NCT02053987

Brief Summary

An Early Supported Discharge (ESD) service for stroke is an evidence based intervention that aims to enable a particular group of patients who have a mild to moderate stroke to be discharged from hospital early and receive the same intensity of rehabilitation in their home. Analysis of almost 1600 patients has demonstrated that ESD can reduce long term dependency, decrease admission to institutionalized care as well as shorten hospital stay. This model has also been shown to reduce death and institutionalized care at five years (Fjaetoft et al, 2011) and has been shown to be cost effective (Saka, 2005.) A study by National Heath Service (NHS) London showed that patient outcomes has not been affected by being treated at home and that there have not been an increase in readmissions due to the setting up of an ESD service. However, those with moderate to severe strokes are often not eligible for ESD rehabilitation. This study aims to offer twenty Camden residents an Enhanced Early Supported Discharge service in which stroke survivors with moderate to severe impairments are eligible. Participants will be recruited from the University College London Hospital (UCLH)l Hyper Acute Stroke Unit and acute stroke units at UCLH and the Royal Free Hospital. This study will compare health and economic outcomes of early Multidisciplinary stroke rehabilitation in the community compared to traditional inpatient and community Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for people with moderate to severe post stroke impairments. We will also collect the views of the participants and their carers regarding being treated at home. The objectives are to discover:

  1. 1.What impact does the implementation of an Enhanced ESD service for stroke survivors with moderate to severe impairments have on clinical and cost outcomes compared to an unchanged care pathway in a neighbouring borough?
  2. 2.What are the staff, participant and carer views and experiences of an Enhanced ESD service?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 29, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 4, 2014

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2014

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

November 11, 2014

Status Verified

November 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

January 29, 2014

Last Update Submit

November 10, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Modified Barthel Index

    This measure will identify improvements in functional ability.

    This will be collected prior to the start of the intervention (approx 7 days post stroke) and after 8 weeks of therapy (approx 9 weeks post stroke)

  • PHQ2

    This measure will monitor psychological status pre and post intervention.

    At the start of the intervention (approx 7 days post stroke) and at the end of the 8 week intervention (approx 9 weeks post stroke)

  • The Goal Attainment Scale Lite

    The Goal Attainment Scale Lite will be used to measure changes in patient reported outcome measures.

    At the start of the intervention (approx 7 days post stroke) and at the end of the 8 week intervention (approx 9 weeks post stroke)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • EQ5D to be used to measure the cost effectiveness of the intervention when compared to standard hospital care.

    Five days post stroke, 9 weeks post stroke and at 6 months.

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Staff, patient and carer experience surveys

    After 8 weeks of the intervention (approx 9 weeks post stroke)

  • Carer EQ5D and Caregiver Strain Index

    Within approx 7 days of the patient's stroke and 8 weeks later (approx 9 weeks post stroke)

Study Arms (2)

Stroke rehabilitation

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Intensive rehabilitation in the home.

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

This group will undergo rehabilitation as per the current stroke rehabilitation pathway.

Interventions

Stroke rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Only those with capacity to consent will be admitted into the study.
  • Patient must be registered with a Camden GP to be offered Enhanced ESD. Must be registered with a Camden or Islington GP for the collection and analysis of routine data.
  • Patient must be over eighteen years old
  • Patient has a confirmed diagnosis of stroke from a Stroke Consultant
  • Patient consent provided (assistance given from speech and language therapists where stroke survivor has significant language and communication impairment);
  • Patient is medically stable and fit to be managed at home as assessed by Acute Stroke Consultant as part of the MDT. This includes the utilisation of measures such as NHISS score and GCS to determine the medical status of a patient.
  • The criteria to make this decision is defined in the Community Care (Delayed Discharges) Act, 2003 as: A clinical decision has been made that the patient is ready for transfer AND a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) decision has been made that the patient is ready for transfer AND the patient is safe to discharge/transfer.
  • Patient is intending to return home or to supported accommodation following hospital stay (in line with current ESD guidance;)
  • Patient is safe to transfer home with provision of equipment (e.g. Hospital bed, chair, telecare devices etc.) and a care package if required. This means at least the following is conducted prior to discharge where it is appropriate - home visit risk assessment, manual handling risk assessment, cognitive assessment (e.g. mental capacity assessment form (to be provided with referral) and own safety awareness);
  • Patient has active nursing / therapy goals and has potential to participate and respond to a rehabilitation / disability management programme;
  • Toileting needs can be managed within available care, support and/or equipment (commode, pads and bottle) either at the point of discharge home or within ≤ 2 weeks of returning home;
  • Patient is able to transfer with assistance of 2 people and/or equipment;
  • Patient's dysphagia, nutrition and hydration can be safely managed in the community, as assessed by stroke consultant and/or medical team responsible for individual's hospital care, ward nursing staff, Enhanced ESD nurses, the referring and receiving SLTs and dietitians. Risk of malnutrition assessed by MDT using standardised nutritional screening tool (eg MUST).

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient has failed a Mental Capacity Act Assessment (2005) and is deemed not to have capacity to consent to participation in the study.
  • Patient is not able to engage with or respond to a rehabilitation programme, for example, where a significant cognitive impairment / behavioural problem limits their ability to effectively engage in rehabilitation;
  • Patient is not safe to be transferred home despite provision of equipment and a care package
  • Patient requires help of more than 2 person to transfer, and/or does not have sufficient space within their home to safely accommodate equipment (such as a hoist) required for a safe discharge
  • Clients requiring constant supervision over 24 hours which is anticipated not to resolve within seven days. The need for supervision may be secondary to impaired concentration/attention/safety awareness/impulsivity/visual impairment/reduced insight/severe aphasia/need for prompts and hands on assistance to maintain safety when standing, transferring and washing etc.
  • Clients whose prognosis for functional improvement is poor and who do not have functional goals that can be achieved within 8 weeks.
  • Not able to manage medications with carers dispensing from blister pack and prompting client to take medications.
  • Patients whose normal place of residence is a Nursing or Residential home. This cohort of patients are likely to have ongoing long term issues whose needs are best met via the community pathway for long term rehabilitation needs.
  • Patients who have a NasoGastric tube in situ and therefore do not have established nutrition. Those who have long term PEGs will not be excluded as their nutritional needs can be met non-orally.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CNWL NHS Foundation Trust

London, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Charlie Davie, MBBS

    Chief Investigator

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2014

First Posted

February 4, 2014

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion

August 1, 2014

Study Completion

November 1, 2014

Last Updated

November 11, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-11

Locations