Prophylactic Topical Agents in Reducing Radiation-Induced Dermatitis in Patients With Non-inflammatory Breast Cancer
Curcumin-II
Effectiveness of Prophylactic Topical Agents for Radiation Dermatitis
5 other identifiers
interventional
191
1 country
6
Brief Summary
This randomized pilot phase II trial studies and compares prophylactic topical agents in reducing radiation-induced dermatitis in patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer or breast cancer in situ. The prophylactic topical agents, such as curcumin-based gel or HPR Plus, may reduce the severity of the radiation-induced dermatitis by minimizing water loss and inflammation during radiation therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Oct 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 13, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 6, 2017
CompletedNovember 6, 2017
October 1, 2017
12 months
July 23, 2015
August 28, 2017
October 4, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Mean Radiation Dermatitis Severity (RDS) Score. Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)
The mean 1 week post-RT RDS score for each arm will be compared using ANOVA to determine if the topical interventions reduce the severity of skin reactions at the end of RT. The RDS score ranges from 0-4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline up to 1 week post radiation therapy
Incidence of Moist Desquamation (Present vs. Absent)
The degree to which each topical intervention decreases the incidence of moist desquamation will be examined using Fisher's exact test. Each agent's potential as a preventative intervention will be determined through comparison of the proportion of subjects with no to minimal radiation dermatitis within each arm using Fisher's exact test.
Baseline up to completion of radiation therapy
Change in the Severity of Skin Reactions Using the Radiation Dermatitis Scale (RDS). Range: 0 (no Dermatitis) - 4 (Violaceous Erythema With Diffuse Desquamation Occurring in Sheets; Patchy Crusting; Superficial Ulceration)
The mean 1 week post-RT RDS score for each arm will be compared using ANOVA to determine if the topical interventions reduce the severity of skin reactions after completion of RT. The RDS score ranges from 0-4 with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline to up to 1 week after completion of radiation therapy
Study Arms (3)
Arm I (curcumin-based gel)
EXPERIMENTALPatients apply curcumin-based gel topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy.
Arm II (HPR Plus)
EXPERIMENTALPatients apply HPR Plusâ„¢ topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy.
Arm III (placebo gel)
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients apply placebo gel topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy.
Interventions
Applied topically
Correlative studies
Apply placebo gel topically
Ancillary studies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects with a diagnosis of non-inflammatory breast cancer or carcinoma in situ
- Subjects must be prescribed and scheduled for "conventional fractionated" RT without concurrent chemotherapy; bolus and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are permitted; lymph node irradiation (i.e., internal mammary nodes, supraclavicular nodes, axillary nodes, etc) as part of their prescribed radiation therapy are permitted; conventional fractionated radiation therapy regimens eligible for study are described below:
- Minimal (min) total dose: whole breast: 44 gray (Gy); breast boost: 10 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 50.0 Gy; lymph nodes: 45 Gy
- Maximal (max) total dose: whole breast: 50.4 Gy; breast boost: 20 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 66.0 Gy; lymph nodes: 50.4 Gy
- Min dose per fraction: whole breast: 1.8 Gy; breast boost: 2.0 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 1.8 Gy; lymph nodes: 1.8 Gy
- Max dose per fraction: whole breast: 2.0 Gy; breast boost: 2.0 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 2.0 Gy; lymph nodes: 2.0 Gy
- Min # of fractions: whole breast: 22 Gy; breast boost: 5 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 25 Gy; lymph nodes: 25 Gy
- Max # of fractions: whole breast: 28 Gy; breast boost: 10 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 36 Gy; lymph nodes: 28 Gy
- Min # of sessions: whole breast: 22 Gy; breast boost: 5 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 25 Gy; lymph nodes: 25 Gy
- Max # of sessions: whole breast: 28 Gy; breast boost: 10 Gy; tumor bed = whole breast +/- boost: 36 Gy; lymph nodes: 28 Gy
- Subjects may or may not have had surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy) prior to RT; (NOTE: surgery is not required for eligibility)
- Subjects may have had chemotherapy prior to radiation; a minimum of two weeks is required between end of chemotherapy and start of RT
- Subjects may be currently prescribed hormone treatment or Herceptin therapy
- Subjects must be able to read, speak, and understand English
- Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant females are ineligible; all subjects of childbearing potential will be asked if they are pregnant or could be pregnant; the patient must respond "no" to continue with radiation and to participate in this clinical study
- Subjects with bilateral breast cancer are not eligible
- Subjects receiving the short-course fractionation radiation therapy (i.e., 16 sessions or 20 sessions at 2.4 to 2.6 Gy fractions per session, with or without boost)
- Subject is currently on anti-EGFR (human epidermal growth factor receptor) therapy, such as Iressa (gefitinib) or Erbitux (cetuximab, C225)
- Previous radiation to the chest or breast
- Subjects with breast reconstruction prior to RT
- Previous diagnosis of radiosensitivity disorder (i.e., ataxia telangiectasia)
- Previous diagnosis of collagen vascular disorder or vasculitis
- Presence of unhealed surgical wounds in chest or breast region and/or breast infection
- Current daily application of a prescribed topical product to the skin within the RT area for an unrelated skin condition that cannot be discontinued during the participation in this clinical trial
- Presence of any active dermatological issues in radiation treatment area (i.e., fungal skin infection, dermatitis, psoriasis plaques, etc)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gary Morrowlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (6)
Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP
Newark, Delaware, 19713, United States
Heartland NCORP
Decatur, Illinois, 62526, United States
Metro-Minnesota NCORP
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55426, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Columbus NCORP
Columbus, Ohio, 43215, United States
Dayton Oncology Research Program
Dayton, Ohio, 45420, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Julie Ryan Wolf, PhD, MPH; Associate Professor of Dermatology and Radiation Oncology
- Organization
- University of Rochester
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary Morrow
University of Rochester NCORP Research Base
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2015
First Posted
September 22, 2015
Study Start
October 13, 2015
Primary Completion
September 30, 2016
Study Completion
September 30, 2016
Last Updated
November 6, 2017
Results First Posted
November 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share