Change in Free 25(OH)D After High Dose in Vitamin D Deficient Postmenopausal Women
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total 25(OH)D is currently used as a biomarker of vitamin D status. However, there is some debate as to whether total 25(OH)D is the best marker to use. It has been suggested that free vitamin D may be better because it may be more biologically available. There are also some uncertainties about how we treat vitamin D deficiency. A single dose is attractive because it is certain that the patient has had the dose and there is no requirement for ongoing compliance, but it is still not clear what the best dose is to give. Also, recent studies have highlighted that high dose vitamin D supplementation may increase the risk of falling in older populations. The investigators believe that studying how free vitamin D responds to different bolus doses is the best way address some of the current research gaps, including what is the best biomarker of vitamin D status, what is the mechanism of vitamin D toxicity and what is a safe bolus dose to treat deficiency. The investigators will study changes in total and free 25(OH)D, and also clinical response, to three different bolus doses of vitamin D (50 000IU, 150 000IU and 500 000IU) in 84 vitamin D deficient postmenopausal women, over a three month period with 5 study visits. A concurrent control group of 28 vitamin D sufficient postmenopausal women will also be recruited. This will allow the investigators to determine how total and free vitamin D change with bolus dosing and whether there is a disproportionate rise in free 25(OH)D with higher doses that may lead to hypercalcemia and falls.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 15, 2019
February 1, 2019
2.8 years
September 16, 2015
February 12, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Free 25(OH)D
Change in free 25(OH)D from baseline to visit 3 (5-7 days after administration)
Baseline to visit 3 (5-7 days after administration)
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Proportion of total 25(OH)D to free 25(OH)D
5(+/-2) days, 28(+/-3) days and 84(+/-5) days
1, 25(OH)2D
5(+/-2) days, 28(+/-3) days and 84(+/-5) days
Ionized calcium
5(+/-2) days, 28(+/-3) days and 84(+/-5) days
Parathyroid Hormone
5(+/-2) days, 28(+/-3) days and 84(+/-5) days
Bone turnover marker - Alkaline Phosphatase
5(+/-2) days, 28(+/-3) days and 84(+/-5) days
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
50 000IU Vitamin D3
EXPERIMENTAL50 000IU oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) administered at baseline only.
150 000IU Vitamin D3
EXPERIMENTAL150 000IU oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) administered at baseline only.
500 000IU Vitamin D3
EXPERIMENTAL500 000IU oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) administered at baseline only.
Concurrent Control
NO INTERVENTIONControl group to receive no intervention.
Interventions
Oral vitamin D3 doses made up using 50 000IU ampules of vitamin D3 dissolved in 1ml of olive oil.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Caucasian
- (OH)D \< 30nmol/l for treatment groups or 25(OH)D \>50nmol/l for control group
- BMI between 20 kg/m2 and 30kg/m2
- years and over and postmenopausal (at least 5 years since last menstrual period)
- Able and willing to participate in the study and provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- History of any long term immobilization (duration greater than three months)
- Pre-diagnosed diabetes mellitus
- High trauma fracture or low trauma fracture less than one year prior to recruitment
- History of or current conditions known to affect vitamin D or bone metabolism, including:
- Chronic renal disease Malabsorption syndromes Diagnosed endocrine disorders Hypercalcaemia Diagnosed restrictive eating disorder
- Use of medications or treatment known to affect vitamin D or bone metabolism such as bisphosphonates or anti-epileptic medication.
- Alcohol intake of greater than 21 units per week
- Holiday with significant sunlight exposure in the last six weeks
- Planned sun holiday within study period
- Abnormal clinical laboratory parameters that are assessed as clinically significant by the PI.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinical Research Facility
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S5 7AU, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Shibli-Rahhal A, Paturi B. Variations in parathyroid hormone concentration in patients with low 25 hydroxyvitamin D. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Jul;25(7):1931-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2687-4. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
PMID: 24647889BACKGROUNDSanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Simpson JA, Kotowicz MA, Young D, Nicholson GC. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 May 12;303(18):1815-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.594.
PMID: 20460620BACKGROUNDPowe CE, Ricciardi C, Berg AH, Erdenesanaa D, Collerone G, Ankers E, Wenger J, Karumanchi SA, Thadhani R, Bhan I. Vitamin D-binding protein modifies the vitamin D-bone mineral density relationship. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Jul;26(7):1609-16. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.387.
PMID: 21416506BACKGROUNDBhan I, Powe CE, Berg AH, Ankers E, Wenger JB, Karumanchi SA, Thadhani RI. Bioavailable vitamin D is more tightly linked to mineral metabolism than total vitamin D in incident hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2012 Jul;82(1):84-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.19. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
PMID: 22398410BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Walsh, MBChB, PhD
University of Sheffield
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2015
First Posted
September 17, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02