Fentanyl and Propofol for Tracheal Intubation During Sevoflurane Induction Without Muscle Relaxants in Children
Using Fentanyl and Propofol for Tracheal Intubation During Sevoflurane Induction Without Muscle Relaxants in Children: a Randomized Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Several methods have been proposed to improve intubating conditions and minimize sevoflurane induction time during sevoflurane induction in children. These include clonidine premedication, \[5\] addition of nitrous oxide, \[6\] opioids, \[7,8\] or propofol \[9\]. Four Studies evaluated sevoflurane alone for intubation (9-12).Aim of this study: is to evaluate the effects of two different dose of propofol preceded by a fixed dose of fentanyl during sevoflurane induction on quality of tracheal intubation in children undergoing elective surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 8, 2016
November 1, 2016
1.2 years
May 2, 2015
November 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The incidence of excellent intubating conditions
Intubating conditions will be evaluated as proposed by Viby-Mogensen and colleagues . Five factors will be considered for assessment, jaw relaxation; ease of laryngoscopy; vocal cord position; coughing; and patient movement as excellent (1), good (2) or poor (3). Overall intubating conditions will be recorded as 'excellent' if all score 1, 'good' if any scored 2, and 'poor' if there will be any scores of 3. Intubation will not be attempted if the vocal cords is closed to avoid airway complications and any failure to intubate the trachea or prolonged coughing on intubation will be managed using suxamethonium or a non-depolarising muscle relaxant where clinically indicated.
during start of endotracheal intubation (10 seconds)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The hemodynamic response
15 minutes
The duration of intubation
during endotracheal intubation (30 seconds)
number of intubation attempts
5 minutes
occurrence of complication
1 day
Study Arms (2)
Group1
ACTIVE COMPARATORcomparison of different dosages of drugs ( Fentanyl / Propofol), fentanyl 2 μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg Both test drugs will be made up to 10 ml with saline. fentanyl will be first administered intravenously over 30 s followed by propofol over 20 s.
Group 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORcomparison of different dosages of drug ( Fentanyl / Propofol) ,fentanyl 2 μg/kg and propofol 3 mg/kg. Both test drugs will be made up to 10 ml with saline. fentanyl will be first administered intravenously over 30 s followed by propofol over 20 s.
Interventions
fentanyl 2 μg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg Both test drugs will be made up to 10 ml with saline. fentanyl will be first administered intravenously over 30 s followed by propofol over 20 s.
fentanyl 2 μg/kg and propofol 3 mg/kg. Both test drugs will be made up to 10 ml with saline. fentanyl will be first administered intravenously over 30 s followed by propofol over 20 s.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA physical status I and II patients, Undergoing elective ENT surgery
You may not qualify if:
- History or examination suggested a potentially difficult intubation,
- Significant respiratory disease or poorly controlled asthma,
- gastrooesophageal reflux,
- neurological or neuromuscular disease,
- any condition that would preclude the use of this technique,
- known sensitivity to the drugs used,
- history or examination suggestive of cardiac illness,
- history of respiratory tract infection in the previous 2 weeks,
- history of malignant hyperthermia or other myopathy,
- who refused to undergo an inhalational induction,
- Children in whom i.v. access had already been established.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Saud University
Riyadh, 11411, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ashraf A Abdelhalim, MD
King Saud University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2015
First Posted
May 13, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11