Enhanced Early Supported Discharge for Stroke in Camden
EESD
Evaluation of the Implementation of an Enhanced ESD Service for Stroke Survivors With Moderate to Severe Impairments and the Resulting Clinical and Cost Outcomes When Compared to Similar Patients in an Unchanged Stroke Care Pathway in a Neighbouring Borough.
1 other identifier
interventional
1
1 country
1
Brief Summary
An Early Supported Discharge (ESD) service for stroke is an evidence based intervention that aims to enable a particular group of patients who have a mild to moderate stroke to be discharged from hospital early and receive the same intensity of rehabilitation in their home. Analysis of almost 1600 patients has demonstrated that ESD can reduce long term dependency, decrease admission to institutionalized care as well as shorten hospital stay. This model has also been shown to reduce death and institutionalized care at five years (Fjaetoft et al, 2011) and has been shown to be cost effective (Saka, 2005.) A study by National Heath Service (NHS) London showed that patient outcomes has not been affected by being treated at home and that there have not been an increase in readmissions due to the setting up of an ESD service. However, those with moderate to severe strokes are often not eligible for ESD rehabilitation. This study aims to offer twenty Camden residents an Enhanced Early Supported Discharge service in which stroke survivors with moderate to severe impairments are eligible. Participants will be recruited from the University College London Hospital (UCLH)l Hyper Acute Stroke Unit and acute stroke units at UCLH and the Royal Free Hospital. This study will compare health and economic outcomes of early Multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation in the community compared to traditional inpatient and community Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for people with moderate to severe post stroke impairments. We will also collect the views of the participants and their carers regarding being treated at home. The objectives are to discover:
- 1.What impact does the implementation of an Enhanced ESD service for stroke survivors with moderate to severe impairments have on clinical and cost outcomes compared to an unchanged care pathway in a neighbouring borough?
- 2.What are the staff, participant and carer views and experiences of an Enhanced ESD service?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedNovember 11, 2014
November 1, 2014
5 months
January 29, 2014
November 10, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Modified Barthel Index
This measure will identify improvements in functional ability.
This will be collected prior to the start of the intervention (approx 7 days post stroke) and after 8 weeks of therapy (approx 9 weeks post stroke)
PHQ2
This measure will monitor psychological status pre and post intervention.
At the start of the intervention (approx 7 days post stroke) and at the end of the 8 week intervention (approx 9 weeks post stroke)
The Goal Attainment Scale Lite
The Goal Attainment Scale Lite will be used to measure changes in patient reported outcome measures.
At the start of the intervention (approx 7 days post stroke) and at the end of the 8 week intervention (approx 9 weeks post stroke)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
EQ5D to be used to measure the cost effectiveness of the intervention when compared to standard hospital care.
Five days post stroke, 9 weeks post stroke and at 6 months.
Other Outcomes (2)
Staff, patient and carer experience surveys
After 8 weeks of the intervention (approx 9 weeks post stroke)
Carer EQ5D and Caregiver Strain Index
Within approx 7 days of the patient's stroke and 8 weeks later (approx 9 weeks post stroke)
Study Arms (2)
Stroke rehabilitation
EXPERIMENTALControl Group
NO INTERVENTIONThis group will undergo rehabilitation as per the current stroke rehabilitation pathway.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Only those with capacity to consent will be admitted into the study.
- Patient must be registered with a Camden GP to be offered Enhanced ESD. Must be registered with a Camden or Islington GP for the collection and analysis of routine data.
- Patient must be over eighteen years old
- Patient has a confirmed diagnosis of stroke from a Stroke Consultant
- Patient consent provided (assistance given from speech and language therapists where stroke survivor has significant language and communication impairment);
- Patient is medically stable and fit to be managed at home as assessed by Acute Stroke Consultant as part of the MDT. This includes the utilisation of measures such as NHISS score and GCS to determine the medical status of a patient.
- The criteria to make this decision is defined in the Community Care (Delayed Discharges) Act, 2003 as: A clinical decision has been made that the patient is ready for transfer AND a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) decision has been made that the patient is ready for transfer AND the patient is safe to discharge/transfer.
- Patient is intending to return home or to supported accommodation following hospital stay (in line with current ESD guidance;)
- Patient is safe to transfer home with provision of equipment (e.g. Hospital bed, chair, telecare devices etc.) and a care package if required. This means at least the following is conducted prior to discharge where it is appropriate - home visit risk assessment, manual handling risk assessment, cognitive assessment (e.g. mental capacity assessment form (to be provided with referral) and own safety awareness);
- Patient has active nursing / therapy goals and has potential to participate and respond to a rehabilitation / disability management programme;
- Toileting needs can be managed within available care, support and/or equipment (commode, pads and bottle) either at the point of discharge home or within ≤ 2 weeks of returning home;
- Patient is able to transfer with assistance of 2 people and/or equipment;
- Patient's dysphagia, nutrition and hydration can be safely managed in the community, as assessed by stroke consultant and/or medical team responsible for individual's hospital care, ward nursing staff, Enhanced ESD nurses, the referring and receiving SLTs and dietitians. Risk of malnutrition assessed by MDT using standardised nutritional screening tool (eg MUST).
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has failed a Mental Capacity Act Assessment (2005) and is deemed not to have capacity to consent to participation in the study.
- Patient is not able to engage with or respond to a rehabilitation programme, for example, where a significant cognitive impairment / behavioural problem limits their ability to effectively engage in rehabilitation;
- Patient is not safe to be transferred home despite provision of equipment and a care package
- Patient requires help of more than 2 person to transfer, and/or does not have sufficient space within their home to safely accommodate equipment (such as a hoist) required for a safe discharge
- Clients requiring constant supervision over 24 hours which is anticipated not to resolve within seven days. The need for supervision may be secondary to impaired concentration/attention/safety awareness/impulsivity/visual impairment/reduced insight/severe aphasia/need for prompts and hands on assistance to maintain safety when standing, transferring and washing etc.
- Clients whose prognosis for functional improvement is poor and who do not have functional goals that can be achieved within 8 weeks.
- Not able to manage medications with carers dispensing from blister pack and prompting client to take medications.
- Patients whose normal place of residence is a Nursing or Residential home. This cohort of patients are likely to have ongoing long term issues whose needs are best met via the community pathway for long term rehabilitation needs.
- Patients who have a NasoGastric tube in situ and therefore do not have established nutrition. Those who have long term PEGs will not be excluded as their nutritional needs can be met non-orally.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CNWL NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charlie Davie, MBBS
Chief Investigator
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2014
First Posted
February 4, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-11