An Evaluation of a New Nonverbal Treatment for Global Aphasia
An Investigation Into the Effect of a Novel, Non Verbal, Cognitive Treatment on Functional Communication in Global Aphasia
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
People with global aphasia (PwGA) post stroke have little to no meaningful communication abilities (ie limited comprehension, spoken language, reading and writing abilities).A proportion of PwGA will also have limited abilities to use any alternative means of communication e.g. gesture, pictures or computer devices. There is a suggestion in the literature that this is because of co-occurring cognitive deficits. The consequence is that these clients are unable to reliably communicate even their basic needs.This is commonly known as having no functional communication abilities. Such PwGA tend not to respond to standard speech and language therapy interventions. This research will investigate the effect of a new cognitive intervention designed to improve basic functional communication abilities. The treatment will be nonverbal and involve computer and paperbased tasks ordered hierarchically from basic to more complex tasks. Six to eight participants will take part. All their sessions will take place in their own home. For some this may be a care home. They will first complete a diagnostic communication assessment in order for baseline abilities to be established. Further formal language and cognitive assessments will be conducted over a period of 6 weeks. A relative/friend will complete a questionnaires about mood/communication. The PwGA will also be videoed interacting with the research student e.g. looking at a magazine, completing a jigsaw, answering questions and making choices non-verbally. The participants then receive the new intervention 3 times a week for 6 consecutive weeks. All intervention sessions will be videoed. Then participants will be reassessed over 2 weeks using the same assessments as prior to the intervention. The questionnaire with their relative/friend and videoed activity session will also be repeated. After a twelve week break the participant will be videoed interacting with the research student complete some of the assessments again and their relative will re-complete the questionnaires.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Dec 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 29, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.5 years
June 22, 2015
January 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
American Speech and Hearing Association -Functional Assessment of Communication
Questionnaire completed by friend/relative
27 weeks
Constructed Interaction Task
video recorded interaction
27 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Aphasia Screening Test
14 weeks
Mood Screen
27 weeks
Pyramids and Palm Trees Test
27 weeks
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
14 weeks
Butt Non verbal reasoning test
27 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
BASELINE TESTING
NO INTERVENTIONLanguage and cognitive assessments conducted
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALIntervention given: visual tracking pressing a button every time a picture is seen on the screen * playing dominoes and snap * pressing a button every time a specific picture is seen on the screen * Pressing a button every time a specific sound is heard * Matching objects to a picture * Matching gestures to objects * Matching two connected objects * Sorting objects by categories * Matching sounds to objects * "Complete the category" and "odd on out with objects" * Choosing target objects by pointing * Choosing objects to complete the category by pointing
Post intervention
NO INTERVENTIONRepeated testing
Interventions
The tasks are: * visually tracking a picture as it moves across the computer screen * pressing a button every time a picture is seen on the screen * pressing a button every time a specific picture is seen on the screen * Pressing a button every time a specific sound is heard * Matching objects to a picture * Matching gestures to objects * Matching two connected objects * Sorting objects by categories * Matching sounds to objects * "Complete the category" and "odd on out with objects" * Choosing target objects by pointing * Choosing objects to complete the category by pointing
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- have global aphasia as diagnosed by an SLT
- have little or no verbal output
- inconsistent single word comprehension
- little or no ability to read or write
- little or no ability to use alternative modes of communication
- Little or no ability to make choices in function
- no diagnosis/history of a progressive neurological condition
- no diagnosis of hearing loss
- no diagnosis/history of a mental health condition
- English as a first language
You may not qualify if:
- has another form of aphasia
- is able to consistently express basic needs non-verbally or verbally.
- is able to participate in communicative interaction with a familiar other
- has a history of a progressive neurological condition
- has hearing loss
- has a diagnosis/history of a mental health condition
- does not have English as a first language.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University College London, Research Dept of Language and Cognition
London, WC1N, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suzanne Beeke, PhD
UCL
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2015
First Posted
September 10, 2015
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share