Manual Versus Oscillating-rotating Toothbrushes After Root Coverage Procedure
Gingival Margin Stability After Mucogingival Plastic Surgery. The Effect of Manual Versus Powered Toothbrushing: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the gingival margin stability with the use of oscillating-rotating toothbrushes compared to manual toothbrushes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2015
CompletedAugust 27, 2015
August 1, 2015
9 months
August 21, 2015
August 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Complete Root Coverage Rate
Abscence of exposed root surface measured ad percentage
Change in Complete Root Coverage Rate at 1 month
Change in Complete Root Coverage Rate
Abscence of exposed root surface measured ad percentage
Change in Complete Root Coverage Rate at 3 months
Change in Complete Root Coverage Rate
Abscence of exposed root surface measured ad percentage
Change in Complete Root Coverage Rate at 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Recession Depth
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Clinical Attachment Level
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Probing Pocket Depth
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Manual Toothbrush
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients were instructed in the Roll Brushing Technique, twice daily for 2 min.
Oscillating-rotating toothbrush
EXPERIMENTALPatients received manufacturer's instructions for use, including brushing twice daily for 2 min.
Interventions
Gum Delicate Post-Surgical Toothbrush, Oral-B, Procter \& Gamble, Cincinnati, OH
Triumph 5000, Oral-B, Procter \& Gamble, Cincinnati, OH
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Full-Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) ≤25%
- Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS) ≤25%
- Miller Class I and II buccal recession ≥2 mm
You may not qualify if:
- Relevant systemic condition or disease
- Smokers
- Teeth with prosthetic crowns or restorations in the cervical area
- Presence of pulling frenum in the keratinized tissue
- Previous mucogingival or periodontal surgery in the experimental site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinica Odontoiatrica IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, MI, 20122, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Giulio Rasperini
Unit of Periodontology, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Policlinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2015
First Posted
August 27, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08