NCT02529540

Brief Summary

Two-month randomized trial comparing three groups.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
324

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 16, 2015

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 20, 2015

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 15, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

August 16, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Myopiaself-refractionglassesspectacles

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Wearing spectacles proportion

    The participators in each group may have the different wearing spectacles proportion.

    5 months after the start of the project

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The quality of life after wearing glasses(questionnaires)

    5 months after the start of the project

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Evaluation of the user's subjective impression(questionnaires)

    5 months after the start of the project

  • Damaged condition of the glasses

    5 months after the start of the project

Study Arms (3)

Group 1

OTHER

Self-refraction with adjustable glasses

Other: Adjustable glasses

Group 2

OTHER

Subjective refraction by an expert refractionist after auto refraction and receiving custom standard glasses

Other: Custom standard glasses

Group 3

OTHER

Subjective refraction by an expert refractionist after auto refraction and receiving ready-made glasses

Other: Ready-made glasses

Interventions

The glasses will be used for refraction and wearing within professional instructions.

Group 1

The custom standard glasses are made by the traditional standards after refraction.

Group 2

The glasses have been made already before the refraction in the hospital. And they will be chosen by prescription after refraction.

Group 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age11 Years - 16 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • years old middle school students from two locations in Guangdong Province.
  • With ≤ -1.00 Diopter of myopic refractive error in each eye.
  • With uncorrected vision ≤ 6/12 in both eyes thought to be due to refractive error (that is, correctable to at least 6/7.5 with subjective refraction by an optometrist).
  • With informed consents(There are two types of informed consents. One of them is whether the parents of the students agree their kids to participate in the project. The other informed consent is whether the parents agree their kids to have the cycloplegic refraction. If the students were admitted to participate in project but without being agreed to have cycloplegic refraction by their parents , they would have non cycloplegic retinoscopy.).

You may not qualify if:

  • Those corrected VA can not up to 6/7.5 with subjective refraction by an optometrist.
  • Those with significant strabismus or vision abnormality (keratopathy, cataract, vitreous macular diseases ), or with vision deficiency ( amblyopia ) children are to be excluded.
  • Children developing acquired vision problems other than myopia.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • He M, Zeng J, Liu Y, Xu J, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern china. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Mar;45(3):793-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1051.

    PMID: 14985292BACKGROUND
  • He M, Zheng Y, Xiang F. Prevalence of myopia in urban and rural children in mainland China. Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Jan;86(1):40-4. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181940719.

    PMID: 19104465BACKGROUND
  • Li L, Lam J, Lu Y, Ye Y, Lam DS, Gao Y, Sharma A, Zhang M, Griffiths S, Congdon N. Attitudes of students, parents, and teachers toward glasses use in rural China. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;128(6):759-65. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.73.

    PMID: 20547954BACKGROUND
  • He M, Congdon N, MacKenzie G, Zeng Y, Silver JD, Ellwein L. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou. Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.003. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

    PMID: 21232802BACKGROUND
  • Zhou Z, Zeng J, Ma X, Pang X, Yi H, Chen Q, Meltzer ME, He M, Rozelle S, Congdon N. Accuracy of rural refractionists in western China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jan 7;55(1):154-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13250.

    PMID: 24327616BACKGROUND
  • Wang CY, Zhang G, Tang B, Jin L, Huang W, Wang X, Chen T, Zhu W, Xiao B, Wang J, Zhou Z, Tang Z, Liang Y, Crescioni M, Wilson D, McAneney H, Silver JD, Moore B, Congdon N. A Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Wearing Adjustable Glasses versus Standard and Ready-made Spectacles among Chinese Schoolchildren: Wearability and Evaluation of Adjustable Refraction III. Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH

    The Key Laboratory, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a randomized non-inferiority trial, and the margin of the non-inferiority is 20%.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, MD,MPH

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2015

First Posted

August 20, 2015

Study Start

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2016

Study Completion

June 1, 2016

Last Updated

October 15, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10