The Efficacy of Different Vitamin D Supplementation Delivery Methods
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To test the efficacy of different vitamin D delivery methods on serum 25(OH)D. Participants randomly assigned to one of seven groups - three placebo groups and 4 active supplement groups receiving 100,000IU vitamin D3
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 4, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2018
CompletedMarch 14, 2018
March 1, 2018
2 months
March 6, 2018
March 12, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
serum 25(OH)D
Changes in serum 25(OH)D levels
4 weeks
Study Arms (7)
Vitamin D3 pill
EXPERIMENTAL100 pills = 100,000IU + Dicalcium phosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, silicium dioxide, magnesium stearate
Pill placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR100 pills = Dicalcium phosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, silicium dioxide, magnesium stearate
Vitamin D3 oral liquid
EXPERIMENTAL100 drops = 100,000IU in orange syrup
Oral liquid placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR100 drops orange syrup
Skin oil + Vitamin D3 + penetrator
EXPERIMENTAL100,000IU + mineral oil+ Tangerine essential oil (10ml)
Skin oil + Vitamin D3
EXPERIMENTAL100,000IU + mineral oil
Skin oil placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSkin application: 100ml of mineral oil coloured with food colourant to match active oil sample
Interventions
100,000IU
Dicalcium phosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, silicium dioxide, magnesium stearate
Paraffinum Liquidum,Isopropyl Palmitate,Parfum
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy, female
You may not qualify if:
- any participant that was taking vitamin supplementation, had a skin condition that would prevent them from applying oil to their skin or were taking, or had been taking in the past 6-months, oestrogen based contraception
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Wolverhamptonlead
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trustcollaborator
- University of Worcestercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Wolverhampton
Walsall, West Midlands, WS1 3BD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, Kovacs CS, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;96(1):53-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2704. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
PMID: 21118827RESULTStoll D, Dudler J, Lamy O, Hans D, Krieg MA, Aubry-Rozier B. Can one or two high doses of oral vitamin D3 correct insufficiency in a non-supplemented rheumatologic population? Osteoporos Int. 2013 Feb;24(2):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1962-5. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
PMID: 22426953RESULTLeventis P, Kiely PD. The tolerability and biochemical effects of high-dose bolus vitamin D2 and D3 supplementation in patients with vitamin D insufficiency. Scand J Rheumatol. 2009 Mar-Apr;38(2):149-53. doi: 10.1080/03009740802419081.
PMID: 18991184RESULTWyon MA, Wolman R, Martin C, Galloway S. The efficacy of different vitamin D supplementation delivery methods on serum 25(OH)D: A randomised double-blind placebo trial. Clin Nutr. 2021 Feb;40(2):388-393. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
PMID: 32703720DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Matthew Wyon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2018
First Posted
March 13, 2018
Study Start
February 2, 2017
Primary Completion
April 4, 2017
Study Completion
April 4, 2017
Last Updated
March 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share