Second-line Irinotecan and Capecitabine Versus Irinotecan for Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer
Effect of Second-line Irinotecan and Capecitabine Versus Irinotecan Alone in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Progressed After First-line Gemcitabine and Cisplatin: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to investigate the effect of second-line irinotecan and capecitabine versus irinotecan alone for gemcitabine and cisplatin refractory advanced biliary tract cancer patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedFebruary 13, 2018
February 1, 2018
2.1 years
September 21, 2015
February 10, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression Free Survival
PFS
within 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Overall Survival
within 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Irinotecan and Capecitabine
EXPERIMENTALirinotecan 180mg/m2 d1, capecitabine 1000mg/m2 bid d1-10, q2w
Irinotecan
ACTIVE COMPARATORirinotecan 180mg/m2 d1, q2w
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with histologically confirmed advanced biliary tract cancer who had experienced progression during first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin
- Age 18 years or older
- Measurable reference cancer site(s) confirmed with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of at least 70%
- Adequate renal function, adequate hepatic function, adequate bone marrow function
You may not qualify if:
- The presence of any severe concomitant disease that could interrupt the planned treatment
- Intractable pain
- Hypersensitivity to study drugs
- Serious cardiovascular disease
- If female, pregnancy or breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
First affiliated hospital, Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Cancer Biotherapy Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2015
First Posted
September 24, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 30, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
February 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02