19434792BACKGROUNDHattori K, Komasawa N, Miyazaki Y, Kido H, Deguchi S, Minami T. Muscle relaxant facilitates i-gel insertion by novice doctors: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.058. Epub 2016 May 4.
PMID: 27555168BACKGROUNDChen BZ, Tan L, Zhang L, Shang YC. Is muscle relaxant necessary in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery with a ProSeal LMA? J Clin Anesth. 2013 Feb;25(1):32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
PMID: 23122973BACKGROUNDByun SH, Kim SJ, Kim E. Comparison of the clinical performance of the flexible laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients under general anesthesia with or without a muscle relaxant: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jan 9;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3141-2.
PMID: 30626406DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Eugene Kim, MD, PhD
Assistant professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2018
First Posted
April 3, 2018
Study Start
April 20, 2018
Primary Completion
July 30, 2019
Study Completion
July 31, 2019
Last Updated
October 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share