WEAR (Wearability and Evaluation of Adjustable Refraction) III
WEARIII
1 other identifier
interventional
324
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Two-month randomized trial comparing three groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 15, 2018
October 1, 2018
9 months
August 16, 2015
October 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wearing spectacles proportion
The participators in each group may have the different wearing spectacles proportion.
5 months after the start of the project
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The quality of life after wearing glasses(questionnaires)
5 months after the start of the project
Other Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of the user's subjective impression(questionnaires)
5 months after the start of the project
Damaged condition of the glasses
5 months after the start of the project
Study Arms (3)
Group 1
OTHERSelf-refraction with adjustable glasses
Group 2
OTHERSubjective refraction by an expert refractionist after auto refraction and receiving custom standard glasses
Group 3
OTHERSubjective refraction by an expert refractionist after auto refraction and receiving ready-made glasses
Interventions
The glasses will be used for refraction and wearing within professional instructions.
The custom standard glasses are made by the traditional standards after refraction.
The glasses have been made already before the refraction in the hospital. And they will be chosen by prescription after refraction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old middle school students from two locations in Guangdong Province.
- With ≤ -1.00 Diopter of myopic refractive error in each eye.
- With uncorrected vision ≤ 6/12 in both eyes thought to be due to refractive error (that is, correctable to at least 6/7.5 with subjective refraction by an optometrist).
- With informed consents(There are two types of informed consents. One of them is whether the parents of the students agree their kids to participate in the project. The other informed consent is whether the parents agree their kids to have the cycloplegic refraction. If the students were admitted to participate in project but without being agreed to have cycloplegic refraction by their parents , they would have non cycloplegic retinoscopy.).
You may not qualify if:
- Those corrected VA can not up to 6/7.5 with subjective refraction by an optometrist.
- Those with significant strabismus or vision abnormality (keratopathy, cataract, vitreous macular diseases ), or with vision deficiency ( amblyopia ) children are to be excluded.
- Children developing acquired vision problems other than myopia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, Xu J, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern china. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Mar;45(3):793-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1051.
PMID: 14985292BACKGROUNDHe M, Zheng Y, Xiang F. Prevalence of myopia in urban and rural children in mainland China. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jan;86(1):40-4. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181940719.
PMID: 19104465BACKGROUNDLi L, Lam J, Lu Y, Ye Y, Lam DS, Gao Y, Sharma A, Zhang M, Griffiths S, Congdon N. Attitudes of students, parents, and teachers toward glasses use in rural China. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;128(6):759-65. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.73.
PMID: 20547954BACKGROUNDHe M, Congdon N, MacKenzie G, Zeng Y, Silver JD, Ellwein L. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou. Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.003. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
PMID: 21232802BACKGROUNDZhou Z, Zeng J, Ma X, Pang X, Yi H, Chen Q, Meltzer ME, He M, Rozelle S, Congdon N. Accuracy of rural refractionists in western China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jan 7;55(1):154-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13250.
PMID: 24327616BACKGROUNDWang CY, Zhang G, Tang B, Jin L, Huang W, Wang X, Chen T, Zhu W, Xiao B, Wang J, Zhou Z, Tang Z, Liang Y, Crescioni M, Wilson D, McAneney H, Silver JD, Moore B, Congdon N. A Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Wearing Adjustable Glasses versus Standard and Ready-made Spectacles among Chinese Schoolchildren: Wearability and Evaluation of Adjustable Refraction III. Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
PMID: 31543351DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH
The Key Laboratory, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, MD,MPH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2015
First Posted
August 20, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 15, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10